Chapter published in:
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 217236
References
Argus, R.
2009The early development of case and number in Estonian. In Development of Nominal Inflection in First Language Acquisition. A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, U. Stephany & M. D. Voeikova (eds), 111–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Kausatiivsuse omandamisest eesti keeles (Acquisition of causatives in Estonian). Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Estonian Applied Linguistics) 8: 5–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Acquisition of noun compounds in Estonian. In Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61], W. U. Dressler, F. N. Ketrez & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 165–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Argus, R. & Kazakovskaya, V. V.
2018Acquisition of noun derivation in Estonian and Russian L1. Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat (Yearbook of Society of Estonian Applied Linguistics), 14: 23–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E.
2014Acquisition of derivational morphology. In Handbook of Derivational Morphology, R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 424–442. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U.
2005Morphological typology and first language acquisition: some mutual challenges. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology, G. Booij, E. Guevara, A. Ralli, S. Sgroi & S. Scalise (eds), 7–20. Bologna: Università degli studi di Bologna.Google Scholar
2011The rise of complexity in inflectional morphology. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47: 159–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Kilani-Schoch, M. & Klampfer, S.
2002How does a child detect morphology? Evidence from production. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 151], H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (eds), 391–425. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U. & Merlini Barbaresi, L.
1994Morphopragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Sommer-Lolei, S., Korecky-Kröll, K., Argus, R., Dabašinskienė, I., Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, L., Johansen Ijäs, J., Kazakovskaya, V. V., Laalo, K. & Thomadaki, E.
2019First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami. Morphology 29(3): 409–429. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K.
(ed.) 2014Special volume on Linguistic Complexity. Papers and Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 50(2).Google Scholar
Erelt, M.
(ed.) 2003Estonian Language [Linguistica Uralica Supplementary Series]. Tallinn: Estonian Academy Publishers.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B.
1958The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14(2–3): 150–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kasik, R.
2012Nulltuletus ja konversioon eesti keeles (Zero-derivation and conversion in Estonian). Keel ja Kirjandus 11: 793–806.Google Scholar
2015Sõnamoodustus (Word formation). Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Kerge, K.
1991Morfopragmaatilised seigad eesti tuletuses. (Morphopragmatics of Estonian derivation). In Eesti keele ja kirjanduse kateedri töid 2, J. Õispuu & K. Kerge (eds), 26–30. Tallinn: TPedI.Google Scholar
2003Keele variatiivsus ja mine-tuletus allkeelte süntaktilise keerukuse tegurina (Linguistic varieties and regular nominalization as a factor of their syntactic complicacy). TPÜ humanitaarteaduste dissertatsioonid (Dissertations in Humanities of Tallinn Pedagogical University) 10. Tallinn: TPÜ kirjastus.Google Scholar
2016Word-formation in the individual European languages: Estonian. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 40.5], P. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 3228–3259. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Diakidoy, I. N. & Anderson, R. C.
1993The acquisition of morphology: Learning the contribution of suffixes to the meanings of derivatives. Journal of Reading Behaviour 25(2): 155–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padrik, M.
2010Word-Formation Skills in Estonian Children with Specific Language Impairment [Dissertationes Pedagogicae Universitatis Tartuensis 8]. Tartu: Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus.Google Scholar
Protassova, E. & Voeikova, M.
2007Diminutives at the early stages of acquisition. In Savickienė & Dressler (eds), 43–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sahkai, H.
2011Teine grammatika. Eesti keele teonimede süntaks konstruktsioonipõhises perspektiivis (The syntax of Estonian action nominalizations from the constructional perspective). Tallinn: TLÜK.Google Scholar
Savickienė, I.
2007Form and meaning of diminutives in Lithuanian child language. In Savickienė & Dressler (eds), 13–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savickienė, I. & Dressler, W. U.
(eds) 2007The Acquisition of Diminutives [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vare, S.
2012Eesti keele sõnapered I (Word families in Estonian). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.Google Scholar
Zurek, W. H.
(ed.) 1990Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information. Redwood City CA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar