Argument omission in SignL2 acquisition by deaf learners
Back to the inhibition
We examine subject omission in American Sign Language (ASL) as a second sign language (SignL2) by deaf and hard-of-hearing users of Emirati Sign Language (EmiratiSL) with variable ages of exposure to SignL1. Results indicate that during a narrative, similarly to unimodal speech bilinguals, SignL2 learners of low ASL proficiency oversupply overt subject arguments – both NPs and pronouns (IX). In this, SignL2 learners behave differently from other ASL bilinguals described in the literature. We interpret the findings as offering support to the line of research arguing that certain atypicalities in multilingual production are best explained as resulting from the interaction between linguistic and general cognitive control mechanisms – i.e. that bilinguals oversupply arguments due to processing reasons. This phenomenon is modality independent.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Detour: Modality issues
- 3.Study goals and predictions
- 4.Methodology
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Tasks
- 4.3Transcription and coding
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Limitations and directions
-
Acknowledgment
-
Notes
-
References
References (72)
Asudeh, A.
(
2004)
Resumption as resource management (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Stanford University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bahan, B., Kegl, J., Lee, R., MacLaughlin, D., & Neidle, C.
(
2000)
The licensing of null arguments in ASL.
Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), 1–27.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bank, R., Crasborn, O., & Van Hout, R.
(
2018)
Bimodal code-mixing: Dutch spoken language elements in NGT discourse.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 104–120.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bell, A., Ortells, M., & Morgan, G.
(
2015)
Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners.
International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(5), 608–624.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A.
(
2007)
Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blais, M. J., Oshima-Takane, Y., Genesee, F., & Hirakawa, M.
(
2010)
Crosslinguistic influence on argument realization in Japanese-French bilinguals. In
K. Franich,
K. M. Iserman, &
L. L. Keil (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.34–45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M.
(
2011)
When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language.
Language Learning, 61(4), 1302–1327.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I.
(
2006)
Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure.
Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 608–635.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carrigan, E., & Coppola, M.
(
2012)
Mothers do not drive structure in adult homesign systems: Evidence from comprehension. In
N. Miyake,
D. Peebles, &
R. P. Cooper (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 34th annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1398–1403). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Carroll, K. S., Al Kahwaji, B., & Litz, D.
(
2017)
Triglossia and promoting Arabic literacy in the United Arab Emirates.
Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30(3), 317–332.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chamorro, G., Sorace, A., & Sturt, P.
(
2015)
What is the source of L1 attrition? The effects of recent re-exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 520–532.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen Pichler, D., Hochgesang, J., Lillo-Martin, D., & Müller de Quadros, R.
Chen Pichler, D., & Koulidobrova, E.
(
2015)
Acquisition of sign language as a second language (L2). In
M. Marchark, &
P. Spencer (Eds.),
The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies, language, and education (pp.118–230). Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen Pichler, D.
(
2011)
Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In
G. Mathur, &
D. J. Napoli (Eds.),
Deaf around the world: The impact of language (pp.96–121). Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dostal, H., & Wolbers, K.
(
2016)
Examining student writing proficiencies across genres: Results of an intervention study.
Deafness & Education International, 18(3), 159–169.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T. H.
(
2008a)
Bimodal bilingualism.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 43–61.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J. E., & Bialystok, E.
(
2008b)
The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals.
Psychological Science, 19(12), 1201–1206.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frederiksen, A. T., & Mayberry, R. I.
(
2015)
Tracking reference in space: How La2 learners use ASL referring expressions. In
E. Grillo &
K. Jepson (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development (pp.165–177). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Futrell, R., Hickey, T., Lee, A., Lim, E., Luchkina, E., & Gibson, E.
(
2015)
Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: A subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages.
Cognition, 126, 215–221.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hacohen, A., & Schaeffer, J.
(
2007)
Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3), 333–344.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, P. C., Paludneviciene, R., Kurz, K. B., Emmorey, K., & Contreras, J.
(
2016.)
American Sign Language Comprehension Test: A tool for sign language researchers.
Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(1), 64–69.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haznedar, B.
(
2010)
Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish.
Second Language Research 26(3), 355–378.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hendriks, B.
(
2008)
Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (PhD dissertation). Utrecht:
LOT Dissertations in Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, P.-Y
(
1999)
The development of null arguments in a Cantonese-English bilingual child (Unpublished MA thesis). Chinese University of Hong Kong.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(
2000)
Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, J., Watkins, R., & Rice, M. L.
(
1992)
Bimodal bilingual language development in a hearing child of deaf parents.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(1), 31–52.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juan-Garau, M., & Perez-Vidal, C.
(
2000)
Subject realization in the syntactic development of a bilingual child.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 173–191.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karchmer M., & Mitchell, R.
(
2003)
Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In
M. Marchark &
P. Spencer (Eds.),
Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp.21–37). Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E.
(
2012)
When the quiet surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of argument omission in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Connecticut.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E.
(
2013a)
Influence uninhibited: Null subjects in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. In
S. Stavrakaki,
M. Lalioti, &
P. Konstantinopolou (Eds.),
Advances in language acquisition (pp.346–355). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E.
