Part of
The Acquisition of Derivational Morphology: A cross-linguistic perspective
Edited by Veronika Mattes, Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll and Wolfgang U. Dressler
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 66] 2021
► pp. 263288
References
Ahmodova, A.
2016From infinitives to deverbal nominals in the language of Orkhon inscriptions. Journal of Humanities and Social Science 21(8): 17–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksan, M.
2001Agents in Turkish and Their Morphology (Dilbilim İncelemeleri Dizisi) [Linguistics Research Series 3]. Mersin: Mersin University Press.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. & Ketrez, F. N.
2003Early verbal morphology in Turkish: Emergence of inflections. In Mini-paradigms and the Emergence of Verb Morphology, D. Bittner, W. U. Dressler & M. Kilani-Schoch (eds), 27–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D. I.
1985The acquisition of Turkish. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The Data, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 839–878. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Akyol-Bal, Ö. & Sofu, H.
2014Türkçede yeni sözcük oluşturma (Lexical innovations in Turkish). Turkish Studies 9(3): 79–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banguoğlu, T.
1990Türkçenin Grameri (Grammar of Turkish). Ankara: TDK Yay.Google Scholar
Bittner, D., Dressler, W. U. & Kilani-Schoch, M.
2000First Verbs: On the way to Mini-paradigms [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 18]. Berlin: ZAS.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
1985Morphology: A study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
1993The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Çotuksöken, Y.
1980Türkçe’de Ekler-Kökler-Gövdeler (Affixes-roots-stems in Turkish). Istanbul: Alaz Yayınları.Google Scholar
Cüceloğlu, D.
1973Türkçe türetme ekleri üzerine bir çalışma (A study on the Turkish derivation affixes). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi (Hacettepe University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities) 5(1): 47–56.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. U.
1989Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W. U., Ketrez, F. N. & Kilani-Schoch, M.
(eds) 2017Nominal Compound Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 61]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekmekçi, Ö.
1987Creativity in the language acquisition process. In Studies on Modern Turkish, H. E. Boeschoten & L. T. Verhoeven (eds), 203–210. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
1990Coinage of words in child’s lexicon in acquiring Turkish. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, S. Koç (ed.), 27–39. Ankara: Middle East Technical University Publications.Google Scholar
Erdem, M.
2011Türkçede yapım ve çekim eklerinin özellikleri ve sınırları (On the properties and boundaries of derivational and inflectional suffixes in Turkish). Bilig 58: 71–90.Google Scholar
Ergin, M.
1985Türk Dil Bilgisi (Turkish grammar). Istanbul: Boğaziçi Yayınları.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
İleri, E.
2007Überlegungen zur Untersuchung der Verben auf +lA+mAk. (Reflections on the examination of +lA+mAk verbs). In Einheit und Vielfalt in der türkischen Welt: Materialien der 5. Deutschen Turkologenkonferenz Universität Mainz, 4–7 Oktober, 2002 [Turcologica 69], H. Boeschoten & H. Stein (eds), 116–130. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kabadayı, A.
2012Okulöncesi çocukların Türkçe ediniminde yaptıkları kurallaştırma hatalarının incelenmesi (An investigation of preschool children’s overregularization errors in the acquisition of Turkish). Turkish Studies 7(3): 1561–1573.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F. N.
1999Early verbs and the acquisition of Turkish argument structure. MA thesis, Boğaziçi University İstanbul.
2017The emergence of nominal compounds in Turkish: A case-study on structural simplicity vs. input frequency. In Dressler, Ketrez & Kilani-Schoch (eds), 231–249.Google Scholar
Ketrez, F. N. & Aksu-Koç, A.
2007The (scarcity of) diminutives in Turkish child language. In The Acquisition of Diminutives: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 43], I. Savickiene & W. U. Dressler (eds), 279–293. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilani-Schoch, M. & Dressler, W. U.
2002The emergence of inflectional paradigms in two French corpora: An illustration of general problems of pre- and protomorphology. In Pre- and Protomorphology, M. D. Voeikova & W. U. Dressler (eds), 45–59. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Korkmaz, Z.
2003Türkiye Türkçesi Grameri (Şekil Bilgisi) (Turkey Turkish (The form)). Ankara: Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 1: Transcription, Format and Programs. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sebüktekin, H.
1974Morphotactics of Turkish verb suffixations. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Dergisi: Humaniter Bilimler-Humanities 2: 87–116.Google Scholar
Sofu, H.
1995Acquisition of Lexicon in Turkish. PhD dissertation, Çukurova University Adana.
2016Adların ve eylemlerin edinimi (Acquisition of nouns and verbs). Çukurova Üniversitesi Türkoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi (Çukurova University Journal of Turcology Research) 1(1): 90–97.Google Scholar
Stephany, U.
1982Inflectional and lexical morphology – A continuum. Glossologia 1: 27–55.Google Scholar
Uzun, N. E., Uzun, L. S., Aksan, Y. K. & Aksan, M.
1992Türkiye Türkçesinin Türetim Ekleri: Bir Döküm Denemesi (Derivation affixes of Turkey Turkish: A documentation attempt). Ankara: Şirin.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, H.
2011Word formation processes in young bilingual children. In Bilingualism and Migration. G. Extra & L. Verhoeven (eds), 123–142. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, H. & Verhoeven, L. T.
1994Early bilingual development of Turkish children in the Netherlands. In The Cross-linguistic Study of Bilingual Development, G. Extra & L. T. Verhoeven (eds), 51–73. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Verhoeven, L. T.
1988The bilingual child as a word maker: Word formation processes in Turkish and Dutch. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, S. Axmayer, A. Jaisser & H. Singmaster (eds), 232–343. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkens, J.
2016Turkish. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 5, P. O. Müller, I. Ohnheiser, S. Olsen & F. Rainer (eds), 3367–3385. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zülfikar, H.
1991Terim Sorunları ve Terim Yapma Yolları (Terminology problems and ways of terminology derivation). Ankara: Atatürk Kültür Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Atlamaz, Ümit, Ömer Demirok & Metin Bağrıaçık
2023. Heritage grammars as checkpoints in acquisition: A Dependent Case Theoretic account. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1 DOI logo
Ketrez, F. Nihan
2020. Word formation through derivation vs. compounding. In Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 215],  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
Ketrez, F. Nihan
2023. Asymmetry, but where? Terms of address in pet-, infant-, and child-directed speech in Turkish. Taikomoji kalbotyra :20  pp. 149 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.