Cover not available
Part of
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 53–84

Chapter 3
Derivational patterns in spontaneous data of French-speaking parent-child interactions before age three

| University of Lausanne
| University of Lausanne

This chapter is a first step towards the characterisation of the morphological structure of the French lexicon in early first language acquisition, i.e. before children coin novel word formations. Focusing on nouns and verbs, it analyses the variety of derivational means used by toddlers and caregivers in two corpora of French-speaking children (1;4/1;6–2;11). A comparison is done with a sample of adult-directed (ADS) speech. Findings on derivation are compared with previous observations on compounds in the same data. The results display the development of tight-knit morphological relationships within the lexicon and a clear prevalence of suffixation over other derivational means and compounding. Along with errors in affixed words, these relationships provide cues of early detection of derivational morphology in child speech.

Keywords: affixed words, converted words, morphological errors, compounds
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French derivational morphology in the target system
    • 2.1Noun formation
    • 2.2Verb formation
    • 2.3Adjective formation
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Data
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Suffixation
      • 4.1.1Nominal suffixes
      • 4.1.2Adjectival suffixes
      • 4.1.3Errors
      • 4.1.4Development of semantic categories
    • 4.2Prefixation
    • 4.3Conversion
      • 4.3.1N-V pairs
        • 4.3.1.1Homophonous N-V pairs
        • 4.3.1.2N-V pairs with modification
      • 4.3.2Verbs derived from adjectives
      • 4.3.3Adjectives converted from verbs (PP, PPres, sg. pres. ind.)/deverbal adjectives
    • 4.4ADS
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.66.03kil
References (49)
Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M.
2015 A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (eds), 478–510. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amiot, D.
2004 Préfixes ou prépositions? Le cas de sur(-), sans(-), contre(-) et les autres. Lexique 16: 67–83.Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D.
2002 La construction du lexique français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2007 La préfixation en RE-, l’antonymie directionnelle et les phénomènes de polarité sémantique. French Language Studies 17: 143–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. & Galmiche, M.
(eds) 1986 La grammaire d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M.
2011 Word formation in Romance. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I, M. Maiden, J. C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 532–563. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. & Plag, I.
2013 The analysis and limits of conversion. In The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, L. Bauer, R. Lieber & I. Plag, 545–567. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béchade, H.-D.
1992 Phonétique et morphologie du français contemporain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bloom, L.
1970 Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Boyé, G.
2005 Construire le paradigme d’un adjectif. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 77–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O., Boyé, G. & Kerleroux, F.
2009 L’allomorphie radicale et la relation flexion–construction. In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 103–126. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Booij, G.
2012 The Grammar of Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V.
1985 The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol.1, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 687–782. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993 The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Lexical creativity in French-speaking children. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 17: 513–530.Google Scholar
Corbin, D.
1987 Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dal, G.
1997 Grammaire du suffixe -et(te). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L.
1994 Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferret, K. & Villoing, F.
2015 French N-age instrumentals: Semantic properties of the base verb. Morphology 25(4): 473–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B.
2003 Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: PUF. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Compounding in French. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fradin, B., Hathout, N. & Meunier, F.
2003 La suffixation en -ET et la question de la productivité. Langue Française 140: 56–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, L.
2015 Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Semantics of Complex Words, L. Bauer, L. Körtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (eds), 115–141. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabar, N., Tribout, D., Dal, G., Fradin, B., Hathout, N., Lignon, S., Namer, F., Plancq, C., Yvon, F. & Zweigenbaum, P.
2006 Production quantitative des suffixations par -ité et -Able dans un corpus journalistique moderne. TALN 2006: 167–175.Google Scholar
Guilbert, L.
1975 La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Huot, H.
2001 Morphologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kerleroux, F.
1996 La coupure invisible. Études de syntaxe et de morphologie. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M.
2017 Early development of compounds in two French children’s corpora. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 91–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Xanthos, A.
2013 The adjective petit ‘small, little’ in French acquisition data: An example of the relationship between pragmatics and morphosyntactic development. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 113–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koehl, A.
2012 La construction morphologique des noms désadjectivaux suffixés en français. PhD dissertation. Université de Lorraine.
Le Grand Robert de la langue française
2018 <[URL]> (2 May 2021).
Lehmann, A. & Martin-Berthet, F.
1998 Introduction à la lexicologie. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Le Robert brio
2012 Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Lippeveld, M. & Oshima-Takane, Y.
2015a Nouns to verbs to and verbs to nouns: When do children acquire class extension rules for deverbal nouns and denominal verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 36(3): 559–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b The effect of input on children’s cross-categorical use of polysemous noun-verb pairs. Language Acquisition 22: 209–239. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Manova, S.
2011 Understanding Morphological Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. & McSweeney, M.
1967 Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin 67(6): 401–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.
1996 Cours de morphologie générale, Vol. III. Montréal: CNRS.Google Scholar
Namer, F. & Villoing, F.
2008 Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -oir(e) du français. In Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: EDP Sciences. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plénat, M.
2008 Le thème L de l’adjectif et du nom. In Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1613–1626. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roché, M.
2009 Un ou deux suffixes? Une ou deux suffixations? In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 143–174. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U.
(eds) 2007 The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trésor de la langue française informatisé (TLFi)
. [URL]> (30 April 2021).
Tribout, D.
2010 Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français. PhD dissertation. Université Paris Diderot.
Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Kilani-Schoch, M., Aksu-Koç, A., Dabašinskienė, I., Hrzica, G., Korecky-Kröll, K., Noccetti, S. & Dressler, W. U.
2013 The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language 33(6): 594–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. & Noccetti, S.
(eds) 2015 Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E.
2017 Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-linguistic, Cross-theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (eds), 381–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Villoing, F.
2012 French compounds. Probus 2: 29–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Forshaw, William
2022. Book Review: Veronica Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler (Eds.), The acquisition of derivational morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective. First Language 42:5 ► pp. 696 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.