Article published in:
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 313–332

Structural priming in L2 Turkish

A study on possessive noun phrases and noun clauses

| University of Oslo, Center for Multilingualism in Society Across the Lifespan (MultiLing)
Structural priming is the facilitation in the processing of a linguistic form due to repetition (Bock 1986). This study investigates structural priming in second language (L2) acquisition of Turkish in relation to the representation of L2 grammar. The linguistic structures investigated are possessive noun phrases (NPs) and noun clauses with nominalized verbs, which share the same external genitive-possessive morpho-syntax in Turkish. Adult L2 learners first read prime sentences, and then completed target fragments. Overall, they produced more possessive NPs than noun clauses. Crucially, they produced more possessive NPs after reading NP primes, and more noun clauses following noun clause primes. This suggests that L2 learners have two distinct mental representations for these structures, rather than a single, unspecified one.
Keywords: L2 Turkish, noun clauses, possessive noun phrases, structural priming
Published online: 25 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.12mer
References

References

Altmann, G.T.M. & Kamide, Y.
1999 Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73: 247–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arai, M., Van Gompel, R .P.G. & Scheepers, C.
2007 Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 54: 218–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bahadır, G.
2012 Structural Priming in Turkish Genitive-Possessive Constructions. PhD dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Bernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R.J. & Pickering, M.J.
2007 Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33: 931–949. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, J.K.
1986 Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H.P.
2007 Syntactic priming. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(1–2): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J. & Cleland, A.A.
2000 Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75: B13–B25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J. & McLean, J.F.
2005 Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31: 468–481. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Stewart, A.J. & McLean, J.F.
2000 Syntactic priming in spoken production: Linguistic and temporal interference. Memory and Cognition 28: 1397–1302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, H.P., Pickering, M.J., Liversedge, S.P., Stewart, A.J. & Urbach, T.P.
1995 Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 489–506. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Z.G., Pickering, M.J. & Branigan, H.P.
2012 Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language 66: 833–849. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, A.A. & Pickering, M.J.
2003 The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49: 214–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment
(CEFR) Language Policy Unit, Strasbourg. http://​www​.coe​.int​/t​/dg4​/linguistic​/Source​/Framework​_EN​.pdf (22 March 2014)
Ferreira, V.S.
2003 The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 379–398. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, A.P.
2013 Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics, 4th edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Flett, S.
2003 Syntactic priming in L1 and L2 Spanish. Paper presented at the 2003 Linguistics Postgraduate Conference . http://​www​.lel​.ed​.ac​.uk​/~pgc​/archive​/2003​/proc03​/Susanna​_Flett03​.pdf
Gentner, D.
1981 Some interesting differences between nouns and verbs. Cognition and Brain Theory 4: 161–78.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005 Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar.London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Turkish: An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gries, S.T.
2005 Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34: 365–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.J. & Kolk, H.H.J.
1998 Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech 41: 143–184.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.J. & Westenberg, C.
2000 Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition 75: B27–B39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, R.J., Bernolet, S., Schoonbaert, S., Speybroeck, S. & Vanderelst, D.
2008 Syntactic priming persists while the lexical boost decays: Evidence from written and spoken dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 58: 214–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keskin, C.
2009 Subject Agreement-dependency of Accusative Case in Turkish, or Jump-starting Grammatical Machinery. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. & McDonough, K.
2008 Learners’ production of passives during syntactic priming activities. Applied Linguistics 29: 149–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, J.
1997 Turkish Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
2001 Functional projections and their subjects in Turkish clauses. In The verb in Turkish [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 44], E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (ed.), 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K.
2006 Interaction and syntactic priming: English L2 speakers’ production of dative constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 179–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A.
2006 Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning 56: 693–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30: 31–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Trofimovich, P.
2009 Using Priming Methods in Second Language Research. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, K. & Chaikitmongkol, W.
2010 Collaborative syntactic priming activities and EFL learners’ production of wh-questions. Canadian Modern Language Review 66: 817–842. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J. & Branigan, H.P.
1998 The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39: 633–651. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 136–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J. & Ferreira, V.S.
2008 Structural priming: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin 134 (3): 427–459. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, M.C. & Lombardi, L.
1998 Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 38: 265–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, C.
2003 Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition 89: 179–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schoonbaert, S., Hartsuiker, R.J. & Pickering, M.J.
2007 The representation of lexical and syntactic information in bilinguals: Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 56: 153–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shin, J.-A. & Christianson, K.
2012 Structural priming and second language learning. Language Learning 62: 931–964. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B.
2006 Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weber, K. & Indefrey, P.
2009 Shared syntactic information in German-English bilinguals: An fMRI repetition suppression study. Neuroimage 46: 1164–1172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Mercan, Gözde & Annette Hohenberger
2019. Structural priming in the production of Turkish possessive noun phrases and noun clauses. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 3:S1 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Romano, Francesco Bryan
2020. Ultimate attainment in heritage language speakers: Syntactic and morphological knowledge of Italian accusative clitics. Applied Psycholinguistics 41:2 ► pp. 347 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.