Cover not available
Part of
Three Streams of Generative Language Acquisition Research: Selected papers from the 7th Meeting of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition – North America, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Edited by Tania Ionin and Matthew Rispoli
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 63] 2019
► pp. 319–346

The Bottleneck Hypothesis updated

| University of Southampton | NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology
The Bottleneck Hypothesis identifies parts of the grammar that are easier or more difficult to acquire in a second language. It argues that the functional morphology is the bottleneck in L2 acquisition because it bundles a variety of semantic, syntactic and phonological features that affect the meaning and acceptability of the whole sentence. In this chapter, the BH is updated after a decade since its proposal. Current views of Universal Grammar and parametric variation are outlined. Implications of those current views for adult L2A are spelled out. New evidence for the BH is reviewed from the L2A of semantics, morphophonology and syntax. Additional factors that complicate acquisition of the functional morphology are discussed and a pyramid of L2A difficulty is proposed.
Keywords: second language acquisition, Bottleneck Hypothesis, functional morphology, syntax, semantics, syntax-discourse interface, features, parameters, lexicon, hierarchy of acquisition difficulty
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Current views of UG and parametric variation
  • 3.Adult L2A: Assumptions and predictions
  • 4.Evidence from the acquisition of syntax
  • 5.Evidence from acquisition of semantics
  • 6.Complicating factors
    • 6.1Morphosyntax-semantics mismatches
    • 6.2Feature reassembly
    • 6.3Functional redundancy
    • 6.4Opacity
    • 6.5Construction frequency
  • 7.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.63.16sla
References
Baker, M.
(1996) The Polysynthesis Parameter. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
(2001) The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar. London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2008) The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132) (pp.351–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N.
(2011) The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development. In A.-M. Di Sciullo, & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise (pp.19–41). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T.
(2011) In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies. Paper presented at the Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation: Rethinking Parameters (Madrid).Google Scholar
(2015) The limits of syntactic variation: An emergentist generative perspective. Paper presented at the Workshop on Linguistic Variation and Change and Cultural Evolution, University of York.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T., & Roberts, I.
(2015) Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. In J. Chancharu, X. Hu, & M. Mitrović (Eds.), Cambridge occasional papers in linguistics (Vol. 7, pp.1–31. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Birner, B. J., & Ward, G.
(1994) Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. In S. Gahl, A. Dolbey, & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of the twentieth annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp.93–102). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C.
(2011) Approaching parameters from below. In A.-M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (Eds.), Biolinguistic approaches to language evolution and variation (pp.205–221). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, H.
(1984) Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Structuring sense (Vols. I & II). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Structuring sense (Vol. III). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brunetti, L., Bott, S., Costa, J., & Vallduví, E.
(2011) A multilingual annotated corpus for the study of information structure. Paper presented at the Grammar and Corpora 2009 Conference.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J., & Roberts, I.
(2017) Principles and Parameters of Universal Grammar. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar (pp.307–354). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot (Eds.), Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (pp.32–75). London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2001) Beyond explanatory adequacy (MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
(2005) Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
(1999) Adverbs and functional heads: A crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1986) Verbal inflection in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics, 24, 79–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conradie, S.
(2006) Investigating the acquisition of the Split-IP parameter and the V2 parameter in second language Afrikaans. Second Language Research, 22, 64–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuza, A., Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Pires, A. and Rothman, J.
(2013) The syntax-semantics of bare and definite plural subjects in the L2 Spanish of English natives. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17 (5). pp.634–652. ISSN 1756-6878 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.
(2005) What makes learning second-language grammar difficult? A review of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B.
(2011) Left-dislocation in near-native French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 399–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N., & Collins, L.
(2009) Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function. Introduction to the Special issue of The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 329–335.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G.
(1996) Second language acquisition: Theoretical & experimental is-sues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 677–758. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukui, N.
(1988) Deriving the differences between English and Japanese: A case study in parametric syntax. English Linguistics, 5, 249–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavruseva, E., & Lardiere, D.
(1996) The emergence of extended phrase structure in child L2 acquisition. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.225–236). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gianollo, C., Guardiano, C., & Longobardi, G.
(2008) Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132) (pp.109–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, M. L., & Michaelis, L. A.
(2001) Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1665–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P., Pires, A., & Nedeger, W.
(2017) Delay in the acquisition of Differential Object Marking by Spanish monolingual and bilingual teenagers, International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(2), 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1993) Distributed morphology & the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp.111–176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H., & Ritter, E.
(2002) A feature-geometric analysis of person and number. Language, 78(3), 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopp, H.
(2007) Ultimate attainment at the interfaces in second language acquisition: Grammar and processing. Groningen: Grodil Press.Google Scholar
Hwang, S. H., & Lardiere, D.
(2013) Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach. Second Language Research, 29(1), 57–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S.
(2010) The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning, 60(4), 877–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K.
(2004) Article semantics in L2-acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12, 3–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., Montrul, S., & Crivos, M.
(2013) A bidirectional study on the acquisition of plural noun phrase interpretation in English and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 483–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, I. P.
(July 2012) L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic doubling: A test Case for the Interface Hypothesis. Second Language Research Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.345–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jensen, I., Slabakova, R., & Westergaard, M.
(2017) The Bottleneck Hypothesis in L2 acquisition: A study of L1 Norwegian speakers’ knowledge of syntax & morphology in L2 English. In M. LaMendola, & J. Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.
(2005) Remarks on Comparative Syntax, with special reference to English & French. In G. Cinque, & R. Kayne (Eds.), Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp.3–69). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lardiere, D.
(1998a) Case and tense in a ‘fossilized’ steady state. Second Language Research, 14(1), 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b) Disassociating syntax from morphology in a divergent L2 end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14(4), 359–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, & A. Liljestrand (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp.178–192). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2009) Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leal, T., Rothman, J., & Slabakova. R.
(2014) A rare structure at the syntax-discourse interface: Heritage & Spanish-dominant native speakers weigh in. Language Acquisition, 21(4), 411–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, M -C.
(2012) The acquisition of tense & agreement by early child second language learners (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M.
(2009) Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of Differential Object Marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 12(3), 363–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Slabakova, R.
(2002) Acquiring morphosyntactic & semantic properties of Preterit and Imperfect tenses in L2 Spanish. In A.-T. Pérez-Leroux & J. Liceras (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax: The L1-L2 connection (pp.113–149). Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Competence similarities between native and near-native speakers: An investigation of the Preterit/Imperfect contrast in Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 351–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J.
(2017) Where, if anywhere, are parameters? A critical historical overview of parametric theory. In C. Bowern, L. Horn, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), On looking into words (and beyond) (pp.547–569). Berlin: Language Science Press. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost P.
(1999) The second language acquisition of the split CP structure. In E. C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: A generative approach (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 18) (pp.45–79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, G. C., & Svenonius, P.
(2008) Mapping a parochial lexicon onto a universal semantics. In T. Biberauer (Ed.), The limits of syntactic variation (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132) (pp.219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp.281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I.
(2012) Macroparameters & Minimalism: A programme for comparative research. In C. Galves, S. Cyrino, R. Lopes, F. Sândalo, & J. Avelar (Eds.), Parameter theory and linguistic change (pp.320–335). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) Introduction. In I. Roberts (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar (pp.1–35). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Holmberg, A.
(2010) Introduction: Parameters in Minimalist theory. In T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg, I. Roberts, & M. Sheehan (Eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in Minimalist theory (pp.1–57). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., & Slabakova, R.
(2017) The state of the science in generative SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, articles in press. doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A.
(2013) Generative approaches and the Poverty of the Stimulus. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp.137–158). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994) Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8) (pp.317–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access Hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, F.
(2009) Two types of definites in natural language (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., Filiaci, F., & Baldo, M.
(2009) Bilingual children’s sensitivity to specificity & genericity: Evidence from metalinguistic awareness. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition, 12, 239–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Montrul, S.
(2002) On viewpoint aspect and its L2 acquisition: A UG perspective. In R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Tense-aspect morphology in L2 acquisition (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 27) (pp.363–398). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Genericity and aspect in L2 acquisition. Language Acquisition, 11, 165–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J.
(2012) Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax-discourse Interface. Second Language Research, 28(3), 319–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2003) Semantic evidence for functional categories in interlanguage grammars. Second Language Research, 19, 42–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) Is there a critical period for the acquisition of semantics? Second Language Research, 22(3), 302–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Meaning in the second language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) What is easy and what is hard to acquire in a second language? In M. Bowles, T. Ionin, S. Montrul, & A. Tremblay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 10) (pp.280–294). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2015a) Acquiring temporal meanings without tense morphology: The case of L2 Mandarin Chinese. Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015b) The effect of construction frequency and native transfer on L2 knowledge of the syntax-discourse interface. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(3), 671–699. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2011) Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starke, M.
(2009) Nanosyntax. A short primer to a new approach to syntax (Unpublished manuscript). Tromsø 25 April 2013 <[URL] Google Scholar
Su, J.
(2016) Feature reassembly in the L2 acquisition of Chinese. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, May 30, Calgary.Google Scholar
Tran, J.
(2005a) Verb position and verb form in English-speaking children’s L2 acquisition of German. In A. Brugos, M. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp.592–603). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2005b) Word order & verb inflection in English-speaking children’s L2 acquisition of German V2. University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in Linguistics, 36, 1–33.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.
(2014) Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(3), 283–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M.
(1994) Direct access to X-bar theory: Evidence from Korean & Turkish adults learning German. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar (Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8) (pp.265–316). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996) Gradual development of L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research, 12(1), 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wahlstrom McKay, L.
(2001) The acquisition and use of verb-second structures by second language learners of German (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Iowa.Google Scholar
White, L.
(2003) Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.
(2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
(2004) Universal Grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(10), 451–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G.
(1935) The psychobiology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Antonicelli, Giada & Stefano Rastelli
2023. Event-related potentials in the study of L2 sentence processing: A scoping review of the decade 2010-2020. Language Acquisition 30:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
AZAZ, MAHMOUD
2019. L1 Transfer Effects in the Production of Generic Plurals in L2 Arabic. The Modern Language Journal 103:1 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
García-Tejada, Aída, Alejandro Cuza & Eduardo Gerardo Lustres Alonso
2023. The production and comprehension of Spanish se use in L2 and heritage Spanish. Second Language Research 39:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Jessen, Anna, Lara Schwarz & Claudia Felser
2021. Gradience in subject–verb number agreement: Can bilinguals tune in?. Applied Psycholinguistics 42:6 ► pp. 1523 ff. DOI logo
KULSHA, Dzmitry & Filiz CELE
2023. Acquisition Of Adjective Morphology and Agreement In Split Contexts By Adult L1 Turkish / L2 Russian Speakers. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 34:1 ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Li, Ying & Heather Goad
2022. Naïve English-speaking learners’ use of indirect positive evidence. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism DOI logo
Wu, Shiyu, Dilin Liu & Zan Li
2023. Testing the Bottleneck Hypothesis: Chinese EFL learners’ knowledge of morphology and syntax across proficiency levels. Second Language Research 39:4 ► pp. 1191 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.