Cover not available
Part of
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 49–72

Decreasing dependence on orthography in phonological development

Evidence from vowel harmony in English-Turkish interlanguage

| Indiana University
| Indiana University

Despite the general transparency of standard Turkish orthography, it fails to distinguish the (not fully predictable) contrast between coronal vs. dorsal laterals following back vowels in certain loanwords: the laterals in /koɫ/ <kol> and /rol/ <rol> are both represented as <l>. This contrast results in non-canonical vowel harmony, where the backness of a suffix vowel is determined by the lateral, rather than by the preceding vowel (e.g. /koɫ-a/ <kola>, but /rol-e/ <role>). While early English-Turkish learners performed at a significantly higher level of accuracy on selecting the target suffix vowel in these contexts with auditory-­only presentation of the stimulus than with auditory and written presentation, intermediate and advanced learners come to rely more on auditory stimuli and less on orthography.

Keywords: L2 acquisition, orthography, phonology, Turkish, vowel harmony
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.03ozc
References
Bassetti, B
2009 Orthographic input and second language phonology. In Input Matters in SLA, T. Piske, P. Thorsten & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 191–206. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R
1990 The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis 20: 3–48.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N
1985 The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2: 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, G.N. & Hume, E.V
1995 In The Internal Organization of Speech Sounds, J.A. Goldsmith (ed), 245–306. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clements, G.N. & Sezer, E
1982 Vowel and consonant disharmony in Turkish. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, H. van der Hults & N. Smith (eds), 213–255. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Demircan, Ö
1996 Türkçenin Sesdizimi. Istanbul: Der Yayınevi.Google Scholar
Erdener, V.D. & Burnham, D.K
2005 The role of audiovisual speech and orthographic information in nonnative speech production. Language Learning 55: 191–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. & Wanrooij, K
2010 The effect of L1 orthography on non-native vowel perception. Language and Speech 53: 343–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felix, S
1985 More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research 1: 47–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V., Hayes, B., Curtiss, S., Szabolcsi, A., Stowell, T., Stabler, E., Sportiche, D., Koopman, H., Keating, P., Munro, P., Hyams, N. & Steriade, D
2000 Linguistics: An Introduction to Linguistic Theory. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hayes, B
1995 Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Nicol, J. & Barker, J
2010 Learning the phonological forms of new words: Effects of orthographic and auditory input. Language and Speech 53: 367–381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L.M
2014 How autosegmental is phonology? The Linguistic Review 31: 363–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kabak, B
2011 Turkish vowel harmony. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2831–2854. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J
1997 Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D
1981 Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Levi, S.V
2001 Glides, laterals and Turkish vowel harmony. Papers from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 37: 379–393.
Montrul, S
1997 Transitivity Alternations in Second Language Acquisition: A Crosslinguistic Study of English, Spanish and Turkish. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Nevins, A
2010 Locality in Vowel Harmony [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 55]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oxley, J., Buckingham, H., Roussel, N. & Daniloff, R
2006 Metrical/syllabic factors in English allophony: Dark /l/. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 20: 109–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özçelik, Ö
2011 Representation and Acquisition of Stress: The Case of Turkish. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A
1996 L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sproat, R. & Fujimura, O
1993 Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics 21: 291–311.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. & Dimitrakopoulou, M
2007 The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 23: 215–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Underhill, R
1976 Turkish Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. & Liberman, M
2009 Investigating /l/ variation in English through forced alignment. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2009: 2215–2218.
2011 ‘/l/ variation in American English: A corpus approach’. Journal of Speech Sciences 1: 35–46.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Barrios, Shannon L, Joselyn M Rodriguez & Taylor Anne Barriuso
2023. The acquisition of L2 allophonic variants: The role of phonological distribution and lexical cues. Second Language Research 39:3 ► pp. 899 ff. DOI logo
Erdener, Doğu
2020. Second Language Instruction. In Handbook of Research on Bilingual and Intercultural Education [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ], ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Hayes-Harb, Rachel & Shannon Barrios
2021. The influence of orthography in second language phonological acquisition. Language Teaching 54:3 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Showalter, Catherine E.
2020. RUSSIAN PHONO-LEXICAL ACQUISITION AND ORTHOGRAPHIC INPUT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.