From caused-motion to spatial configuration
Placement verbs in Mandarin
This study re-examines Mandarin Placement verbs from a lexical-constructional perspective and redefines the class
with semantic-to-syntactic properties pertaining to lexicalization patterns in Mandarin. It aims to show that Placement verbs
lexicalize a cognitively salient causal chain that extends from an agentive motion to locational change and to resultant spatial
configuration. The event chain serves as the conceptual basis for linking motion-triggered events and states that are
syntactically distinct in profiling the three contingent stages: caused to move → caused to be → spatially grounded. Although
English Placement verbs (put, hang, etc.) are typically taken to be exemplars of the caused-motion construction, this study shows
that Placement verbs may be distinguished syntactically and semantically from pure Caused-Motion verbs and posture-based Spatial
Configuration verbs. While the three classes of verbs may be viewed as demonstrating respectively the individuated stages of the
proposed event chain, Placement verbs are the only class that encompasses all three event types in their meanings and are
associated with a wide range of semantically compatible constructions. The three stages are discussed with graphical
representations and collocational distinctions. Further sub-classifications of the Mandarin Placement verbs are provided with
different semantic profiles for each subclass. Crucial to the analysis is the fact that location-profiled uses of Placement verbs
outnumber path-profiled uses in Mandarin, indicating a categorical shift from motional to locational predication. By teasing out
the language-specific and class-specific lexicalization patterns that are collo-constructionally definable, the study demonstrates
the usefulness of a lexical-constructional approach in fine-tuning verbal semantic distinctions for cross-linguistic and
cross-categorial comparisons.
Article outline
-
1.Introduction
- 1.1Mandarin Placement verbs
- 1.2The database and methodology
- 2.Previous studies of Placement verbs
- 2.1Placement as a subtype of caused-motion event
- 2.2Studies on Mandarin Placement verbs
- 2.3Theoretical approach: Lexical-constructional approach
- 3.Redefining Mandarin Placement verbs: From caused-motion to spatial configuration
- 3.1Distinct properties of Mandarin Placement verbs
- 3.2Placement verbs vs. caused motion verbs and posture verbs
- 3.3Placement verbs encode an event chain
- 3.4Constructional features associated with the event chain
- 4.Further discussions
- 4.1Language-specific lexicalization pattern
- 4.2Lexical vs. typological properties
- 5.Potential subclasses of Placement verbs in Mandarin
- 5.1Subclass 1: Placing at a location
- 5.2Subclass 2: Placing into a container
- 5.3Subclass 3: Placing onto a surface
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (75)
References
Ameka, Felix K. & Levinson, Stephen C. 2007. Introduction: The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics 451. 847–872. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, Hans C. 2003. A lexical-constructional account of the locative alternation. In Carmichael, Lesley & Huang, Chia-Hui & Samiian, Vida (eds.), Proceedings of the thirtieth Western Conference in Linguistics WELCO 2001, 27–42. Fresno: Department of Linguistics, California State University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bowerman, Melissa & Gullberg, Marianne & Majid, Asifa & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2004. Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Majid, Asifa (ed.), Field Manual Volume 91, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan. 1990. The syntactic projection problem and the comparative syntax of locative inversion. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 5(4). 375–396.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, Jui-Ching. 2015. Verbal semantics and eventive inference: The case of fàng in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Chiao Tung University. (Master’s thesis.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, Jung-Hsing. 2003. State eventualities and aspect marker le in Chinese. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 1(1). 97–110.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Ying & Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. 2014. The Mandarin LVS construction: Verb lexical semantics and grammatical aspect. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1), 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Yi-Ling. 2009. On syntax and semantics of Placement verbs in Mandarin Chinese. Tainan: National Cheng Kung University. (Master’s Thesis.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Shan-Shan. 2008. The comparative research of caused motion construction in English and Mandarin: Based on case study of English verbs of putting and their Chinese correspondents. Shanghai: Shanghai University. (Master’s thesis.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chu, Chauncey. 2016. A study of “perfectivity”, “boundedness” and “the looming le1” from the interface of semantics, syntax and discourse (in Chinese). In Chin, Andy & Kwok, Bit-Chee & Tsou, Benjamin K. (eds.), The Commemorative Essays for Yuen Ren Chao, Father of Modern Chinese Linguistics, 161–172. Taipei: Crane.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 1990. Possible verbs and the structure of events. In Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed), Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization, 48–73. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William & Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Boston: Kluwer Academic. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1968. The case for case. In Bach, Emmon & Harms, Robert T. (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 1–25: Holt Rinehart & Winston.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. & Atkins, Beryl T. 1992. Towards a frame-based organization of the lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In Lehrer, Adrienne & Kittay, Eva (eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantics and lexical organization, 75–102. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gawron, Jean M. 1986. Situations and prepositions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9(3). 327–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 2010. Verbs, constructions, and semantic frames. In Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Doron, Edit & Sichel, Ivy (eds.), Syntax, lexical semantics and event structure, 39–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2). 199–244. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansson, Kristina & Bruce, Barbro. 2002. Verbs of placement in Swedish children with SLI. International Journal of Communication Disorders 37(4). 401–414. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwata, Seizi. 2004. Over-prefixation: A lexical constructional approach. English Language and Linguistics 8(2). 239–292. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iwata, Seizi. 2005a. Locative alternation and two levels of verb meaning. Cognitive Linguistics 16(2). 355–407. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar, vol. 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lemmens, Maarten. 2006. Caused posture: Experiential patterns emerging from corpus research. In Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 261–296. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1991. Wiping the slate clean: A lexical semantic exploration. Cognition 41(1–3). 123–151. [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1996. Lexical semantics and syntactic structure. In Lappin, S. (ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, 487–507. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Feng-Hsi. 1997. An aspectual analysis of BA. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 61. 51–99. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun. 2002. Verbs of surface contact in Mandarin: A lexical semantic study. In Su, Lily I-wen & Lien, Chinfa & Chui, Kawai (eds.), Form and function: Linguistic studies in honor of Shuanfan Huang, 275–303. Taipei: Crane.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun. 2017. The Chinese mind: What can Chinese tell us about grammar--a non-English biased view. (Paper presented at
the 62nd Annual Conference of International Linguistic Association
, Hong Kong, 26–28 May, 2017).
Liu, Meichun. 2018. Kuang jia wei ben gou shi wei yong ji yu yu liao ku shi zheng de han yu dong ci yu yi fen xi yu fen lei 框架為本,構式為用:基於語料庫實證的漢語動詞語義分析與分類 [A frame-based morpho-constructional approach to verbal semantics]. In Kit, Chunyu & Liu, Meichun (eds.), Empirical and corpus linguistic frontiers. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun & Chang, Che-Wei. 2015. A lexical-constructional approach to verbal semantics: The case of Mandarin ‘hang’ verbs. International Journal of Knowledge and Language Processing 6(4). 1–19.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun & Chang, Jui-Ching. 2015a. Redefining locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese: A lexical-constructional approach. In Tao, Hongyin & Lee, Yu-Hui & Su, Danjie & Tsurumi, Keiko & Wang, Wei & Yang, Ying Yang (eds.), Proceeding of the 27th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (27th NACCL), 439–461. Los Angeles: UCLA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun & Chang, Jui-Ching. 2015b. Semantic profile as a source of polysemy: Insight from the spatial-configuration verb fàng in Mandarin. In Lu, Qin & Gao, Helena Hong (eds.), Chinese lexical semantics (CLSW15), 24–32. Switzerland: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun & Chang, Jui-Ching. 2017. From placement to positioning: Spatial configuration verbs in Mandarin. (Paper presented at the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics (IACL 25), Budapest, 25–27 June, 2017).
Liu, Meichun & Chang, Jui-ching. 2018. Placement verbs in Chinese and English: A contrastive study of lexicalization patterns. In Hong, Jia-Fei & Su, Qi & Wu, Jiun-Shiung (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW 2018), 163–197. Switzerland: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meichun & Tsai, Hsin-shan & Hu, Chia-yin & Chou, Shu-ping. 2015. The proto-motion event schema: Integrating lexical semantics and morphological sequencing. Journal of Chinese Linguistic 43(2). 503–547. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luo, Yun-Pu. 2011. The study of the polysemous verb ‘fang4’ in Mandarin Chinese. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Master’s thesis.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Narasimhan, Bhuvana & Gullberg, Marianne. 2011. The role of input frequency and semantic transparency in the acquisition of verb meaning: Evidence from Placement verbs in Tamil and Dutch. Journal of Child Language 38(3). 504–532. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Narasimhan, Bhuvana & Kopecka, Anetta & Bowerman, Melissa & Gullberg, Marianne & Majid, Asifa. 2012. Putting and taking events: A crosslinguistic perspective. In Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pan, Haihua. 1996. Imperfective aspect zhe, agent deletion, and locative inversion in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14(2). 409–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pauwels, Paul. 2000. Put, set, lay, and place: A cognitive linguistic approach to verbal meaning. Munich: Lincom.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven. 1991. Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piñón, Christopher. 2001. A finer look at the causative-inchoative alternation. In Hastings, Rachel & Jackson, Brendan & Zvolenszky, Zsofia (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Vol. 111, 346–364. Ithaca: Cornell University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pustejovsky, James. 1991. The syntax of event structure. Cognition 41(1). 47–81. [URL]. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schäfer, Florian. 2009. The causative alternation. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(2). 641–681. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Serra Borneto, Carlo. 1996. Liegen and stehen in German: A study in horizontality and verticality. In Casad, Eugene H. (ed.), Cognitive linguistics in redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics, 459–505. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shi, Ziqiang. 1990. ‘Decomposition of perfectivity and inchoativity and the meaning of the particle le in Mandarin Chinese’. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 181. 95–124.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Slobin, Dan I. & Bowerman, Melissa & Brown, Penelope & Eisenbeiß, Sonja & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 2011. Putting things in places: Developmental consequences of linguistic typology. In Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Pederson, Eric (eds.), Event representation in language and cognition, 134–165. New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sybesma, Rint. 1992. Causatives and accomplishments: The case of Chinese ba. Leiden: Leiden University. (PhD dissertation).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tai, James H-Y. 2006. Jingtai kongjian guanxi zai Zhongwen jufa de chengxian 靜態空間關係在中文句法的呈現 [Representation of stative spatial relation in Mandarin syntax]. Xiandai Zhongguoyu Yanjiu [Comtemporary Chinese Studies] 81. 1–7.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description vol. 31: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tham, Siao Wei. 2012. Result in Mandarin verb compounds. In Guevara, Ana Aguilar & Chernilovskaya, Anna & Nouwen, Rick (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16, vol. 21, 599–612.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tham, Siao Wei. 2013. Change of state verbs and result state adjectives in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Linguistics 49(3). 647–701. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsao, Feng-Fu. 1978. Subject and topic in Chinese. In Cheng, Robert L. & Li, Yingzhe & Tang, Tingchi (eds.), Proceedings of Symposium on Chinese Linguistics, 1977 Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, 165–196. Taipei: Student Book.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsao, Feng-Fu. 1979. A functional study of topic in Chinese: The first step towards discourse analysis. Taipei: Student Book.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, Enric & Engdahl, Elisabet. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics 34(3). 459–519. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, William S-Y. 1965. Two aspect markers in Mandarin. Language 41(3). 457–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Feng. 1998a. Xiandai Hanyu zhifang dongci peijia yanjiu 現代漢語置放動詞配價研究 [The valency of Placement verbs in Modern Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue Yu Yanjiu [Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies] 31. 86–101.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Feng. 1998b. Xiandai Hanyu zhifanglei dongci jiqi yuyi cifanchou 現代漢語置放類動詞及其語義次範疇 [Placement verbs in Modern Chinese and the their sub-classifications]. Hanyu Xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 21. 19–23.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Su-Ying & Pan, Haihua. 2001. A constructional analysis of the existential structure. In Pan, Haihua (ed.), Studies in Chinese Linguistics II, 189–208. Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yong, Shin. 1993. The aspectual phenomena of the BA construction. Madison: University of Wisconsin. (PhD dissertation.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Liu, Meichun & Jui-Ching Chang
2018.
Placement Verbs in Chinese and English: Language-Specific Lexicalization Patterns. In
Chinese Lexical Semantics [
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11173],
► pp. 454 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.