Plurality and definiteness in Chengdu Chinese
The authors identify a plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese that can apply to both count and mass nouns, encoding plurality as well as definiteness. This post-nominal -ɕiɛ differs from the pre-nominal ɕiɛ, as the latter is purely plural but not inherently definite. Our analysis shows that the pre-nominal ɕiɛ functions as a quantifier, which occupies the [Spec, NumP] position, whereas the suffixal -ɕiɛ, by virtue of being a plural marker, is base-generated in the Num0 position and move to D0 to encode both plurality and definiteness. Moreover, the two ɕiɛs can co-occur in one and the same nominal phrase, exhibiting the double definiteness effect. The syntactic analysis of ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese, coupled with the study of di in Cantonese, has theoretical impacts on nominal phrase structures, in particular, on “plurality” and “definiteness”. First, plural markers in classifier languages contrast with those in number languages, as the former, but not the latter, defies numerical modification. Second, definiteness can be expressed by a non-D element, which may check its [+def] feature either by undergoing an upward movement to D (or [Spec, DP]) or by agreeing with the [+def] feature of a demonstrative. Third, the DP-NP distinction is strongly supported by our account of Chengdu Chinese.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data presentation
- 2.1The quantifier ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 2.2The plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.Syntactic analysis of ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.1The quantifier ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 3.2The plural marker -ɕiɛ in Chengdu Chinese
- 4.More on plurality: Syntactic analysis of di in Cantonese
- 4.1Data presentation of di
- 4.2Data analysis of di
- 4.3A comparison between di and ɕiɛ
- 5.Theoretical impacts
- 5.1On plurality
- 5.2On definiteness
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References
Acquaviva, Paolo
2008 Lexical plurals: A morphosemantic approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992 A-morphous morphology (
Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Athanasiadou, Ifigeneia & Athanasopoulos, Panos
2017 Plural mass nouns and the construal of individuation: Crosslinguistic evidence from verbal and nonverbal behaviour in labelling and non-labelling contexts.
Cognitive Semantics 3(1). 62–94.
Au Yeung, Wai Hoo
2005 An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bošković, Željko
2005 On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP.
Studia Linguistica 59(1). 1–45.
Bošković, Željko
2008 What will you have, DP or NP? In
Elfner, Emily &
Walkow, Martin (eds.),
NELS 37: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 11, 101–114. Amherst: GLSA.
Chacón, Dustin Alfonso
2011 Head movement in the Bangla DP.
Journal of South Asian Linguistics 4(1). 3–25.
Cheng, L.-S. Lisa & Sybesma, Rint
1999 Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP.
Linguistic Inquiry 30(4). 509–542.
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998 Reference to kinds across languages.
Natural Language Semantics 6(4). 339–405.
Corbett, Greville G.
2000 Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doron, Edit & Müller, Ana
2013 The cognitive basis of the mass-count distinction: Evidence from bare nouns. In
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia &
Zribi-Hertz, Anne (eds.),
Crosslinguistic studies on noun phrase structure and reference, 73–101. Leiden: Brill.
Ghaniabadi, Saeed
2012 Plural marking beyond count nouns. In
Massam, Diane (ed.),
Count and mass across languages, 112–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ghomeshi, Jila
2003 Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase.
Studia Linguistica 57(2). 47–74.
Giusti, Giuliana
1995 A unified structural representation of (abstract) case and article: Evidence from Germanic. In
Haider, Hubert &
Olsen, Susan &
Vikner, Sten (eds.),
Studies in comparative Germanic syntax (
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31), 77–93. Dordrecht: Springer.
Giusti, Giuliana
1997 The categorial status of determiners. In
Haegeman, Liliane (ed.),
The new comparative syntax, 95–123. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Giusti, Giuliana
2015 Nominal syntax at the interfaces: A comparative analysis of languages with articles. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Her, One-Soon
2012a Distinguishing classifiers and measure words: A mathematical perspective and implications.
Lingua 122(14). 1668–1691.
Her, One-Soon
2012b Structure of classifiers and measure words: A lexical functional account.
Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1211–1251.
Heycock, Caroline & Zamparelli, Roberto
2005 Friends and colleagues: Plurality, coordination and the structure of DP.
Natural Language Semantics 13(3). 201–270.
Huang, Chu-Ren & Ahrens, Kathleen
2003 Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns.
Language Sciences 25(4). 353–373.
Iljic, Robert
1994 Quantification in Mandarin Chinese: Two markers of plurality.
Linguistics 32(1). 91–116.
Iljic, Robert
2001 The problem of the suffix -men in Chinese grammar.
Journal of Chinese Linguistics 29(1). 11–68.
Krifka, Manfred
1995 Common nouns: A contrastive analysis of Chinese and English. In
Carlson, Gregory N. &
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (eds.),
The generic book, 398–411. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Krifka, Manfred
2003 Bare NPs: Kind-referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In
Young, Robert B. &
Zhou, Yuping (eds.),
Proceedings of the 13th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT XIII), 180–203. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
1998 Argument determiner phrases and number phrases.
Linguistic Inquiry 29(4). 693–702.
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey
1999 Plurality in a classifier language.
Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8(1). 75–99.
Liao, Wei-wen Roger
2011 The symmetry of syntactic relations. Los Angeles: University of Southern California. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Longobardi, Giuseppe
1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form.
Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 609–665.
Lyons, Christopher
1999 Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, Stephen & Yip, Virginia
2011 Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.
Ojeda, Almerindo E.
2005 The paradox of mass plurals. In
Mufwene, Salikoko S. &
Francis, Elaine J. &
Wheeler, Rebecca S. (eds.),
Polymorphous linguistics: Jim McCawley’s legacy, 389–410. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rijkhoff, Jan
1999 When can a language have adjectives? An implicational universal. In
Vogel, Petra M. &
Comrie, Bernard (eds.),
Approaches to the typology of word classes, 217–257. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Rijkhoff, Jan
2002 The noun phrase. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rothstein, Susan
2017 Semantics for counting and measuring: Key topics in semantics and pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rullmann, Hotze & You, Aili
2006 General number and the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite bare nouns in Mandarin Chinese. In
Von Heusinger, Klaus &
Turner, Ken (eds.),
Where semantics meets pragmatics, 175–196. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Steindl, Ulrike
2010 Grammatical issues in the Chinese classifier system: The case of classifier reduplication. Vienna: Universität Wien. (Master’s thesis.)
Stowell, Tim
1989 Subjects, specifiers and X-bar theory. In
Baltin, Mark R. &
Kroch, Anthony S. (eds.).
Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 232–262. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Stowell, Tim
1991 Determiners in NP and DP. In
Leffel, Katherine &
Bouchard, Denis (eds.),
Views on phrase structure (
Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25), 37–56. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Szabolcsi, Anna
1983 The possessor that ran away from home.
The Linguistic Review 3(1). 89–102.
Szabolcsi, Anna
1992 Combinatory grammar and projection from the lexicon. In
Sag, Ivan A. &
Szabolcsi, Anna (eds.),
Lexical matters (
CSLI Lecture Notes 24), 241–268. Stanford: CSLI.
Szabolcsi, Anna
1994 The noun phrase. In
Kiefer, Ferenc &
Kiss, Katalin E. (eds.),
The syntactic structure of Hungarian (
Syntax and Semantics 27), 179–274. New York: Academic Press.
Tang, Sze-Wing
2001 Nominal predication and focus anchoring. In
Jäger, Gerhard &
Strigin, Anatoli &
Wilder, Chris &
Zhang, Niina (eds.),
Papers on predicative constructions: Proceedings of the Workshop on Secondary Predication (
ZAS Papers in Linguistics 22), 159–172. Berlin: Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
Tsoulas, George
2006 Plurality of mass nouns and the grammar of number. (Paper presented at the 29th GLOW Colloquium, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 6–8 April 2006.)
Tsoulas, George
2009 On the grammar of number and mass terms in Greek. In
Halpert, Clair &
Hartman, Jeremy &
Hill, David (eds.),
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop in Greek Syntax and Semantics at MIT, vol. 571, 333–348. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse & Liu, Xiaoyan
2008 Plurality in Chinese with a restricted class of noun-classifier words. In
Clarke, Sarah &
Hirayama, Manami &
Kim, Kyumin &
Suh, Eugenia (eds.),
Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28: Proceedings of the International Conference on East Asian Linguistics, 357–373. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.
Watanabe, Akira
2017 The mass/count distinction in Japanese from the perspective of partitivity.
Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 1–26. (
Article 98).
Wei, Ting-Chi
2007 Nominal predicates in Mandarin Chinese.
Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 5(2). 85–130.
Yang, Rong
2001 Common nouns, classifiers, and quantification in Chinese. New Brunswick: Rutgers University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Zhang, Niina Ning
2013 Classifier structures in Mandarin Chinese. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Xiong, Jiajuan & Chu-Ren Huang
2020.
QP for indefiniteness: With special reference to Sinhala and Chinese.
Lingua 236
► pp. 102793 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.