(
2013b)
She said __ was ok: Embedded subject omission in the English of ASL-English bilinguals. Paper presented at the
LSA 2013 (Winter). Boston, MA,
January 2013.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E.
(
2014)
Null arguments in bimodal bilingualism: Code-blending (and the lack of) effects in American Sign Language. In
W. Orman &
M. J. Valleau (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.253–265), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E.
(
2017b)
Elide me bare: Null arguments in ASL.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35, 397–446.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(
2016)
Point of inquiry: The case of the (non) pronominal IX in ASL. In
P. Grodsz &
P. Patel (Eds.),
Impact of pronominal form on interpretation (pp.221–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koulidobrova, E., & Palmer, J.
(
2016)
Phonological discrimination in Sign L2: Within, vs. across, modality effects. Theoretical Issues in Sign Linguistics (TISLR), 12, Melbourne,
January 2016.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka. Z.
(
2006)
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillo-Martin, D.
(
1991)
Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillo-Martin, D.
(
1995)
The Point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In
K. Emmorey &
J. Reilly (Eds.),
Language, gesture, and space (pp.155–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R., Koulidobrova, E., & Chen Pichler, D.
(
2009)
Bimodal bilingual cross-language influence in unexpected domains. In
J. Costa,
A. Castro,
M. Lobo, &
F. Pratas (Eds.),
Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009 (pp.269–275). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayberry, R. I.
(
2007)
When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 537–549.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mayberry R. I., & Lock E.
(
2003)
Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis.
Brain and Language, 87(3), 369–384.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meier, R.
(
1990)
Person deixis in American Sign Language. In
S. Fischer, &
P. Siple (Eds.),
Theoretical issues in sign language research, 1: Linguistics (pp.175–190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mishina-Mori, S.
(
2007)
Argument representation in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Is there a crosslingusitic influence? In
H. Count-Nulton,
S. Kulatiklake, &
I.-H. Woo (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.441–450). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, J., & Slorach, N.
(
1983)
The language development of pre-preschool hearing children of deaf parents.
British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 18(2), 118–126.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ortega-Delgado, G.
(
2013)
Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: The role of sign structure and iconicity (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University College London.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petroj, V., Guerrera, K., & Davidson, K.
(
2014)
ASL-dominant code-blending in the whispering of bimodal bilingual children. In
W. Orman &
M. J. Valleau (Eds.),
Proceedings of 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.319–330). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reynolds, W.
(
2016)
Early bimodal bilingual development of ASL narrative referent cohesion: Using a heritage language framework. PhD dissertation, Gallaudet University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sachs, J., Bard, B., & Johnson, M.
(
1981)
Language learning with restricted input: Case studies of two hearing children of deaf parents.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 2(1), 33–54.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(
2006)
Sign Languages and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiff, N., & Ventry, I.
(
1976)
Communication problems in hearing children of deaf parents.
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 348–358.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schiff-Myers, N.
(
1988)
Hearing children of deaf parents. In
D. Bishop, &
K. Mogford (Eds.),
Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances (pp.47–61). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmitz, K., Patuto, M., & Müller, N.
(
2012)
The null-subject parameter at the interface between syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from bilingual German-Italian, German-French and Italian-French children.
First Language, 32(1–2), 205–238.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Seal, B., & Hammett, L.
(
1995)
Language intervention with a hearing child whose parents are deaf.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 15–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M.
(
2011)
Pronominal objects in English-Italian and Spanish-Italian bilingual children.
Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 1–27.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(
2004)
Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition.
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3),183–205.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A.
(
2003)
Near-nativeness. In
M. Long &
C. Doughty (Eds.),
Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.130–152). Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A.
(
2006a)
Possible manifestations of shallow processing in advanced second language speakers.
Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 88–91.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A.
(
2006b)
Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In
G. Fanselow,
C. Fery,
M. Schlesewsky, &
R. Vogel (Eds.),
Gradience in grammars: Generative perspectives. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(
2006)
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian.
Second Language Research, 22, 339–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L. Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M.
(
2009)
Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children.
Lingua, 119, 460–477.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Todd, P.
(
1971)
A case of structural interference across sensory modalities in second-language learning.
Word, 27(1–3), 102–118.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsimpli, I., & Sorace, A.
(
2006)
Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In
D. Bamman,
T. Magnitskaia, &
C. Zaller (Eds.),
Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsimpli, I., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F.
(
2004)
First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English.
International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wulf, A., Dudis, P., Bayley, R., & Lucas, C.
(
2002)
Variable subject presence in ASL narratives.
Sign Language Studies, 3(1), 54–76.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwanziger, E. E., Allen, S. E. M., & Genesee, F.
(
2005)
Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: Subject omission in learners of Inuktitut and English.
Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 893–909.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Pichler, Deborah Chen & Elena Koulidobrova
2023.
The Role of Modality in L2 Learning: The Importance of Learners Acquiring a Second Sign Language (M2L2 and M1L2 Learners).
Language Learning 73:S1
► pp. 197 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Schönström, Krister & Ingela Holmström
2022.
L2M1 and L2M2 Acquisition of Sign Lexicon: The Impact of Multimodality on the Sign Second Language Acquisition.
Frontiers in Psychology 13
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.