Cover not available
Part of
On the Acquisition of the Syntax of Romance
Edited by Anna Gavarró
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 62] 2018
► pp. 147–168

Syntactic awareness of clitic pronouns and articles in French-speaking children with autism, specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia

 | University of Milano-Bicocca | ARC-CCD Macquarie University
 | University of Geneva
 | University of Geneva
The performance of 122 children on syntactic awareness of clitics and articles in French was examined. Three clinical groups (21 children with ASD, 22 children with SLI, 23 children with DD) and a group of 56 younger children with TD were studied. On the article task, children with ASD obtained lower scores than all the other groups and on the clitic task they performed worse than children with DD. In addition, children with ASD and low expressive language displayed more difficulty than children with SLI on the clitic task. Thus, a subgroup of children with ASD is taxed in an area that is critical to identify children with SLI.
Keywords: clitics, article, syntactic awareness, ASD, SLI, DD
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Morphosyntax in children with ASD and children with DD
    • 2.1Morphosyntax in children with ASD
    • 2.2Morphosyntax in children with DD
  • 3.Our study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Experimental procedure and materials
      • Syntactic awareness of articles
      • Syntactic awareness of 3rd person direct object clitic pronouns
    • 3.3Results
  • 4.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.62.07gua
References (61)
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). American Psychiatric Association task force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV-TR. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 513–517.
. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Branchini, C. Barbieri, L., & Guasti, M. T. (2014). Failure to produce direct object clitic pronouns as a clinical marker of SLI in school-aged Italian speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 28, 639–663.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Pagliarini, E., Perugini, M., Barbieri, L., & Guasti, M. T. (2016). Morphosyntax and logical abilities in Italian poor readers: The problem of SLI misidentification. First Language, 36, 295–315.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, F., Panzeri, F., Molteni, B., Magazù, S., & Guasti, M. T. (2017). The comprehension of Italian relative clauses in poor readers and in children with Specific Language Impairment. Glossa, 2, 1–25.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Avram, L., Sevcenco, A., & Stoicescu I. (2013). Clinical markers of specific language impairment and developmental dyslexia in Romanian: the case of Accusative clitics (Unpublished manuscript). University of Bucharest.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Hey! It was just a joke! Understanding propositions and propositional attitudes by normally developing children, and children with autism. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 37, 174–178.Google Scholar
Barshalom, E. G., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1993). A comparison of comprehension and production abilities of good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 197–227.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartak, L., Rutter, M., & Cox, A. (1975). A comparative study of infantile autism and specific developmental receptive language disorder: The children. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 127–145.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolini U., Caselli M., Deevy P., & Leonard, L. (2002). Specific language impairment in Italian: The first steps in the search for a clinical marker. International Journal Language and Communication Disorders, 37, 77–93.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bortolini, U., Arfé, B., Caselli, M. C., Degasperi, L., Deevy, P. & Leonard, L. B. (2006). Clinical marker for specific language impairment in Italian: the contribution of clitics and non-word repetition. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 41, 695–712.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantiani, C., Lorusso, M. L., Perego, P., Molteni, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2013). Event-related potentials reveal anomalous morphosyntactic processing in developmental dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1135–1162.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cantiani, C., M.L. Lorusso, P. Perego, M. Molteni, & M. T. Guasti (2015) Developmental Dyslexia with and without language impairment: ERPs reveal qualitative differences in morphosyntactic processing. Developmental Neuropsychology. 40:291-312. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Chin, Y. H. & Bernard-Opitz, V. (2000). Teaching conversational skills to children with autism: effect on the development of a theory of mind. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 569–583.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen, D. J., & Volkmar, F. R. (1997). Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Conti-Ramsden, G., & Botting, N. (1999). Classification of children with specific language impairment: Longitudinal considerations. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 1195–1204.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrleman, S., & Delage, H. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder and specific language impairment: Overlaps in syntactic profiles. Language Acquisition, 23, 361–386.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2011). Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua, 121, 367–382.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavarró, A. (2012). Third person clitic production and omission in Romance SLI. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes, & P. Larrañaga (Eds.), Pronouns and clitics in early language (pp.79–104). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, A., Fein, D., &Naigles, L. R. (2012). Comprehension of wh-questions precedes their production in typical development and autism spectrum disorders. Autism Research, 5, 109–123.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T. (2005). Comprehension and production of French object clitics by child second language learners and children with specific language impairment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 363–391.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., Vernice, M., Barbieri, L., & Arosio, F. (2015). Language disorders in children with developmental dyslexia. In S. Stavrakaki (Ed.), Advances in research on specific language impairment. (pp.35–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happé, F. (1995). Understanding minds and metaphors: Insights from the study of figurative language in autism. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10, 275–295.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, C., Rizzi, L., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). On the acquisition of subject and object clitics in French. In H. Clahsen (Ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition (pp.309–334). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howlin, P. (1984). The acquisition of grammatical morphemes in autistic children: A critique and replication of the findings of Bartolucci, Pierce, and Streiner, 1980. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 14, 127–136.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C., Nash, L., Rigaut, C., & Gérard, C. L. (1998). Determiners and clitic pronouns in French-speaking children with SLI. Language acquisition, 7, 113-160.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. & Tuller, L. (2008). Specific language impairment in French. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), Studies in French applied linguistics (pp.97–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jensen de López, K., Schroeder, K., & Gavarró, A. (2018). Successful passive sentence comprehension among Danish adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 3. 2396941518761239.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Khomsi, A., Khomsi, J., Parbeau-Guéno, A. & Pasquet, F. (2007). Bilan informatisé de langage oral au Cycle III et au collège (BILO3C). Paris: Editions du CPA.Google Scholar
Kjelgaard, M., & H. Tager-Flusberg. (2010). An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 287–308.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwok, E. Y. L., Brown, H. M., Smyth, R. E., &Cardy, J. O. (2015). Meta-analysis of receptive and expressive language skills in autism spectrum disorder. Research Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 202–222.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonard, L. B., Bortolini, U., Caselli, M. C., McGregor, K. K. & Sabbadini, L. (1992). Morphological deficits in children with specific language impairment: The status of features in the underlying grammar. Language Acquisition, 2, 151–179.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, C., Risi, S., Di Lavore, P., Shulman, C., Thurm, A., & Pickles, A. (2006). Autism from two to nine. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 694–701.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C. R., Harcourt-Brown, S., Ramus, F., & Van der Lely, H. K. J. (2009). The link between prosody and language skills in children with specific language impairment (SLI) and/or dyslexia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 466–488.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, G. M., Hogben, J. H., Edwards, V. T., Heath, S. M., & Mengler, E. D. (2000). On the “specifics” of specific reading disability and specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 869–874.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Modyanova, N., Perovic, A., & Wexler, K. (2017). Grammar is differentially impaired in subgroups of autism spectrum disorders: Evidence from an investigation of Tense marking and morphosyntax. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
Paradis, J., Crago, M., & Genesee, F. (2003). Object clitics as a clinical marker of SLI in French: evidence from French–English bilingual children. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), BUCLD 27: Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.638–649). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Parisse, C. & Maillart, C. (2004). Développement morphosyntaxique des enfants ayant des troubles de développement du langage: Des données francophones. Enfance, 56, 21–26.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perovic, A., Modyanova, N., & Wexler, K. (2013). Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 813–835.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: Insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raven, J. C. (1998). The coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Reddy, V., E. Williams et al. (2002). Sharing humour and laughter in autism and Down's syndrome. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 219–242.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riches, N. G., Loucas, T., Baird, G., Charman, T., & Simonoff, E. (2010). Sentence repetition in adolescents with specific language impairments and autism: An investigation of complex syntax. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45, 47–60.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J. E., Roeleven, S., & Koster, C. (2004). Sensitivity to subject–verb agreement in spoken language in children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17, 333–347.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rispens, J. E., Been, P. H., & Zwarts, F. (2006). Brain responses to subject-verb agreement violations in spoken language in developmental dyslexia: an ERP study. Dyslexia, 12, 134-149.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, E. K., & Joanisse, M. F. (2010). Spoken sentence comprehension in children with dyslexia and language impairment: The role of syntax and working memory. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 141–165.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, J., Rice, M. L., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2004). Tense marking in children with autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 429–448.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Journal of Education, 189, 23–55.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1996). Current theory and research on language and communication in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 169–172.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Defining language phenotypes in autism. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 6, 219–224.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg, H., Calkins, S., Nolin, T., Baumberger, T., Anderson, M., & Chadwick-Dias, A. (1990). A longitudinal study of language acquisition in autistic and Downs syndrome children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 20, 1–21.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tager-Flusberg H., Paul, R., & Lord, C., (2005). Language and communication in autism. In F. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp.335–364). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Francis, K., & Kotsopoulou, A. (2012). Crosslinguistic differences in autistic children’s comprehension of pronouns: English vs. Greek. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), BUCLD 36: Proceedings of the 36th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.607–619). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Terzi, A., Marinis, T., Kotsopoulou, A. & Francis, K. (2014). Grammatical abilities of Greek-speaking children with autism. Language Acquisition, 21, 4–44.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomblin, J. B., Records, N. L., Buckwalter, P., Zhang, X., Smith, E., & O’Brien, M. (1997). Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 1245–1260.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L., Delage, H., Monjauze, C., Piller, A. G. & Barthez. M. A. (2011). Clitic pronoun production as a measure of atypical language development in French. Lingua, 121, 423–441.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, L., Ferré, S., Prévost, P., Barthez, M. A., Malvy, J., & Bonnet-Brilhault, F. (2017). The effect of computational complexity on the acquisition of French by children with ASD (Unpublished manuscript). University of Tours.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltzman, D. E., & Cairns, H. S. (2000). Grammatical knowledge of third grade good and poor readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 263-284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zachou, A. (2013). Language production and syntactic awareness in developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Evidence from Italian and Greek (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Milan-Bicocca.Google Scholar
Zebib R., Tuller, L., Prévost, P., & Morin, E. (2013). Formal language impairment in French-speaking children with ASD: A comparative ASD/SLI study. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstantinopoulou (Eds.), Advances in Language Acquisition (pp.472–484). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar