Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 5483
References

References

Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E. V. M.
2015A constructivist account of child language acquisition. In Handbook of Language Emergence, B. MacWhinney & W. O’Grady (eds), 478–510. Hoboken NJ: Wiley Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Amiot, D.
2004Préfixes ou prépositions? Le cas de sur(-), sans(-), contre(-) et les autres. Lexique 16: 67–83.Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D.
2002La construction du lexique français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
2007La préfixation en RE-, l’antonymie directionnelle et les phénomènes de polarité sémantique. French Language Studies 17: 143–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arrivé, M., Gadet, F. & Galmiche, M.
(eds) 1986La grammaire d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
Bauer, B. L. M.
2011Word formation in Romance. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I, M. Maiden, J. C. Smith & A. Ledgeway (eds), 532–563. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bauer, L., Lieber, R. & Plag, I.
2013The analysis and limits of conversion. In The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, L. Bauer, R. Lieber & I. Plag, 545–567. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Béchade, H.-D.
1992Phonétique et morphologie du français contemporain. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Bloom, L.
1970Language Development: Form and Function in Emerging Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonami, O. & Boyé, G.
2005Construire le paradigme d’un adjectif. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 34: 77–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, O., Boyé, G. & Kerleroux, F.
2009L’allomorphie radicale et la relation flexion–construction. In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 103–126. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Booij, G.
2012The Grammar of Words. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Clark, E. V.
1985The acquisition of Romance, with special reference to French. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol.1, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 687–782. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Lexical creativity in French-speaking children. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 17: 513–530.Google Scholar
Corbin, D.
1987Morphologie dérivationnelle et structuration du lexique. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dal, G.
1997Grammaire du suffixe -et(te). Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L.
1994Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferret, K. & Villoing, F.
2015French N-age instrumentals: Semantic properties of the base verb. Morphology 25(4): 473–496. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B.
2003Nouvelles approches en morphologie. Paris: PUF. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Compounding in French. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 417–435. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fradin, B., Hathout, N. & Meunier, F.
2003La suffixation en -ET et la question de la productivité. Langue Française 140: 56–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaeta, L.
2015Lexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Semantics of Complex Words, L. Bauer, L. Körtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (eds), 115–141. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabar, N., Tribout, D., Dal, G., Fradin, B., Hathout, N., Lignon, S., Namer, F., Plancq, C., Yvon, F. & Zweigenbaum, P.
2006Production quantitative des suffixations par -ité et -Able dans un corpus journalistique moderne. TALN 2006: 167–175.Google Scholar
Guilbert, L.
1975La créativité lexicale. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Huot, H.
2001Morphologie. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kerleroux, F.
1996La coupure invisible. Études de syntaxe et de morphologie. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M.
2017Early development of compounds in two French children’s corpora. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 91–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Xanthos, A.
2013The adjective petit ‘small, little’ in French acquisition data: An example of the relationship between pragmatics and morphosyntactic development. Journal of Pragmatics 56: 113–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koehl, A.
2012La construction morphologique des noms désadjectivaux suffixés en français. PhD dissertation. Université de Lorraine.
Le Grand Robert de la langue française
2018 <https://​www​.lerobert​.com> (2 May 2021).
Lehmann, A. & Martin-Berthet, F.
1998Introduction à la lexicologie. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Le Robert brio
2012 Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Lippeveld, M. & Oshima-Takane, Y.
2015aNouns to verbs to and verbs to nouns: When do children acquire class extension rules for deverbal nouns and denominal verbs? Applied Psycholinguistics 36(3): 559–588. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bThe effect of input on children’s cross-categorical use of polysemous noun-verb pairs. Language Acquisition 22: 209–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Manova, S.
2011Understanding Morphological Rules. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marascuilo, L. A. & McSweeney, M.
1967Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin 67(6): 401–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mel’čuk, I.
1996Cours de morphologie générale, Vol. III. Montréal: CNRS.Google Scholar
Namer, F. & Villoing, F.
2008Interpréter les noms déverbaux: Quelle relation avec la structure argumentale du verbe de base? Le cas des noms en -oir(e) du français. In Actes du 1er Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1551–1569. Paris: EDP Sciences. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plénat, M.
2008Le thème L de l’adjectif et du nom. In Actes du Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française 2008, J. Durand, B. Habert & B. Laks (eds), 1613–1626. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roché, M.
2009Un ou deux suffixes? Une ou deux suffixations? In Aperçus de morphologie du français, B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux & M. Plénat (eds), 143–174. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U.
(eds) 2007The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trésor de la langue française informatisé (TLFi)
Tribout, D.
2010Les conversions de nom à verbe et de verbe à nom en français. PhD dissertation. Université Paris Diderot.
Tribushinina, E., van den Bergh, H., Kilani-Schoch, M., Aksu-Koç, A., Dabašinskienė, I., Hrzica, G., Korecky-Kröll, K., Noccetti, S. & Dressler, W. U.
2013The role of explicit contrast in adjective acquisition: A cross-linguistic longitudinal study of adjective production in spontaneous child speech and parental input. First Language 33(6): 594–616. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tribushinina, E., Voeikova, M. & Noccetti, S.
(eds) 2015Semantics and Morphology of Early Adjectives in First Language Acquisition. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E.
2017Noun and verb categories in acquisition: Evidence from fillers and inflectional morphology in French-acquiring children. In Polycategoriality and Lexical Categories: Cross-linguistic, Cross-theoretical and Language Acquisition Approaches [Studies in Language Companion Series 182], V. Vapnarsky & E. Veneziano (eds), 381–411. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villoing, F.
2012French compounds. Probus 2: 29–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar