Article published in:
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 165191
References

References

Anderson, B.
2008Forms of evidence and grammatical development in the acquisition of adjective position in L2 French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aygen, G.
2007Q-particle. Dil ve Edebiyat Dergisi 4: 1–30.Google Scholar
Belletti, A. & Leonini, C.
2004Subject Inversion in L2 Italian. In EUROSLA Yearbook 4, S. Foster-Cohen, M. Sharwood Smith, A. Sorace & M. Ota (eds), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. & Sorace, A.
2007Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, G.
1999Syntax-semantics interface. In MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science, 
Wilson, R.A. & F.C. Keil, 744–745. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coppieters, R.
1987Competence differences between native and near-native speakers. Language 63: 544–573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Hathorn, J.
2005Quelque chose...de remarquable in English-French acquisition: Mandatory, informationally encapsulated computations in second language interpretation. Second Language Research 21: 291–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dekydtspotter, L. & Sprouse, R.
2001Mental design and (second) language epistemology: Adjectival restrictions of wh-quantifiers and tense in English-French interlanguage. Second Language Research 17: 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, S.
1983A Study of the Effects of Principal Branching Direction in Second Language Acquisition: The Generalization of a Parameter of Universal Grammar from First to Second Language Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
1987A Parameter-Setting Model of L2 Acquisition: Experimental Studies in Anaphora. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franceschina, F.
2001Morphological or syntactic deficits in near-native speakers? An assessment of some current proposals. Second Language Research 17(3): 213–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagstrom, P.
1998Decomposing Questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.
2000The movement of question particles. In NELS 30: Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society, M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall & J.-Y. Kim (eds), 275–286. 
Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Chan, C.
1997The partial availability of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis.’ Second Language Research 13: 187–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B.D.
1997Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Proceedings of the 21st Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD), E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Ionin, T. & Wexler, K.
2002Why is “is” easier than “-s”?: Acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child L2-English learners. Second Language Research 18: 95–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G.
1984Is there a structural foreign accent? A comparison of syntactic and phonological errors in second language acquisition. Language Learning 34: 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P. & Rothman, J.
2008Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. In EUROSLA Yearbook 8, L. Roberts, F. Myles & A. David (eds), 135–163. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamalı, B.
2011The Question Particle in Turkish: Consequences for the Interfaces. In Online complement to Proceedings of WCCFL 28, M. Byram Washburn, S. Ouwayda, Ch. Ouyang, B. Yin, C. Ipek, L. Marston & A. Walker (eds). https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/wccfl28pro/ (22 January, 2014).Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J.
1997Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
1998Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research 14: 359–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lewis, G.
1967Turkish Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Liceras, J.
1988Syntax and stylistics: More on the pro-drop parameter. In Learnability and Second Languages: A Book of Readings, J. Pankhurst, M. Sharwood Smith & P. Van Buren (eds), 71–93. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Lozano, C.
2009. Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface. In Representational Deficits in SLA: Studies in Honor of Roger Hawkins [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-K.I. Leung & M. Sharwood Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T.
& 1997OPC effects in the L2 acquisition of Spanish. In Contemporary Perspectives on the Acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 1: Developing Grammars, A.T. Pérez-Leroux & W. Glass (eds), 149–165. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T. & Glass, W.
1999Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: Probabilistic versus generative approaches. Second Language Research 15: 220–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L.
2000Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
2009Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences? L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
2010Scalar implicatures in second language acquisition.Lingua 120: 2444–2462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
2005Selective optionality in language development. In Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 265], L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (eds), 55–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Gradedness and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In Gradience in Grammar, G. Fanselow, C. Féry, R. Vogel & M. Schlesewsky (eds), 106–123. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(1): 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Filiaci, F.
2006Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. & Serratrice, L.
2009Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13(2): 195–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.-M. & Sorace, A.
2006Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 30) , D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia & C. Zaller (eds), 653–64. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Valenzuela,E.
2005L2 Ultimate Attainment and the Syntax-Discourse Interface: The Acquisition of Topic Constructions in Non-Native Spanish and English. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Valenzuela, E.
2006L2 endstate grammars and incomplete acquisition of the Spanish CLLD constructions. In Inquiries in Linguistic Development: In Honor of Lydia White, R. Slabakova, S. Montrul & P. Prévost (eds), 283–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
2011Second language acquisition at the interfaces. Lingua 121: 577–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar