Edited by Anne Dahl, Marta Velnić and Kjersti Faldet Listhaug
[Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 70] 2024
► pp. 241–264
A key question in second language research is whether native (L1) and non-native (L2) sentence processing are fundamentally different. Recent L1 research has questioned the assumption that passives are harder to process than actives: passive complexity appears to be determined by event structure (Paolazzi et al., 2019; Paolazzi et al., 2021). We replicate these results using a maze task; only passives of states appear to be more difficult to process than actives, inconsistent with a good-enough account. We also present evidence that L2 learners can recruit similarly nuanced processing mechanisms in understanding passives. L2 learners display the same interaction of event structure and passivization. Taken together, the results appear inconsistent with shallow processing accounts of both L1 and L2 processing.