Chapter published in:
Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 297–318

Argument omission in SignL2 acquisition by deaf learners

Back to the inhibition

| Central Connecticut State University
We examine subject omission in American Sign Language (ASL) as a second sign language (SignL2) by deaf and hard-of-hearing users of Emirati Sign Language (EmiratiSL) with variable ages of exposure to SignL1. Results indicate that during a narrative, similarly to unimodal speech bilinguals, SignL2 learners of low ASL proficiency oversupply overt subject arguments – both NPs and pronouns (IX). In this, SignL2 learners behave differently from other ASL bilinguals described in the literature. We interpret the findings as offering support to the line of research arguing that certain atypicalities in multilingual production are best explained as resulting from the interaction between linguistic and general cognitive control mechanisms – i.e. that bilinguals oversupply arguments due to processing reasons. This phenomenon is modality independent.
Keywords: null subject, sign language, deaf, narrative
Published online: 15 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.15kou
References

References

Asudeh, A.
(2004) Resumption as resource management (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Stanford University.Google Scholar
Bahan, B., Kegl, J., Lee, R., MacLaughlin, D., & Neidle, C.
(2000) The licensing of null arguments in ASL. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bank, R., Crasborn, O., & Van Hout, R.
(2018) Bimodal code-mixing: Dutch spoken language elements in NGT discourse. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(1), 104–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., Ortells, M., & Morgan, G.
(2015) Reference control in the narratives of adult sign language learners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(5), 608–624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A.
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689.Google Scholar
Blais, M. J., Oshima-Takane, Y., Genesee, F., & Hirakawa, M.
(2010) Crosslinguistic influence on argument realization in Japanese-French bilinguals. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, & L. L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.34–45). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bochner, J. H., Christie, K., Hauser, P. C., & Searls, J. M.
(2011) When is a difference really different? Learners’ discrimination of linguistic contrasts in American Sign Language. Language Learning, 61(4), 1302–1327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boudreault, P., & Mayberry, R. I.
(2006) Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 608–635. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carrigan, E., & Coppola, M.
(2012) Mothers do not drive structure in adult homesign systems: Evidence from comprehension. In N. Miyake, D. Peebles, & R. P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.1398–1403). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Carroll, K. S., Al Kahwaji, B., & Litz, D.
(2017) Triglossia and promoting Arabic literacy in the United Arab Emirates. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30(3), 317–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chamorro, G., Sorace, A., & Sturt, P.
(2015) What is the source of L1 attrition? The effects of recent re-exposure on Spanish speakers under L1 attrition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(3), 520–532. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., Hochgesang, J., Lillo-Martin, D., & Müller de Quadros, R.
(2010) Conventions for sign and speech transcription in child bimodal bilingual corpora. Language, Interaction and Acquisition/Language, Interaction et Acquisition, 1(1), 11–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, D., & Koulidobrova, E.
(2015) Acquisition of sign language as a second language (L2). In M. Marchark, & P. Spencer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Deaf studies, language, and education (pp.118–230). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chen Pichler, D.
(2011) Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In G. Mathur, & D. J. Napoli (Eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language (pp.96–121). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dostal, H., & Wolbers, K.
(2016) Examining student writing proficiencies across genres: Results of an intervention study. Deafness & Education International, 18(3), 159–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K., Borinstein, H. B., Thompson, R., & Gollan, T. H.
(2008a) Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(1), 43–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J. E., & Bialystok, E.
(2008b) The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1201–1206. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frederiksen, A. T., & Mayberry, R. I.
(2015) Tracking reference in space: How La2 learners use ASL referring expressions. In E. Grillo & K. Jepson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 39th annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development (pp.165–177). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Futrell, R., Hickey, T., Lee, A., Lim, E., Luchkina, E., & Gibson, E.
(2015) Cross-linguistic gestures reflect typological universals: A subject-initial, verb-final bias in speakers of diverse languages. Cognition, 126, 215–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hacohen, A., & Schaeffer, J.
(2007) Subject realization in early Hebrew/English bilingual acquisition: The role of crosslinguistic influence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 10(3), 333–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, P. C., Paludneviciene, R., Kurz, K. B., Emmorey, K., & Contreras, J.
(2016.) American Sign Language Comprehension Test: A tool for sign language researchers. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(1), 64–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haznedar, B.
(2010) Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Pronominal subjects in bilingual Turkish. Second Language Research 26(3), 355–378. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, B.
(2008) Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (PhD dissertation). Utrecht: LOT Dissertations in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Huang, P -Y.
(1999) The development of null arguments in a Cantonese-English bilingual child (Unpublished MA thesis). Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hulk, A., & Müller, N.
(2000) Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Watkins, R., & Rice, M.
(1992) Bimodal bilingual language development in a hearing child of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13(1), 31–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juan-Garau, M., & Perez-Vidal, C.
(2000) Subject realization in the syntactic development of a bilingual child. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(3), 173–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karchmer M., & Mitchell, R.
(2003) Demographic and achievement characteristics of deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In M. Marchark & P. Spencer (Eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (pp.21–37). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E.
(2012) When the quiet surfaces: ‘Transfer’ of argument omission in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
(2013a) Influence uninhibited: Null subjects in the speech of ASL-English bilinguals. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstantinopolou (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition (pp.346–355). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
(2013b) She said __ was ok: Embedded subject omission in the English of ASL-English bilinguals. Paper presented at the LSA 2013 (Winter). Boston, MA, January 2013.Google Scholar
(2014) Null arguments in bimodal bilingualism: Code-blending (and the lack of) effects in American Sign Language. In W. Orman & M. J. Valleau (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.253–265), Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2017a) Argument omission in ASL-English bilinguals: Language interaction effects in bimodal bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 7(5), 583–613. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Elide me bare: Null arguments in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35, 397–446. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koulidobrova, E., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(2016) Point of inquiry: The case of the (non) pronominal IX in ASL. In P. Grodsz & P. Patel (Eds.), Impact of pronominal form on interpretation (pp.221–250). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koulidobrova, E., & Palmer, J.
(2016) Phonological discrimination in Sign L2: Within, vs. across, modality effects. Theoretical Issues in Sign Linguistics (TISLR), 12, Melbourne, January 2016.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., Bobb, S. C., & Wodniecka. Z.
(2006) Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 119–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D.
(1991) Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The Point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (Eds.), Language, gesture, and space (pp.155–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, D., Quadros, R., Koulidobrova, E., & Chen Pichler, D.
(2009) Bimodal bilingual cross-language influence in unexpected domains. In J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobos, & E. Pratas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009 (pp.269–275). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Mayberry, R. I.
(2007) When timing is everything: Age of first-language acquisition effects on second-language learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(3), 537–549. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayberry R. I., & Lock E.
(2003) Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: Evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis. Brain and Language, 87(3), 369–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meier, R.
(1990) Person deixis in American Sign Language. In S. Fischer, & P. Siple (Eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research, 1: Linguistics (pp.175–190). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mishina-Mori, S.
(2007) Argument representation in Japanese/English simultaneous bilinguals: Is there a crosslingusitic influence? In H. Count-Nulton, S. Kulatiklake, & I -H Woo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.441–450). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, J., & Slorach, N.
(1983) The language development of pre-preschool hearing children of deaf parents. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 18(2), 118–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., & Morgan, G.
(2010) Comparing child and adult development of a visual phonological system. Language , Interaction and Acquisition, 1, 67–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega-Delgado, G.
(2013) Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: The role of sign structure and iconicity (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University College London.Google Scholar
Petroj, V., Guerrera, K., & Davidson, K.
(2014) ASL-dominant code-blending in the whispering of bimodal bilingual children. In W. Orman & M. J. Valleau (Eds.), Proceedings of 38th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.319–330). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Pinto, M.
(2006) Subject acquisition in bilinguals: Interference or maturation. In L. Escobar & V. Torrens (Eds.), The acquisition of syntax in Romance Languages (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 41) (pp.331–352). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, W.
(2016) Early bimodal bilingual development of ASL narrative referent cohesion: Using a heritage language framework. PhD dissertation, Gallaudet University.Google Scholar
Sachs, J., Bard, B., & Johnson, M.
(1981) Language learning with restricted input: Case studies of two hearing children of deaf parents. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2(1), 33–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W., & Lillo-Martin, D.
(2006) Sign Languages and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, N., & Ventry, I.
(1976) Communication problems in hearing children of deaf parents. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41(3), 348–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiff-Myers, N.
(1988) Hearing children of deaf parents. In D. Bishop, & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language Development in Exceptional Circumstances (pp.47–61). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Schmitz, K., Patuto, M., & Muller, N.
(2012) The null-subject parameter at the interface between syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from bilingual German-Italian, German-French and Italian-French children. First Language, 32(1–2), 205–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seal, B., & Hammett, L.
(1995) Language intervention with a hearing child whose parents are deaf. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 15–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F. & Baldo, M.
(2011) Pronominal objects in English-Italian and Spanish-Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(4), 1–27.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English-Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(3),183–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2003) Near-nativeness. In M. Long & C. Doughty (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp.130–152). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Selective optionality in language development. In L. Cornips & K. P. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation. Reconciling the biological and the social (pp.55–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006a) Possible manifestations of shallow processing in advanced second language speakers. Applied Psycholinguistics 27, 88–91.Google Scholar
(2006b) Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars. In G. Fanselow, C. Fery, M. Schlesewsky, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Gradience in grammars: Generative perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Referring expressions and executive functions in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 669–684. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., Serratrice, L. Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M.
(2009) Discourse conditions on subject pronoun realization: Testing the linguistic intuitions of older bilingual children. Lingua, 119, 460–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Todd, P.
(1971) A case of structural interference across sensory modalities in second-language learning. Word, 27(1–3), 102–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I.
(2011) External interfaces and the notion of ‘default.’ Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1(1), 101–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Sorace, A.
(2006) Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, T., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. & Filiaci, F.
(2004) First language attrition and syntactic subjects: a study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wulf, A., Dudis, P., Bayley, R., & Lucas, C.
(2002) Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies, 3(1), 54–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwanziger, E. E., Allen, S. E. M., & Genesee, F.
(2005) Cross-linguistic influence in bilingual acquisition: Subject omission in learners of Inuktitut and English. Journal of Child Language, 32(4), 893–909. CrossrefGoogle Scholar