Cover not available
Part of
Nominal Compound Acquisition
Edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61] 2017
► pp. 287–305

Chapter 13
Discussion and outlook

| | University of Vienna
| | Istanbul Bilgi University
| | University of Lausanne
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Emergence of compounds and compounding patterns
  • 3.Emergence of neologistic compounds
  • 4.Typological characteristics of the languages concerned
  • 5.Lexical typology and wealth of compounding
  • 6.Development of subtypes of compounds
    • 6.1Word classes of compound constituents
    • 6.2Morphotactic transparency
    • 6.3Rise of complexity
  • 7.Relations between CDS and CS
    • 7.1Errors
    • 7.2To what extent does CS follow CDS?
    • 8.Theoretical and methodological consequences for acquisition studies
    • 9.Theoretical consequences for the study of compounds in general
  • 10.Outlook
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.61.14dre
References
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. I
1985 The acquisition of Turkish. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 839–878. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M
2011 Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Argus, R., Johansen, Ijäs J. & Laalo, K.
2014 Liitsõnade omandamine eesti, soome ja saami keeles: ühist ja erinevat (Acquisition of compounds in Estonian, Finnish and Saami: similarities and differences). Keel ja Kirjandus 7-8: 1–21.Google Scholar
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V.
2013 Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Society of Applied Linguistics) 9: 23–42.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.
(eds) 2003 Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Acquisition 21]. Berlin: De Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.
1998 Children’s first verbs in Tzeltal: Evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics 36: 713–753.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1980 Rules and Representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Buttke, S. & Wiese, B.
1996 Compounding and inflection in German child language. Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 115–142.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G.
1992 Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45: 225–255.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A
2004 Morphology in first language acquisition. In Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (eds), 1795–1805. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V. & Hecht, B
1982 Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12(1): 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabašinskienė, I.
2010 Acquisition of compounds in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 1: 25–78.Google Scholar
de León, L.
1999 Verb roots and caregiver speech in early Tzotzil (Mayan) acquisition. In Cognition and function in language, B. Fox, D. Jurafsky & L. Michaelis (eds), 99–119. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U
1999 Why collapse morphological concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1021.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Word-formation in Natural Morphology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (eds), 267–284. New York, NY: Springer.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 A typological approach to first language acquisition. In Language Acquisition across Linguistic and Cognitive Systems [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 52], M. Kail & M. Hickmann (eds), 109–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 The rise of complexity in inflectional morphology. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47: 159–176.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kastovky, D., Pfeiffer, O. E. & Rainer, F.
(eds) 2005 Morphology and its Demarcation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K.
2012 Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory. (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi & P. Siptár (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Stark, J. A., Pons, C., Nault, K., Jarema, G. & Libben, G.
2011 Interfix knowledge is fixed: Evidence from the composition of German compounds by persons with aphasia. Anzeiger der phil.-hist . Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 136(2): 5–30.Google Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö
1990 Coinage of words in child’s lexicon in acquiring Turkish. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, S. Koç (ed), 27–39. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A. & Gillis, S.
2007 Discussion and conclusion. In S. Laaha & S. Gillis (eds), 67–71.Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N.
1998 Grenzfälle morphological Einheiten (Boundary instances of morphological units). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Harris, M.
1992 Language Experience and Early Language Development: From Input to Uptake. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1977 Der grammatische Aufbau der Kindersprache (The grammatical structure of child language) [Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vorträge (talks) G 218]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S. & Gillis, S.
(eds) 2007 Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
Labov, W
2014 The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner. In Advances in Sociophonetics, C. Celata & S. Calamai (eds), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Libben, G.
2014 The nature of compounds: A psychocentric view. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31: 8–25.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R.
1992 Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P.
(eds) 2009 Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lo Duca, M. G
1990 Creatività e regole: Studio sull'acquisizione della morfologia derivative dell'italiano (Creativity and Rules: Study on the Acquisition of Italian Derivational Morphology). Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mereu, L.
(ed.) 1999 Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 180]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K. & Karlsson, F.
(eds) 2008 Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E.
2006 Pre-school children’s acquisition of compounds. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, G. Libben & G. Jarema (eds), 96–125. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ninio, A.
2006 Syntactic development: lessons from complexity theory. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Gregynog Conference on Child Language.
Peters, A. M
1997 Language typology, prosody, and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 135–197. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U
(eds) 2007 The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I
1985 Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition II, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A
1977 Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. & Christofidou, A
2009 The emergence of nominal inflection in Greek. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. D. Voeikova (eds), 217–264. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stephany, U. & Thomadaki, E.
2016 Compounds in Early Greek first language acquisition – Including an onomasiological approach to lexical typology of Greek and German. Working Paper No. 60. General Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, University of Cologne.
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. D. & Noccetti, S.
(eds) 2015 Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D. & Dressler, W. U
2011 On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language 31: 461–479.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zurek, W. H
(ed.) 1990 Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar