Article published in:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2018) ► pp. 3260
References

References

Al-Dobaian, Abdullah
2014Towards a morphological theory: The case of Arabic broken and sound plurals. Journal of Arts 26(3). 19–36.Google Scholar
Alħalawaani, Mohammed
1987AlWaadiħ fiiilm alSarf [ Explaining morphology clearly ]. Damascus: Dar alMamuun lilturaath [Almamuun Heritage Publishing Company].Google Scholar
Alegre, Maria A. & Gordon, Peter
1996Red rats eater exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition 60. 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berent, Iris & Pinker, Steven
2007The dislike of regular plurals in compounds: Phonological familiarity or morphological constraint? The Mental Lexicon 2(2). 129–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Compound formation is constrained by morphology: A reply to Seidenberg, MacDonald & Haskell. The Mental Lexicon 3(2). 176–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 59 ]
Booij, Geert
2016Construction morphology. In Hippisley, Andrew & Stump, Gregory (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology, 390–423. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1988On the morphological parallelism between compounds and constructs. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 45–65. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2009Afro-Asiatic, semitic: Hebrew. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 491–511. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, Roderick A. & Rosenbaum, Peter S. (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar, 184–221. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Almazan, Mayella
2001Compounding and inflection in language impairment: Evidence from Williams Syndrome (and SLI). Lingua 111(10). 729–757. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Marcus, Gary & Bartke, Susanne & Wiese, Richard
1995Compounding and inflection in German child language. In Booij, Geert & van Marle, Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology, 115–142. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987On the definition of word. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Doron, Edit & Meir, Irit
2013Construct state: Modern Hebrew. In Khan, Geoffrey (ed.), Encyclopedia of Hebrew language and linguistics, 581–589. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter
1985Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition 21(1985). 73–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1973Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. Linguistic Inquiry 4(1). 3–16.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay (eds.), The view from building 20, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2002Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Language, consciousness, culture: Essays on mental structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2009Compounding in the parallel architecture and conceptual semantics. In Lieber, Rochelle & Štekauer, Pavol (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding, 105–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Justin Robert
2013The syntax-semantics interface in distributed morphology. Washington, DC: Georgetown University. (Doctoral dissertation.) Retrieved from https://​repository​.library​.georgetown​.edu​/bitstream​/handle​/10822​/558391​/Kelly​_georgetown​_0076D​_12290​.pdf​?sequence​=1​&isAllowed​=y
Kiparsky, Paul
1982From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In Hulst, Harry van der & Smith, Norval (eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part 1), 131–175. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Li, Yafei
1990X°-binding and verb incorporation. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 399–426.Google Scholar
2005X°: A theory of the morphology-syntax interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1983Argument-linking and compounds in English. Linguistics Inquiry 14(2). 251–285.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J.
1993Template form in prosodic morphology. In Staven, Laurel Smith (ed.), Papers from the Third Annual Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica Conference, 187–218. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
[ p. 60 ]
McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Allan S.
1990Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8(2). 209–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, Steven
1999Words and rules: the ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, Robert R.
1990Arabic broken plurals: Arguments for a two-fold classification of morphology. In Eid, Mushira & McCarthy, John (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Volume II: Salt Lake City, Utah 1988, 94–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Prosodic templates in a word-based morphological analysis of Arabic. In Eid, Mushira & Ratcliffe, Robert R. (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics. Volume X: Salt Lake City, 1996, 147–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Toward a universal theory of shape-invariant (templatic) morphology: Classical Arabic reconsidered. In Singh, Rajendra & Starosta, Stanley (eds.), Explorations in seamless morphology, 212–269. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold
2000Decomposing the construct. Chicago: University of Chicago. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.
1982The syntax of words. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel
2006Minimize exponence: economy effects on a model of the morphosyntactic component of the grammar. Tucson: University of Arizona. (Doctoral dissertation.) Retrieved from http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/000514​/current​.pdf
Siegel, Dorothy C.
1974Topics in English morphology. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.) Retrieved from http://​www​.ai​.mit​.edu​/projects​/dm​/theses​/siegel74​.pdf
Sneed, Elisa
2002The acceptability of regular plurals in compounds. In Andronis, Mary & Debenport, Erin & Pycha, Anne & Yoshimura, Keiko (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society 38: The main session, 617–631. Chicago: The Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard William
1985On deriving the lexicon. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Webelhuth, Gert
1995Government and binding theory and the minimalist program: Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1981On the notions “lexically related” and the “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2). 245–274.Google Scholar
Wright, William
1971A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Translated with amendments and additions from the German of Caspari.)Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2008When morphology comes in. (Paper presented at Morphology Workshop, Grooßbothen, 21 June 2008.)