Chapter published in:
Studies in Chinese and Japanese Language Acquisition: In honor of Stephen Crain
Edited by Mineharu Nakayama, Yi-ching Su and Aijun Huang
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 60] 2017
► pp. 107–126

Interpretation of bound pronouns by learners of Japanese Sign Language

| Keio University
| University of Connecticut
This study deals with the interpretation of bound pronouns by hearing learners of Japanese Sign Language (JSL). It is the first attempt to investigate JSL second language (L2) acquisition from a theoretical perspective. The Overt Pronoun Constraint (OPC) states that an overt pronoun can be bound by a referential NP, but not by an operator (including quantifiers and Wh-elements). JSL, as well as Japanese, allows an overt pronoun to corefer with a referential NP. However, (at least in some cases) the overt pronoun can be bound by a Wh-operator in JSL, but never in Japanese. A Truth-Value Judgment Task (TVJT) study was conducted, with different levels of Japanese-speaking learners of JSL, to observe if the OPC applies to a L1-L2 pair in different modalities, with different OPC status. The results showed that there was an anti-OPC effect among beginners, which lessened somewhat for intermediate learners.
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.60.06mat
References

References

Chen Pichler, D. & Koulidobrova, E.
2016 Acquisition of sign language as a second language (L2). In The Oxford Handbook of Deaf Studies in Language: Research, Policy, and Practice, M. Marschark & P. Elizabeth Spencer (eds), 218–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crain, S.
1991 Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 597–650. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, S. & McKee, C.
1985 The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. NELS 15: 94–110. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Crain, S. & Thornton, R.
1998 Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments on the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, O., van der Kooij, E., Ros, J. & De Hoop, H.
2009 Topic agreement in NGT (Sign Language of the Netherlands). The Linguistic Review 26: 355–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S.D.
1996 The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98: 103–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. & Rosen, S.T.
1990 Knowledge and obedience: The developmental status of the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21: 187–222.Google Scholar
Hoji, H.
1991 Kare. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: In Honor of Prof . S.-Y. Kuroda, R. Ishihara & C. Georgopoulos (eds), 287–304. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ichida, Y., Namba, Y., Fushihara, M., Miyake, M. & Yoshii, M.
2001 Nihon shuwa bogo washa jinko tokei no kokoromi (A preliminary statistics of the population of the native signers of Japanese Sign Language). Paper presented in the 27th annual meeting of Japanese Association for Sign Language Studies.Google Scholar
Ichida, Y.
2010 Introduction to Japanese Sign Language: Iconicity in language. In Studies in Language Sciences 9, M. Hirawaka, S. Inagaki, S. Arita, Y.G. Butler, K. Horie, E. Hauser, Y. Shirai & J. Tsubakita (eds), 3–32. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kahraman, B. & Nakayama, M.
2015 Interpretations of kare/kanojo by Turkish speaking learners of Japanese. Ars Linguistica 21: 18–38.Google Scholar
Kanda, K., Kimura, T. & Hara, D.
2008 Nihon no rousha jinko no suikei (An estimate of the deaf population in Japan). Paper presented at the 34th annual meeting of Japanese Association for Sign Language Studies.Google Scholar
Kanno, K.
1997 The acquisition of null and overt pronominals in Japanese by English speakers. Second Language Acquisition 5: 317–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H.
2011 Nihon shuwa to nihongo taio shuwa: Aida ni aru fukai tani (Japanese sign language and signed Japanese: A deep gap between them). Tokyo: Seikatsu Shoin.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E.
2012 When the Quiet Surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of Argument Omission in the Speech of ASL English Bilinguals. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E. 2013 Some arguments against the DP in ASL. A paper presented at Paris 8: Langues avec articles – langues sans articles.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E. & Lillo-Martin, D.
2016 A ‘point’ of inquiry: The case of the (non-) pronominal IX in ASL. In The Impact of Pronominal Form on Interpretation, P. Grosz & P. Patel-Grosz (eds), 221–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y.
1965 Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D. & Klima, E.
1990 Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Vol. 1, S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds), 191–210. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, D.
1997 The Structure of Determiner Phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Masumoto, A.
2008 Overt Pronouns and Bound Variable Reading in L2 Japanese. MA thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, K.
2015 Nihon shuwa de manabu shuwa gengogaku no kiso (Foundations of sign language linguistics with a special reference to Japanese Sign Language). Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Meier, R.P. & Lillo-Martin, D.
2013 The points of language. Humana.mente: Journal of Philosophical Studies 24: 151–176.Google Scholar
Montalbetti, M.
1984 After Binding: On the Interpretation of Pronouns. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Oka, N. & Akahori, H.
2011 Nihon shuwa no shikumi (Structure of Japanese sign language). Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Padden, C.A.
1988 Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language [Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics]. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Pimentel, C. & Nakayama, M.
2012 Pronominal interpretations in L2 Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 28: 111–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J.
2009 Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax – pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 951–973. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, M.
2007 Notes on East Asian argument ellipsis. Language Research 43: 203–227.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D.
2006 Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schlenker, P.
2013 Anaphora: Insights from Sign Language (Summary). 　 https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/philippeschlenkerhome/Google Scholar
Uchibori, A. & Matsuoka, K.
2013 Some observations on wh-clauses in Japanese Sign Language. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 29: 17–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, L.
2003 On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C. Doughty & M. Long (eds), 19–42. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar