Scalarity, degree reading and maximality in a Mandarin numeral construction
This paper investigates the semantics of an understudied Mandarin numeral construction type, here dubbed
da-NumPs (i.e. number word < da ‘big’ < noun). Drawing primarily upon evidence from
online Mandarin corpora, we argue for a taxonomy of this construction that comprises two distinct interpretations, based on the
scalarity of the morpheme da and its composition with the other constituents within the construction.
Specifically, one reading of da-NumPs is a degree superlative reading, in which da relates a
domain of comparison, denoted by the nominal argument, to a plural group of entities ranked along the upper bound of a
contextually determined scale. Second, da-NumPs have a definite description reading, in which da
behaves on a par with a maximality-denoting iota operator, such that the construction refers to the maximal group individual that
satisfies the property denoted by the nominal argument. We further show that at the discourse level, both readings encode the way
the speaker subjectively construes the situation being described, indicating the speaker’s evaluative attitude towards the
significance of said situation. This pragmatic condition distinguishes the use of da-NumPs against that of
alternative, truth-conditionally identical numeral construction types. We further propose that in cases where the nominal
component includes a degree argument, a process of degree intensification enables the definite description reading to verify the
same situation as is licensed under a superlative semantics. We show that this process provides a way to make sense of the
systematic ambiguity available to da-NumPs, and allows us to capture its polysemy.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.A taxonomy of meanings
- 2.1Plural degree superlatives
- 2.2Definite description
- 3.Interpreting the meanings
- 3.1Formalization
- 3.2Superlativeness and invited superlative inference
- 3.3Comparison class restriction and domain shift
- 4.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
References
Aihara, Masahiko
2009 The scope of -est: Evidence from Japanese.
Natural Language Semantics 171. 341–367.


Brinton, Laurel & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Canavan, Alexandra & Zipperlen, George
1996 CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect LDC96S55. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium. (
[URL]) (Accessed 2018-11-22)
Carlson, Greg
2015 Naming, noncompositionality and etymology. (Talk presented at the 27th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI 2015), Barcelona, 3–14 August, 2015.)
Chen, Jun
2016 Discourse prominence induces semantic change: Evidence from Chinese.
University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 71–80.

Cheng, Lisa & Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
2017 Two levels of definiteness. In
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka (ed.),
Proceedings of GLOW in Asia 111, 79–93. Singapore: The National University of Singapore.

Coppock, Elizabeth & Josefson, Christian
2015 Completely bare Swedish superlatives. In
Eva Csipak &
Hedde Zeijlstra (eds.),
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 191, 179–196. Göttingen: Universität Göttingen.

Dayal, Veneeta
1997 Free choice and ever: Identity and free choice readings. In
Lawson, Aaron (ed.),
Proceedings of SALT 71, 99–116. Stanford: Stanford University.


Farkas, Donka & Bruce, Kim
2010 On reacting to assertions and polar questions.
Journal of Semantics 271. 81–118.


Farkas, Donka & Kiss, Katalin E.
2000 On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 181. 417–455.


Fitzgibbons, Natalia & Sharvit, Yael & Gajewski, Jon
2008 Plural superlatives and distributivity. In
Friedman, Tova &
Ito, Satoshi (eds.),
Semantics and Linguistic Theory 181. 302–318.
[URL]
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2001 The meaning of free choice.
Linguistics and Philosophy 241. 659–735.


Heim, Irene
1995 Superlatives: A case study on the division of labor of syntax and semantics. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Manuscript.)

Heim, Irene
2015 Definiteness and indefiniteness. In
Von Heusinger Klaus &
Maienborn, Claudia &
Portner, Paul (eds.),
Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 21, 996–1025. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tanya
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Jin, Dawei & Chen, Jun
2018 Meaning change in Chinese: A numeral phrase construction from adjectives to superlatives to definite descriptions.
Linguistics 56(3). 599–651.


Kadmon, Nirit & Landman, Fred
1993 Any.
Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422.


Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
2005 Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates.
Language 81(2). 345–381.

Klein, Ewan
1980 A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives.
Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1). 1–45.


Kneale, William
1962 Modality de dicto and de re. In
Nagel, Ernest &
Suppes, Patrick &
Tarski, Alfred (eds.),
Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, 622–633. San Francisco: Stanford University Press.

Krasikova, Sveta
2012 Definiteness in superlatives. In
Aloni, M. &
Kimmelman, V. &
Roelofsen, F. &
Sassoon, G. &
Schulz, K. &
Westera, M. (eds.),
Logic, language and meaning (Proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium), 411–420. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
[URL].

Kripke, Saul
1980 Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Langacker, Ronald
2007 Cognitive grammar. In
Geeraerts, Dirk &
Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 421–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Li, Shengmei
2003 The usage of “da” in the “ten da popular songs” structure.
Xiuci Xuexi [
Rhetoric Learning] 13(5). 14–15.

Li, Xiaoyun
2004 Characteristics of the nouns in “num + da + noun” phrases.
Journal of Qinghai Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) 61. 112–114.

Link, Godehard
1983 The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In
Bäuerle, Rainer &
Schwarze, Christoph &
Von Stechow, Arnim (eds.),
Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: de Gruyter.

McEnery, Tony & Xiao, Richard
2004 The Lancaster corpus of Mandarin Chinese: A corpus for monolingual and contrastive language study.
[URL] (Accessed 2018-11-29.)
McNabb, Yaron
2012 The syntax and semantics of degree modification. Chicago: University of Chicago. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Partee, Barbara
1995 Lexical semantics and compositionality. In
Gleitman, Lila &
Liberman, Mark (eds.),
An invitation to cognitive science: Language, vol. 11, 311–360. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Rett, Jessica
2014 The semantics of evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Sharvit, Yael & Stateva, Penka
2000 Against ‘long’ movement of the superlative operator.
Proceedings of SALT 101, 185–202. Ithaca: Cornell University.


Sharvy, Richard
1980 A more general theory of definite descriptions.
The Philosophical Review 89(4). 607–624.


Simpson, Andrew & Soh, Hooi Ling & Nomoto, Hiroki
Stateva, Penka
2002 How different are different degree constructions. Storrs: University of Connecticut. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Su, Danjie
2017 Significance as a lens: Understanding the Mandarin ba construction through discourse adjacent alternation.
Journal of Pragmatics 1171. 204–230.


Szabolcsi, Anna
1986 Comparative superlatives.
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 81. 245–266.

Tai, James
1982 Relevant categorical distinctions in Chinese.
Papers from the Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society 181. 495–506.

Tai, James
1994 Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In
Chen, Matthew &
Tzeng, Ovid,
In honor of William S.-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, 479–494. Taipei: Pyramid.

Tao, Hongyin & Xiao, Richard
2012 The UCLA Chinese Corpus (2nd edn). Lancaster: UCREL.
[URL] (Accessed 2018-11-30.)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[URL].


Vendler, Zeno
1967 Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.


Verhagen, Arie
2007 Construal and perspectivization. In
Geeraerts, Dirk &
Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.),
The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 48–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Von Fintel, Kai
1994 Restrictions on quantifier domains. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)

Von Fintel, Kai & Fox, Danny & Iatridou, Sabine
2014 Definiteness as maximal informativeness. In
Crnič, Luka &
Sauerland, Uli (eds.),
The art and craft of semantics: A festschrift for Irene Heim, 165–174. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
[URL]
Von Stechow, Arnim
1984 Comparing semantic theories of comparison.
Journal of Semantics 3(1). 1–77.


Xu, Guangcan
2005 “Da” in “ten da popular songs” should not be viewed as a classifier: A reply to Li (2003).
Xiuci Xuexi [
Rhetoric Learning] 15(1). 64–65.

Yang, Jilin
2013 Taipingjing Yizhu [
Translations and Annotations of Taipingjing]. Beijing: Zhonghua Publishing House.

Yang, Lu
1999 Shi shuo “shu+da+ming” geshi [A preliminary analysis of the “number+da+noun” format].
Yuwen Jianshe [
Language Planning] 11. 18–21.

Yu, Baocheng
1999 Baihua ershisi shi-Jinshu [
The twenty-four histories in Modern Chinese-Book of Jin]. Beijing: The Chinese Overseas Publishing House.

Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Su, Danjie
2022.
Factuality lens.
Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:2
► pp. 242 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.