Chapter published in:
L1 Acquisition and L2 Learning: The view from Romance
Edited by Larisa Avram, Anca Sevcenco and Veronica Tomescu
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 65] 2021
► pp. 260288
References

References

Aboh, E. O., Hartmann, K., & Zimmermann, M.
(Eds.) (2007) Focus strategies in African languages. The interaction of Focus and grammar in Niger-Congo and Afro-Asiatic. Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Antinucci, F., & Cinque, G.
(1977) Sull’ordine delle parole in italiano: L’emarginazione. Studi di Grammatica Italiana, 6, 121–146.Google Scholar
Beaver, D., & Clark, B.
(2008) Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A.
(1988) The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 1–34.Google Scholar
(2007) Answering strategies. A view from acquisition. In S. Baauw, F. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory (pp. 19–38). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Answering strategies: New information subjects and the nature of clefts. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and strategies (pp. 242–265). Routledge.Google Scholar
Belletti, A., & Bianchi, V.
(2016) Definiteness effect and unaccusative subjects: An overview and some new thoughts. In S. Fischer, T. Kupisch, & E. Rinke (Eds.), Definiteness effects: Bilingual, typological and diachronic variation (pp. 14–65). Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Bianchi, V., & Bocci, G.
(2012) Should I stay or should I go? Optional Focus movement in Italian. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 9 (pp. 1–16). Retrieved from http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr.​/eiss9
Bianchi, V., & Frascarelli, M.
(2010) Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia, 2, 43–88.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I., & Sheehan, M.
(Eds.) (2010) Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Büring, D.
(2003) On D-trees, beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 511–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, L.
(1986) Italian syntax. A government-binding approach. Reidel.Google Scholar
Cinque, G., & Rizzi, L.
(2010) The cartography of syntactic structures. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 65–78). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Corpina, B.
(2018) Comprensione e interpretazione del soggetto nullo all’interfaccia tra sintassi e prosodia. Uno studio evolutivo e longitudinale (3–9 anni) (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Roma Tre.
Emonds, J.
(1976) A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure- preserving and local transformations. Academic Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In D. Adger, C. de Cat, & G. Tsoulas (Eds.), Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects (pp. 75–120). Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M.
(2000) The syntax-phonology interface in focus and topic constructions in Italian. Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro. An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 691–734. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The interpretation of pro in consistent and partial NS languages: A comparative interface analysis. In F. Cognola & J. Casalicchio (Eds.), Null-subjects in generative grammar. A synchronic and diachronic perspective (pp. 211–239). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, M., & Carella, G.
(2019) Topic chains and the interpretation of null subjects: The acquisition of discourse-related strategies in Italian. The Linguistic Review, 36(4), 637–674. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M., & Hinterhölzl, R.
(2007) Types of topics in German and Italian. In S. Winkler & K. Schwabe (Eds.), On information structure, meaning and form (pp. 87–116). John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, M., & Stortini, T.
(2019) Focus constructions, verb types and the SV/VS order in Italian: An acquisitional study from a syntax-prosody perspective. Lingua, 227, 102690 (online). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, I.
(1982) The semantics of definiteness and indefiniteness (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Massachusetts.
Heycock, C.
(2006) Embedded root phenomena. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (pp. 174–209). Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R.
(1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, M.
(2001) Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Basic notions of information structure. In C. Féry, G. Fanselow, & M. Krifka (Eds.), The notions of information structure. Special issue of Interdisciplinary studies on information structure, 6, 13–55.Google Scholar
Kuroda, S.-Y.
(1965) Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
(1972) The categorical and the thetic judgment: Evidence from Japanese syntax. Foundations of Language, 9, 153–185.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form. Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Leusen, N.
(2004) Incompatibility in context: A diagnosis of correction. Journal of Semantics, 21, 415–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miyagawa, S., & Saito, M.
(Eds.) (2008) Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I.
(1986) Prosodic phonology. Foris.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T.
(1982) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27, 53–94.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
(1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C.
(2003) Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26, 287–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rooth, M.
(1992) A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1, 75–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasse, H.-J.
(1987) The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics, 25, 511–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar