Cover not available
Part of
Second Language Acquisition of Turkish
Edited by Ayşe Gürel
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 59] 2016
► pp. 333–346

Conclusion

Emerging issues in the acquisition of L2 Turkish and pedagogical considerations

| Bogaziçi University
Published online: 25 May 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.59.13gur
References
Chang, F., Dell, G.S., Bock, J.K., & Griffin, Z.M
2000 Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29: 217–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M. & Silva, R
2010 Morphological structure in native and non-native language processing. Language Learning 60(1): 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R
1998 Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 42–63. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M
2005 What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning 55: 1–25 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C
1991 Second language acquisition does make a difference: evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13: 431–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H.C. & Burt, M.K
1974 Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24: 37–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R
1977 Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning 27: 315–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Typological markedness and second language phonology. In Phonology and Second Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 36], J.G. Hansen Edwards & M. L. Zampini (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R., Bell, L., & Nelson, D
1988 On the generalization of relative clause instruction in the acquisition of English as a second language. Applied Linguistics 9: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R
1990 Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1993 Second language acquisition and the structural syllabus. TESOL Quarterly 27: 91–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly 40(1): 83–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Philp, J., Reinders, H., & Erlam, R
2009 Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gass, S.M
1979 Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Learning 29: 327–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S
1982 From theory to practice. In On TESOL’ 81. M. Hines & W. Rutherford (eds), 120–139. Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B
1997 Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In the Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, E. Hughes & A. Greenhill (eds), 257–268. Boston MA: Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hulstijn, J.H., & de Graaff, R
1994 Under what conditions does explicit knowledge of a second language facilitate the acquisition of implicit knowledge? A research proposal. AILA Review 11: 97–112.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. & Schmidt, R
1996 Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 149–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, E. & Comrie, B
1977 Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 63–99.Google Scholar
Krashen, S
1977 Some issues relating to the Monitor Model. In On TESOL ‘77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice, H.D. Brown, C. Yorio & R. Crymes (eds), 144–158.Washington DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
1981 Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S.D
1982 Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1994 The input hypothesis and its rivals. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Language, N. Ellis (ed.), 45–77. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lado, R
1957 Linguistics Across Cultures. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D
2000 Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, J. Archibald (eds.), 102–29.Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In The Role of Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zobl & H. Goodluck (eds), 106–140. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2009 Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A
2008 Syntactic priming and ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 30, 31–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M
1981 On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F
2002 Second language acquisition (SLA) research: its significance for learning and teaching issues. Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies Good Practice Guide. [URL] (15 November 2015).
2013 Theoretical approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 46–70. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M
1994 Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: implications for bilingualism. In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Second Languages, N. Ellis (ed.), 393–419. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M
1985 Learnability and syllabus construction. In Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition, K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (eds), 23–76. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Prévost, P. & White L
2000 Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L
2012 Psycholinguistic techniques and resources in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research 28: 113–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P
1996 Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 27–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roever, C
2005 Testing ESL Pragmatics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A
1996 L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R
2008 Meaning in the Second Language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2009) , M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (eds), 280–294. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
2014 The bottleneck of second language acquisition. Foreign Language Teaching and Research 46(4): 543–559.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. & Ivanov, I
2011 A more careful look at the syntax–discourse interface. Lingua 121: 637–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A
2003 Near-nativeness. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Daughty & M.H. Long (eds), 130–151. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M
2008 Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly 42: 181−207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N. & Tomita, Y
2010 Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning 60(2): 263–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L
1987 Markedness and second language acquisition: The question of transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 261–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1989 Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 1]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Adverb placement in second language acquisition: some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research 7:133–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003a On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & M.H. Long (eds), 19–42. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. & Evans, J
1998 What kind of focus and on which forms? In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & J. Williams (eds), 139–155. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Zobl, H
1983 Markedness and the projection problem. Language Learning 33: 292–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar