Chapter 3
Acquisition of nominal compounds in Russian
This chapter discusses early noun compound acquisition in the morphologically rich, but relatively compound-poor Russian language, reflected in lower frequency of compounds in CDS and CS. The results are based on longitudinal data of five typically-developing monolingual children and their caregivers, analysing first emergence, the development of different compound patterns, productivity, frequency, simplicity and transparency of compounds. Russian children start to acquire compounds quite early (at the beginning of the protomorphology stage), with productive and semantically transparent interfixed patterns (‘X+VERB’, later ‘X+NOUN’). The compound frequency in CDS depends not only on the target-system productivity of a pattern, but also on individual preferences and the topic of conversation. The simplicity of a pattern appears to have no impact on early acquisition.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Russian compounding: Main characteristics
- 1.1.1Formation and usage
- 1.1.2Semantics, structure and accentual features of compounds
- 1.1.3Compound ‘candidates’ for early emergence in adult–child conversation
- 2.The data and method
- 3.Early development of compounds in Russian CS
- 3.1Emergence of the earliest compounds
- 3.2Development of compounding
- 3.3Simplicity and transparency in compound acquisition
- 3.4Individual features of compound repertoire in CS
- 3.5Productive use of compounds
- 3.6.Productivity and frequency in compound acquisition
- 3.6.1Influence of target-language
- 3.6.2Influence of ‘compound input’: Quantitative analysis
- 4.Lexical typology
- 5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (31)
References
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V.. 2013. Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect. Estonian Papers in Applied Linguistics 9: 23–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Argus, R., Kazakovskaya, V. & Laalo, K.. 2014. Acquisition of compounds in typologically different languages: Evidence from Finnish, Estonian and Russian. Paper presented at the 13th IASCL, Amsterdam.
Berko, J.. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.. (eds). 2003. Introduction. In Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies on Language Acquisition 21], D. Bittner, W. U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), vii–xxxvii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buceva, T. N. & Levašov, E. A. (eds). 2014. Novye slova i značenia: Slovar’-spravočnik po materialam pressy i literatury 90-x godov XX veka (New words and meanings), V 3-x tomax. St. Petersburg: Dmitrij Bulanin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dressler, W. U. 2007. Introduction. In Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112], S. Laaha & S. Gillis (eds), 3–9. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M. & Klampfer, S.. 2003. How does a child detect morphology? Evidence from production. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds), 391–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gabdreeva, N. V. & Gurčiani, M. T. 2012. Slovar’ kompozitov russkogo jazyka novejšego perioda (The Dictionary of Russian composites during recent times). Moscow: FLINTA; Nauka (Science).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gagarina, N. & Voeikova, M.. 2009. Acquisition of case and number in Russian. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition [Studies on Language Acquisition 30], U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (eds), 179–215. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gvozdev, A. N. 1995. Usvoenie det’mi zvukovoj storony russkogo jazyka (The Acquisition of Russian Phonetics by Children). St. Petersburg: Akcident.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gudilova, S. V. 2005. Produktivnye tipy obrazovania složnyx slov v sovremennom russkom jazyke (na materiale neologizmov vtoroj poloviny XX veka) (Productive Types of Compounding in the Modern Russian Language (Based on the Material of Neologisms of the Second Half of the XX Century)). PhD dissertation, Moskovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet (Moscow State University).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Izotov, V. P. & Pan’uškin, V. V. 1997. Neuzual’nye sposoby slovoobrazovania (Unusual Ways of Word Formation). Orel: Orlovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet (Orel State University).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kadlesová, A., Mertins, B., Nagy, M. & Donevska, S.. 2014. Identification of compound constituents in Chech preschool children. Paper presented at the 13th IASCL, Amsterdam.
Libben, G.. 1998. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language 61: 30–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lopatin, V. V. 2005/1980. Slovoobrazovanie imen suščestvitel’nyx (Nominal word formation). In Russkaja Grammatika, T. 1: Fonetika, fonologia, udarenie, slovoobrazovanie, morfologia (Russian Grammar. Phonetics, Phonology, Stress, Intonation, Word Formation, Morphology), N. U. Švedova (ed.), 141–168. Мoscow: Nauka (Science).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lopatin, V. V. & Uluxanov, I. S. 2005/1980. Slovoobrazovanie. Osnovnye ponjatia (Word formation. Basic concepts). In Russkaja Grammatika, T. 1: Fonetika, fonologia, udarenie, slovoobrazovanie, morfologia (Phonetics, Phonology, Stress, Intonation, Word formation, Morphology), N. U. Švedova (ed.), 123–142. Мoscow: Nauka (Science).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B.. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 2 Vols. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mel’čuk, I. A. 1998. Kurs obščej morfologii (A Course in General Morphology), V 2-x tomax. Moscow & Vienna: Yazyki russkoj kul’tury, Venskij slavističeskij al’manax, Izdatel’skaja gruppa ‘Progress’ (Languages of Russian Culture, Vienna Slavic Almanac, Publishing Group ‘Progress’).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nemčenko, V. N. 1984. Sovremennyj russkij jazyk. Slovoobrazovanie (The Modern Russian Language. Word Formation). Moscow: Vysšaja škola (Higher School).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scalise, S.. 1984. Interplay between morphological rules. In Generative Morphology, S. Scalise (ed.), 101–133. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scalise, S.. (ed.). 1992. The morphology of compounding. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 175–200.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scalise, S. & Bisetto, A.. 2005. The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4: 319–332.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skl’arevskaja, G. N. (ed.). 2001. Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka. Jazykovye izmenenia konca ХХ stoletia (A Dictionary of the Russian Language. Language Changes of the Late Twentieth Century). Moscow: Astrel’.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stephany, U. & Voeikova, M.. 2009. Introduction. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition [Studies on Language Acquisition 30], U. Stephany & M. Voeikova (eds.), 1–14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tixonov, A. N. 2002. Morfemno-orfografičeskij slovar’ (The Morphemic-orthographic Dictionary). <[URL]>
Tixonov, A. N. 2003. Slovoobrazovatel’nyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka (The Word Formation Dictionary of Russian), V 2-x tomax. Moskow: АСТ.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vasilevskaja, Е.А. 1962. Slovosloženie v russkom jazyke (Compounding in the Russian Language). Мoscow: Učpedgiz.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xarčenko, V. K. & Ozerova, E. G. 1999. Složnye slova v detskoj reči (Compounds in child language). Belgorod: Belgorodskij universitet (Belgorog State University).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zemskaja, E. A. 1992. Slovoobrazovanie kak dejatel’nost’ (Word formation as an activity). Мoscow: Nauka (Science).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zemskaja, E. A. 2000. Aktivnye processy sovremennogo slovoproizvodstva (Active processes in modern word formation). In Russkij jazyk konca XX stoletia (1985–1995) (Russian language in the late XX century (1985–1995)), E. A. Zemskaja (ed.), 90–141. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury (Languages of Slavic Culture).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Kazakovskaya, Victoria & Maria D. Voeikova
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Reili Argus, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Johanna Johansen Ijäs, Victoria V. Kazakovskaya, Klaus Laalo & Evangelia Thomadaki
2019.
First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami.
Morphology 29:3
► pp. 409 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
V. Kazakovskaya, Victoria
2019.
Child nominal derivation and parental input: Evidence from morphology-rich Russian.
International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education 7:1
► pp. 121 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.