Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp. 131


Unarticulated constituents and neo-Gricean pragmatics


Atlas, Jay D. & Levinson, Stephen C.
1981It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent
1994Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language 9(2). 124–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 28 ]
2000Quantification, qualification and context: A reply to Stanley and Szabó. Mind & Language 15(2–3). 262–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Pragmatics and the philosophy of language. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 463–487. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2012Context dependence. In Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel & Kolbel, Max (eds.), The Continuum companion to the philosophy of language, 153–184. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2017Contextualism and semantic minimalism. In Huang, Yan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, 21–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borg, Emma
2005Saying what you mean: Unarticulated constituents and communication. In Elugardo, Reinaldo & Stainton, Robert J. (eds.), Ellipsis and nonsentential speech, 237–262. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie
2007The myth of unarticulated constituents. In O’Rourke, Michael & Washington, Corey (eds.), Situating semantics: Essays on the philosophy of John Perry, 199–214. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In Soria, Belén & Romero, Esther (eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition), 217–285. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan
1971Some remarks on Grice’s views about the logical particles of natural language. In Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua (ed.), Pragmatics of natural languages, 50–68. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crimmins, Mark
1992Talk about beliefs. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Alison
2008Free enrichment or hidden indexicals? Mind & Language 23(4). 426–456. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Schiffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2004Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Neo-Gricean pragmatics: A Manichaean manifesto. In Burton-Roberts, Noel (ed.), Pragmatics, 158–183. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2012Implying and inferring. In Allan, Keith & Jaszczolt, Kasia M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 69–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
1991A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics 27(2). 301–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992aAgainst Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics 17(1). 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992bHanyu de kongfanchou [Empty categories in Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [ Studies of the Chinese Language ] 1992(5). 384–393.Google Scholar
[ p. 29 ]
1994/2007The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: A study with special reference to Chinese (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004Anaphora and the pragmatics-syntax interface. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 288–314. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2005Pragmatic intrusion into what is said: Explicature, pragmatically enriched ‘said’, implicIture or implicAture? (Paper presented at the 27th Annual Meeting of the German Linguistic Society, Cologne, 23–26 February 2005.)
2007Pragmatics (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011Types of inference: Entailment, presupposition, and implicature. In Bublitz, Wolfram & Norrick, Neal R. (eds.), Foundations of pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 1), 397–422. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Relevance and neo-Gricean pragmatic principles. In Schmid, Hans-Jörg (ed.), Cognitive pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics 4), 25–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aMicro- and macro-pragmatics: Remapping their terrains. International Review of Pragmatics 5(1). 129–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bBayesian probabilistic model of discourse anaphoric comprehension, linguistic typology, and neo-Gricean pragmatics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(1–2). 95–108.Google Scholar
2013c De se attitude/belief ascription and neo-Gricean truth-conditional pragmatics: Logophoric expressions in West African languages and long-distance reflexives in East, South, and Southeast Asian languages. In Feit, Neil & Capone, Alessandro (eds.), Attitude de se: Linguistics, epistemology, metaphysics, 185–209. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2013dLogophoricity and neo-Gricean truth-conditional pragmatics. In Capone, Alessandro & Lo Piparo, Franco & Carapezza, Marco (eds.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 2), 217–241. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Pragmatics (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics). 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015Neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of conversational implicature. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 615–639. 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016Pragmatics: Language use in context. In Allan, Keith (ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics, 205–220. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017aImplicature. In Huang, Yan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, 155–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017bNeo-Gricean pragmatics. In Huang, Yan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of pragmatics, 47–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2017cImplicitness in the lexis: Lexical narrowing and neo-Gricean pragmatics. In Cap, Piotr & Dynel, Marta (eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 276), 67–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2017dThe Oxford handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J.
1972Semantic theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
[ p. 30 ]
King, Jeffrey C.
2007The nature and structure of content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
King, Jeffrey C. & Stanley, Jason
2005Semantics, pragmatics, and the role of semantic content. In Szabó, Zoltán Gendler (ed.), Semantics versus pragmatics, 111–164. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul
1977Speaker’s reference and semantic reference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2(1). 255–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul A.
1980Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: A partial pragmatic reduction of Binding and Control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23(1987). 379–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, John
2007Semantic minimalism and nonindexical contextualism. In Preyer, Gerhard & Peter, Georg (eds.), Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism: New essays on semantics and pragmatics, 240–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marti, Luisa
2006Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(2). 135–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1995Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12(2). 109–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara H.
1989Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. In Wiltshire, Caroline & Graczyk, Randolph & Music, Bradley (eds.), CLS 25: Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 342–365. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Perry, John
1986Thought without representation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volumes 60. 137–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993The problem of the essential indexical: And other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1998Indexicals, contexts, and unarticulated constituents. In Aliseda-Llera, Atocha & Van Glabbeek, Rob & Westerståhl, Dag (eds.), Computing natural language, 1–11. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Recanati, François
1993Direct reference: From language to thought. Oxford. Blackwell.Google Scholar
2002Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(3). 299–345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007It is raining (somewhere). Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 123–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Truth-conditional pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saul, Jennifer M.
2002What is said and psychological reality: Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 347–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Stephen
1977Naming and knowing. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2(1). 28–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sennet, Adam
2011Unarticulated constituents and propositional structure. Mind & Language 26(4). 412–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
[ p. 31 ]
Stainton, Robert
2006Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason
2000Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4). 391–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Making it articulated. Mind & Language 17(1–2). 149–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Semantics in context. In Preyer, Gerhard & Peter, Georg (eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth, 221–254. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason & Szabó, Zoltán Gendler
2000aOn quantifier domain restriction. Mind & Language 15(2–3). 219–261. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000bReply to Bach and Neale. Mind & Language 15(2–3). 295–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Kenneth A.
2001Sex, breakfast, and descriptus interruptus. Synthese 128(1–2). 45–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, Begoña & Groefsema, Marjolein
2013Something out of nothing? Rethinking unarticulated constituents. Journal of Pragmatics 47(1). 108–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Ralph C. S.
1975Conversational implicatures. In Blackburn, Simon (ed.), Meaning, reference, and necessity: New studies in semantics, 133–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westerståhl, Dag
1985Determiners and context sets. In van Benthem, Johan & ter Meulen, Alice (eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural languages, 45–72. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Huang, Aijun & Stephen Crain
2014. Acquisition of the numerical wh-pronoun ji ‘how many’ in Mandarin Chinese. Lingua 145  pp. 122 ff. Crossref logo
Huang, Yan
2021.  In Inquiries in Philosophical Pragmatics [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 28],  pp. 33 ff. Crossref logo
Li, Xiaochen & Mingyou Xiang
2019. Semantic evolution at the microscopic level: the case of suoyi. Language Sciences 74  pp. 110 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.