Chapter published in:
Nominal Compound Acquisition
Edited by Wolfgang U. Dressler, F. Nihan Ketrez and Marianne Kilani-Schoch
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61] 2017
► pp. 287–305

Discussion and outlook

| | University of Vienna
| | Istanbul Bilgi University
| | University of Lausanne
Published online: 19 December 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.61.14dre
References

References

Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. I.
1985 The acquisition of Turkish. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 839–878. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M.
2011 Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argus, R., Johansen, Ijäs J. & Laalo, K.
2014 Liitsõnade omandamine eesti, soome ja saami keeles: ühist ja erinevat (Acquisition of compounds in Estonian, Finnish and Saami: similarities and differences). Keel ja Kirjandus 7-8: 1–21.Google Scholar
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V.
2013 Acquisition of compounds in Estonian and Russian: Frequency, productivity, transparency and simplicity effect. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Society of Applied Linguistics) 9: 23–42.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.
(eds) 2003 Development of Verb Inflection in First Language Acquisition: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Acquisition 21]. Berlin: De Gruyter.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P.
1998 Children’s first verbs in Tzeltal: Evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics 36: 713–753.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1980 Rules and Representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Marcus, G., Buttke, S. & Wiese, B.
1996 Compounding and inflection in German child language. Yearbook of Morphology 1995: 115–142.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Rothweiler, M., Woest, A. & Marcus, G.
1992 Regular and irregular inflection in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition 45: 225–255.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. & Berman, R. A.
2004 Morphology in first language acquisition. In Morphology. An International Handbook on Inflection and Word Formation, G. Booij, C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (eds), 1795–1805. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, E.V. & Hecht, B.
1982 Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12(1): 1–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabašinskienė, I.
2010 Acquisition of compounds in Lithuanian. Baltic Linguistics 1: 25–78.Google Scholar
de León, L.
1999 Verb roots and caregiver speech in early Tzotzil (Mayan) acquisition. In Cognition and function in language, B. Fox, D. Jurafsky & L. Michaelis (eds), 99–119. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U.
1999 Why collapse morphological concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 1021.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Word-formation in Natural Morphology. In Handbook of Word-Formation, P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (eds), 267–284. New York, NY: Springer.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 A typological approach to first language acquisition. In Language Acquisition across Linguistic and Cognitive Systems [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 52], M. Kail & M. Hickmann (eds), 109–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The rise of complexity in inflectional morphology. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47: 159–176.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kastovky, D., Pfeiffer, O. E. & Rainer, F.
(eds) 2005 Morphology and its Demarcation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 264]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Lettner, L. E. & Korecky-Kröll, K.
2012 Acquisition of German diminutive formation and compounding in a comparative perspective: Evidence for typology and the role of frequency. In Current Issues in Morphological Theory. (Ir)regularity, Analogy and Frequency [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 322], F. Kiefer, M. Ladányi & P. Siptár (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Stark, J. A., Pons, C., Nault, K., Jarema, G. & Libben, G.
2011 Interfix knowledge is fixed: Evidence from the composition of German compounds by persons with aphasia. Anzeiger der phil.-hist . Klasse der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 136(2): 5–30.Google Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö.
1990 Coinage of words in child’s lexicon in acquiring Turkish. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, S. Koç (ed), 27–39. Ankara: Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A. & Gillis, S.
2007 Discussion and conclusion. In S. Laaha & S. Gillis (eds), Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology, 67–71.Google Scholar
Fuhrhop, N.
1998 Grenzfälle morphological Einheiten (Boundary instances of morphological units). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Harris, M.
1992 Language Experience and Early Language Development: From Input to Uptake. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R.
1977 Der grammatische Aufbau der Kindersprache (The grammatical structure of child language) [Rheinisch-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vorträge (talks) G 218]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laaha, S. & Gillis, S.
(eds) 2007 Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112]. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
①
Labov, W.
2014 The sociophonetic orientation of the language learner. In Advances in Sociophonetics, C. Celata & S. Calamai (eds), 1–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Libben, G.
2014 The nature of compounds: A psychocentric view. Cognitive Neuropsychology 31: 8–25.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R.
1992 Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. & Štekauer, P.
(eds) 2009 Handbook of Compounding. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lo Duca, M. G.
1990 Creatività e regole: Studio sull'acquisizione della morfologia derivative dell'italiano (Creativity and Rules: Study on the Acquisition of Italian Derivational Morphology). Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Mereu, L.
(ed.) 1999 Boundaries of Morphology and Syntax [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 180]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, M., Sinnemäki, K. & Karlsson, F.
(eds) 2008 Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicoladis, E.
2006 Pre-school children’s acquisition of compounds. In The Representation and Processing of Compound Words, G. Libben & G. Jarema (eds), 96–125. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ninio, A.
2006 Syntactic development: lessons from complexity theory. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Gregynog Conference on Child Language.
Peters, A. M.
1997 Language typology, prosody, and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 135–197. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U.
(eds) 2007 The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1985 Crosslinguistic evidence for the language-making capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition II, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 1157–1256. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A.
1977 Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Stephany, U. & Christofidou, A.
2009 The emergence of nominal inflection in Greek. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. D. Voeikova (eds), 217–264. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stephany, U. & Thomadaki, E.
2016 Compounds in Early Greek first language acquisition – Including an onomasiological approach to lexical typology of Greek and German. Working Paper No. 60. General Linguistics, Institute of Linguistics, University of Cologne.
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. D. & Noccetti, S.
(eds) 2015 Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Xanthos, A., Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Stephany, U., Aksu-Koç, A., Christofidou, A., Gagarina, N., Hrzica, G., Ketrez, F. N., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Kovačević, M., Laalo, K., Palmović, M., Pfeiler, B., Voeikova, M. D. & Dressler, W. U.
2011 On the role of morphological richness in the early development of noun and verb inflection. First Language 31: 461–479.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zurek, W. H.
(ed.) 1990 Complexity, Entropy, and the Physics of Information. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar