Chapter published in:
On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 31–56

Discrimination of passive predicates by Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children

| Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ) | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
| Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ) | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
| Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio) | Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ) | Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
This paper investigates the discrimination of passive predicates by children acquiring Brazilian Portuguese. A truth-value judgment experiment is reported here which assesses 3–4- and 5–6-year-olds’ ability to discriminate eventive/stative and eventive/resultative predicates. The results show an adult-like performance as far as stative and resultative predicates are concerned. As for eventive predicates, children’s performance has not reached the adult-standard, though they do discriminate eventive from stative/resultative predicates. These results are discussed in relation to previous ones with children acquiring European Portuguese and Catalan (Estrela, 2013; Gavarró & Parramon, 2017). A developmental account is provided which aims at reconciling the present and previous results.
Keywords: language acquisition, adjectival passives, verbal passives, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the structure of adjectival passive sentences and its relation to eventive passives
  • 3.Previous results in favor of an adjectival interpretation of verbal passives
  • 4.Experimental study
    • Method
    • Results
    • Discussion
  • 5.A procedural account of the acquisition of passives
  • 6.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.62.03lim
References
Bencini, G., & Valian, V.
(2008) Abstract sentence representations in 3-year olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 97–113.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bever, T. G.
(1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C
(1998) A minimalist view on the passive. University of Connecticut, Papers in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Borer, H., & Wexler, K.
(1987) The maturation of syntax. In T. Roeper & E. Williams (Eds.), Parameter setting (pp. 123–172). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, H., & K. Wexler
(1992) Bi-unique relations and the maturation of grammatical principles. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 147–189.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, B.
(2013) By-phrases in passives and nominals. Syntax, 16(1), 1–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 32(2), 363–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caprin, C., & Guasti, M. T.
(2006) A cross-sectional study on the use of be in early Italian. In V. Torrens & L. Escobar (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages (pp. 117–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, C.
(2005) A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 289–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corrêa, L. M. S.
(2009) Bootstrapping language acquisition from a minimalist standpoint: On the identification of phi-features in Brazilian Portuguese. In A. Pires & J. Rothman (Eds.), Minimalist inquiries into child and adult language acquisition: Case studies across Portuguese (pp. 35–621). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Interface information and computational cost: An integrated procedural approach to language acquisition with some implications for SLI. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Crain, S., Thornton, R., & Murasugi, K.
(1987) Capturing the evasive passive. Paper presented at the 12th Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
(2009) Capturing the evasive passive. Language Acquisition, 16(2), 123–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J.
(2012) Developmental perspectives on the acquisition of the passive (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Demuth, K.
(1989) Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language, 65, 56–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Subject, topic and the Sesotho passive. Journal of Child Language, 17, 67–84.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Villiers, J. G., & De Villiers, P. A.
(1973) Development of the use of word order in comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2(4), 331–341.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A.
(2006) The early development of executive functions. In E. Bialystock & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Lifespan cognition. Mechanisms of change (pp. 9970–9995). Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I., & Oliveira, F.
(2010) Particípios resultativos. InTextos Seleccionados XXV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Porto: APL.Google Scholar
Embick, D.
(2004) On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 355–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estrela, A. P.
(2013) A aquisição da estrutura passiva em português europeu (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Nova de Lisboa.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F.
(2003) The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D., & Grodzinsky, Y.
(1998) Children’s passive: A view from the by phrase. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(2), 311–332.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A., & Parramon, X.
(2017) On the adjectival interpretation of passives in acquisition. Lingua, 185, 11–24 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C.
(2007) On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 544–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K.
(2000) What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274–279 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K.
(2006) Children’s passives and their resulting interpretation. In K. U. Deen, J. Nomura, B. Schulz, & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), The proceedings of the inaugural conference on generative approaches to language acquisition – North America (pp. 125–136). University of Connecticut Occasional Papers in Linguistics , 4.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Schmitz, M., Santelmann, L. M., & Weissenborn, J.
(2006) The recognition of discontinuous verbal dependencies by German 19-month olds: Evidence for lexical and structural influences on children’s early processing capacities. Language Learning and Development, 2(4), 277–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N., Martins, A. M., & Nunes, J.
(2008) Perception and causative structures in English and European Portuguese: Phi-feature agreement and the distribution of bare and prepositional infinitives. Syntax, 11, 198–222.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, M., Johnson, C., & Brooks, P. J.
(2000) From states to events: The acquisition of English passive participles. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 1–2.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, P. W., & Bertoncini, J.
(1988) Viewing the development of speech perception as an innately guided learning process. Language and Speech, 31, 217–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kline, M., & Demuth, K.
(2010) Factors facilitating implicit learning: The case of the Sesotho passive. Language Acquisition, 17(4), 220–234.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koring, L., Sangers, N., & Wexler, K.
(2015) Who is the agent when it is left implicit? Paper presented at the 12th Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA) 2015.Google Scholar
Lima Júnior, J. C., & Augusto, M. R. A.
(2012) Aspectos estruturais de sentenças passivas relevantes para questões em aquisição da linguagem: uma análise do português. In Anais do VIII ENAL/II EIAL Encontro Inter/Nacional sobre Aquisição da Linguagem em 2011 (pp. 186–199). Juiz de Fora: Programa de Pós-Graduação.Google Scholar
(2014) The relevance of aspectual and semantic features for the comprehension of short passive sentences involving agentive and non-agentive verbs. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2015) Is ‘smuggling’ really necessary? The most recent analyses of passive sentences reconsidered in terms of phasehood and cyclic movement. ReVEL, special edition, 9 www​.revel​.inf​.br Google Scholar
(2017) Passive P and the distinction between eventive, resultative, and stative passives. Diadorim, special edition, 27–52.Google Scholar
Lima Júnior, J. C., & Corrêa, L. M. S.
(2015) A natureza do custo computacional na compreensão de passivas: um estudo experimental com adultos. Letras de Hoje, 50(1), 91–101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Sentence-image mapping and the relevance of temporal/aspectual information in the comprehension of passive sentences by children. In M. Carvalho Bezerra Cavalcante et al. (Eds.), Questões em aquisição da linguagem e psicolinguística: fonologia e prosódia, língua de sinais, sintaxe e processamento (pp. 575–589). João Pessoa: Mídia Gráfica e Editora ltda.Google Scholar
(2017) The perception of discontinuous dependencies by 18-month-olds: On the process of acquiring periphrastic verbal passives. Paper presented at the 42nd Boston University Congress of Language Development (BUCLD), Boston.Google Scholar
Manetti, C.
(2012) The acquisition of Italian passives: Evidence from comprehension, production and syntactic priming studies (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Siena.Google Scholar
(2013) On the production of passives in Italian: evidence form an elicited production task and a syntactic priming study with preschool children. In S. Bainz, N. Goldman, R. Hawkes (Eds.), BUCLD 37 Proceedings Online Supplement (pp. 1–16).Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., Kuczaj, S. A., Fox, D. C., & Chalkley, M.
(1979) Some empirical issues in the acquisition of transformational relations. In W. A. Collins (Ed.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 1–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Maratsos, M., Fox, D., Becker, J., & Chalkley, M. A.
(1985) Semantic restrictions on children’s passives. Cognition, 56, 271–279.Google Scholar
McIntyre, A.
(2012) Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In A. Alexiadou & F. Schaefer (Eds.), Non-canonical passives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Menuzzi, S.
(2002) The acquisition of passives in English and Brazilian Portuguese: regularities despite the input In J. Costa & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (GALA). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística.Google Scholar
Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F., & Sorace, A.
(2012) Are children’s early passives semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 568–587.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D.
(2000) The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. L., & Demuth, K.
(1996) Signal to syntax: An overview. In J. L. Morgan & K. Demuth (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
O’Brien, K., Grolla, E., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(2006) Long passives are understood by young children. In D. Bamman, T. Magniskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 441–451). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., Lebeaux, D., & Frost, L.
(1987) Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive. Cognition, 26, 195–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, F. M., Thomas, M. S., & Price, C. J.
(2010) Neuronal Activation for Semantically Reversible Sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(6), 1283–1298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, E. S., & Marcilese, M.
(2014) Executive control in children’s comprehension of ordinal modifier phrases. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M.J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Rubin, M. C. B. P.
(2009) The passive in 3- and 4-year-olds. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(5), 435–446.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W.
(1998) Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing. Cognition, 69, 105–134.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.
(1966) Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 219–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W., & Hyams, N.
(2015) Minimality effect in children's passives. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 343–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Strohner, J., & Nelson, K. E.
(1974) The young child’s development of sentence comprehension: Influence of event probability, nonverbal context, syntactic form, and strategies. Child Development, 45, 564–576.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sudhalter, V., & Braine, M.
(1985) How does comprehension of passive develop? a comparison of actional and experiential verbs. Journal of Child Language, 12, 455–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terzi, A., & Wexler, K.
(2002) A-Chains and s-homophones in children’s grammar: Evidence from Greek passives. Paper presented at NELS 32, 2002.Google Scholar
Tincoff, R., Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W.
(2000) Auxiliary verb learning and 18-month-olds’ acquisition of morphological relationships. In S. C. Howell, S. A. Fish & T. Keith-Lucas (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.726–737). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Verrips, M.
(1996) Potatoes must peel: The acquisition of the Dutch passive (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., Verin, L., Tagliaferro, L., & Cardinaletti, A.
(2013) The comprehension of (eventive) verbal passives by Italian preschool age children. In Advances in language acquisition. Proceedings of GALA (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition) 2011. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Google Scholar
Volpato, F., Verin, L., & Cardinaletti, A.
(2014) The acquisition of passives in Italian: Auxiliaries and answering strategies in an experiment of elicited production. In J. Costa, A. Fiéis, M. J. Freitas, M. Lobo, & A. L. Santos (Eds.), New directions in the acquisition of Romance languages. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Wasow, T.
(1977) Transformations and the lexicon. In P. Culicover, T. Wasow, & J. Bresnan (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 327–360). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K.
(2002) Lenneberg’s dream: Learning, normal language development and specific language impairment. In J. Schaeffer & Y. Levy (Eds.), Language competence across populations: Towards a definition of specific language impairment (pp. 11–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2004) Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 48, 159–209.Google Scholar