References

References

Anagnostopoulou, E.
(1997) Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In E. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, & F. Zwarts (Eds.) Materials on left dislocation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 14) (pp.151–192). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ausín, A., & Depiante, M.
(2000) On the syntax of parecer (to seem) with and without an experiencer. In H. Campos, E. Herburger, A. Morales-Front, & T. J. Walsh (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the turn of the millennium: Papers from the 3rd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp.155–170). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ausín, A.
(2001) On A-movement. Storrs, CT. UConn dissertation. Google Scholar
Baker, M. C.
(1997) Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp.73–137). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., Johnson, K., & Roberts, I.
(1989) Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 219–251.Google Scholar
Becker, M.
(2006) There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry, 37. 441–456.Google Scholar
Bosque, I., & Torrego, E.
(1995) On Spanish haber and tense. Langues et Grammaire, 1, 13–29.Google Scholar
Choe, J.
(2012) Children seem to know raising: Raising and intervention in child language (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Hawai'i at Manoa.Google Scholar
Choe, J., & Deen, K.
(2016) Children’s difficulty with raising: A performance account. Language Acquisition, 23(2), 112–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(2004) Restructuring and functional structure. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, 3 (pp.132–191). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, R., & Roberts, I.
(1993) A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 299–345.Google Scholar
Collins, C.
(2005a) A smuggling approach to raising in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 289–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005b) A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8(2), 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C., & Thráinsson, H.
(1996) VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(3), 391–444.Google Scholar
Crain, S., & McKee, C.
(1985) The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. In Proceedings of NELS 15 (pp.94–110). Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B., & Grillo, N.
(2008) How to become passive. In K. Grohmann (Ed.) Explorations of phase theory: Features, arguments, and interpretation at the interfaces (pp.231–268). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L.
(2006) Clitic climbing and the dual status of sembrare. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(3), 484–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, C. K.
(2011) The acquisition of raising (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., Orfitelli, R., & Wexler, K.
(2007) When seem means think: The role of the experiencer-phrase in children’s comprehension of raising. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America (GALANA) (pp.135–146). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Hyams, N., & Snyder, W.
(2005) Young children never smuggle: Reflexive clitics and the universal freezing hypothesis. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Jakubowicz, C.
(2004) Is movement costly? The grammar and the processor in language acquisition. Paper presented at Journée d’Etudes Linguistiques. University of Nantes, France.Google Scholar
(2011) Measuring derivational complexity: New evidence from typically developing and SLI learners of L1 French. Lingua, 121(3), 339–351. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landau, I.
(2010) The explicit syntax of implicit arguments. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(3), 357–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leborans, M. J. F.
(1999) La predicación: Las oraciones copulativas. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp.2357–2460). Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Mateu, V. E.
(2016) Intervention effects in the acquisition of raising and control: Evidence from English and Spanish(Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
(2000) The CHILDES project: The database (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Orfitelli, R. M.
(2012) Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Roussou, A.
(2003) Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodriquez, M., Sugisaki, K., & Snyder, W.
(2005) Clitic climbing in child Spanish and the theory of parameters. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29 online proceedings supplement. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, W., & Hyams, N.
(2015) Minimality effect in children’s passives. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honor of Adriana Belletti (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223) (pp.343–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, D.
(1996) Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (Eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp.213–276). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E.
(1996) Experiencers and raising verbs. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Current issues in comparative grammar (pp.101–120). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2002) Arguments for a derivational approach to syntactic relations based on clitics. In S. Epstein & D. Seely (Eds.), Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program (pp.249–268). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, S., Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R.
(2001) Verb movement in acquisition and aphasia: Same problem, different solutions–Evidence from Dutch. Brain and Language, 77(3), 449–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar