Part of
Nominal Compound Acquisition
Edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61] 2017
► pp. 231249
Aksu-Koç, A. & Ketrez, F. N
2003Early verbal morphology in Turkish: Emergence of inflections. In Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition [Studies in Language Acquision 21], D. Bittner, W. U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 27–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R. A
2009Acquisition of compound constructions. In Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 298–322. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Çakır, C.
2000On non-final stress in Turkish simplex words. In Studies on Turkish and Turkic Languages [Turcologica 46], A. Göksel & C. Kerslake (eds), 3–10. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dede, M.
1978A syntactic and semantic analysis of Turkish nominal compounds. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Dressler, W. U. & Karpf, A.
1995The theoretical relevance of pre- and protomorphology in language acquisition. Yearbook of Morphology 1994: 99–122.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K.
2010First language acquisition of compounds with special emphasis on early German child language. In Cross-disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], S. Scalise & I. Vogel (eds), 323–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory. Irregularity, Analogy and Frequency. Selected Papers from the 14th International Morphology Meeting [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], F. Kiefer, M. Ladanyi & P. Siptar (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö
1990Coinage of words in child’s lexicon in acquiring Turkish. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, S. Koç (ed.), 27–39. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Göksel, A.
1988Bracketing paradoxes in Turkish nominal compounds. In Studies on Turkish Linguistics, S. Koç (ed.), 287–298. Ankara: METU Press.Google Scholar
2009Compounds in Turkish. Lingue e Linguaggio 2: 213–236.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Haznedar, B.
2007Remarks on compounding in Turkish. Ms, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
2008Türkçe tamlamaların yapısı: Bir veri tabanı çalışması (Structure of Turkish compounds: A data base study). XXI.Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri (Proceedings of the 21th National Linguistics Conference), Y. Aksan & M. Aksan (eds), 362–374. Mersin: Mersin Üniversitesi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Kamalı, B. & İkizoğlu, D.
2012Against compound stress in Turkish. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics. Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ketrez, F. N
1999Early Verbs and the Acquisition of Turkish Argument Structure. MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
2007Alignment vs. linearity constraints in a Turkish child’s speech. Dilbilim Araştırmaları 2007: 77–88.Google Scholar
2015Çocuk dilinde tamlamalar ve bileşik sözcükler (Compounds in child language). In 28. Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildiriler Kitapçığı (Proceedings of the 28th National Linguistics Conference), F. Karahan (ed.), 205–220. Ankara: Ayrıntı Basım, Yayın ve Matbaacılık.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F. N. & Aksu-Koç, A.
2007The (scarcity of) diminutives in Turkish child language. In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43], I. Savickienė & W. U. Dressler (eds), 279–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Early nominal morphology: Emergence of case and number. In The Development of Number and Case in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, M. Voeikova & U. Stephany (eds), 15–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol.1: Transcription, Format and Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Öztürk, B. & Taylan, E.
2016Possessive constructions in Turkish. Lingua 182: 88–108.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ralli, A.
2013Compounding and its locus of realization: Evidence from Greek and Turkish. Word Structure 6(2): 181–200.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sezer, E.
1983On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies 5: 61–69.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I
1985Crosslinguistic evidence for the language making capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tat, D.
2013Word syntax of nominal compounds: Internal and aphasiological evidence from Turkish. PhD dissertation, the University of Arizona.
van Schaaik, G.
2002The Noun in Turkish. Its Argument Structure and the Compounding Straitjacket. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Yükseker, H.
1987Turkish nominal compounds. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 83–102.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Ketrez, F. Nihan & Ayhan Aksu-Koç
Ralli, Angela
2020. Matter versus pattern borrowing in compounding: Evidence from the Asia Minor Greek dialectal variety. Morphology 30:4  pp. 423 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.