Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Input, Evidence, and Exposure in Language Acquisition: Studies in honour of Susanne E. Carroll
Edited by Lindsay Hracs
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 69] 2024
► pp. 16–51

Chapter 2
Linguistic approaches to language acquisition

Looking back at the formative years of a unified language acquisition theory

 | University of Hamburg
Acquisition research is an integral part of contemporary linguistic theorizing. 50 years ago, this was not the case. Change came about following a theoretical reorientation that established linguistics as a cognitive science, defining mental grammars as the prime object of study. Here I review an early proposal for developmental psycholinguistics and show how it shaped subsequent research, inspired by grammatical and acquisition theory. Summarizing analyses of German verb placement by L1 and L2 learners, I argue that this research of the 1970–80s achieved important insights into properties of learner grammars, discovered acquisition orders and established similarities as well as differences between L1 and L2 acquisition.
Keywords: L2 acquisition, L1 acquisition, mental grammars, developmental psycholinguistics, morphosyntax
Article outline
  • Avant-propos
  • 1.Beginnings
  • 2.The cognitive turn
  • 3.Developmental psycholinguistics
  • 4.Towards a unified language acquisition theory
  • 5.Linguistic approaches to language development
    • 5.1Grammatical properties to be acquired: An illustrative example
    • 5.2First language acquisition
    • 5.3Second language acquisition
  • 6.The developmental problem
  • 7.Closure
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 26 August 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.69.02mei
References (56)
References
Abutalebi, J. & Clahsen, H. 2016. Variability and its limits in bilingual language production. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(5): 855–856. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borges, J. L. 1960. Del rigor en la ciencia. El Hacedor. Buenos Aires: Emecé Editores.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Hanlon, C. 1970. Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In Cognition and the Development of Language, J. R. Hayes (ed.), 11–53. New York NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. 1893. Sylvie and Bruno Concluded. London: Macmillan. Project Gutenberg, <[URL]> (15 September 2021).
Carroll, S. E. 1989. Language acquisition studies and a feasible theory of grammar. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 34(4): 399–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001. Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20(1): 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
1997. Questions – São Paulo. DELTA 13: 123–128.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1982. Spracherwerb in der Kindheit: Eine Untersuchung zur Entwicklung der Syntax bei Kleinkindern. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1988. Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition, S. Flynn & W. O’Neil (eds), 47–75. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H. & Muysken, P. 1986. The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2(2): 93–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. P. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5(1–4): 161–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A. 2009. Bilingual First Language Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, P. A. & de Villiers, J. G. 1979. Early Language. London: Fontana/Open Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C. & Burt, M. K. 1972. Goofing: An indicator of children’s second language learning strategies. Language Learning 22(2): 235–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H. C., Burt, M. K. & Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
duPlessis, J., Solin, D., Travis, L. & White, L. 1987. UG or not UG, that is the question: A reply to Clahsen and Muysken. Second Language Research 3(1): 56–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, B. P. & Håkansson, G. 2017. Understanding Second Language Processing: A Focus on Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Felix, S. W. (ed.) 1980. Second Language Development: Trends and Issues. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1984. Maturational aspects of Universal Grammar. In Interlanguage, A. Davies, C. Criper & A. Howatt (eds), 133–161. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1966. How to learn to talk: Some simple ways. In The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, F. Smith & G. A. Miller (eds), 105–122. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. 1996. The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds), 49–81. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Guilfoyle, E. & Noonan, M. 1992. Functional categories and language acquisition, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37(2): 241–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. 1989. An interview with Werner F. Leopold. The Bilingual Research Group Working Papers, 1–17. UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics across Cultures. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, W. F. 1939, 1947, 1949/1970. Speech Development of a Bilingual Child: A Linguist’s Record. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press. (Reprinted in 1970, New York NY: AMS Press)Google Scholar
MacDonald, D. & Carroll, S. E. 2018. Second language processing of English mass-count nouns by native speakers of Korean. Glossa 3(1): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. 1966. Developmental psycholinguistics. In The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, F. Smith & G. A. Miller (eds), 15–84. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. 1991. Principles of Universal Grammar and strategies of language use. In Point – Counterpoint: Universal Grammar in the Second Language, L. Eubank (ed.), 231–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. Getting FAT: The role of Finiteness, Agreement and Tense in early grammars. In Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development, J. M. Meisel (ed.), 89–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. The bilingual child. In The Handbook of Bilingualism, T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (eds), 91–113. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007. On autonomous syntactic development in multiple first language acquisition. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, H. Caunt-Nulton, S. Kulatilake & I.-H. Woo (eds), 26–45. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
2011. First and Second Language Acquisition: Parallels and Differences. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M. 1981. On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. 1976. Zur Logik der frühkindlichen Sprachentwicklung: Empirische Untersuchungen und Theoriediskussion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Müller, N. 1994. Parameters cannot be reset: Evidence from the development of COMP. In Bilingual First Language Acquisition: French and German Grammatical Development, J. M. Meisel (ed.), 235–269. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pavlovitch, M. 1920. Le langage enfantin: Acquisition du serbe et du français par un enfant serbe. Paris: Librairie Ancienne H. Champion.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (ed.) 1993. Adult Second Language Acquisition: Crosslinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Wexler, K. 1993. The full competence hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69(1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prévost, P. & White, L. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16(2): 103–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ronjat, J. 1913. Le développement du langage observé chez un enfant bilingue. Paris: Librairie Ancienne H. Champion.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1916/1975. Cours de linguistique générale. Edited by C. Bally & A. Sechehaye/T. de Mauro. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1966. Comments on ‘Developmental psycholinguistics’: A discussion of McNeill’s presentation. In The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, F. Smith & G. A. Miller (eds), 85–91. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1985. Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues, D. I. Slobin (ed.), 1157–1256. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Smith, F. & Miller, G. A. (eds) 1966. The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1966. Introduction. In The Genesis of Language: A Psycholinguistic Approach, F. Smith & G. A. Miller (eds), 1–13. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stern, C. & Stern, W. 1907/1975. Die Kindersprache. Leipzig: Barth. (Reprinted in 1975, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 2007. Acquiring linguistic constructions. In Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. II: Cognition, Perception, and Language, W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, D. Kuhn, & R. Siegler (eds.), 255–298. New York NY: Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. 2014. Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(3): 283–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. 1981. Learning a Second Language. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar