Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2021) ► pp.213–242

On the relationship between middles and passives

A polyfunctional analysis of -eci in Contemporary Korean

| Hankuk University of Foreign Studies
| Chinese University of Hong Kong

Previous studies using diachronic data from the Sejong Historical Corpus have traced the semantic extension of voice marker -eci from middle to passive uses (e.g. Ahn & Yap 2017). In this study, based on data from the Sejong Contemporary Spoken Corpus, we further examine the relationship between middle and passive uses of -eci constructions, with special attention to the neutralization of adversative readings that give rise to generalized (in addition to adversative) middle and passive -eci constructions. Our analysis reveals that judgments about adversative readings in Contemporary Korean are not emergent solely from the semantics of the verb or adjective preceding -eci but additionally are emergent and grounded in the interaction between discourse participants. The distributional characteristics of -eci also show a strong interaction between voice and tense-aspect-mood (TAM). There is also some interaction effects from register and text type/genre, particularly in the usage frequency distribution of spontaneous and passive -eci constructions. In addition, contrary to the traditional notion that -eci is essentially a passive marker, in real usage, -eci is still far more frequently used as a middle marker than a passive marker.

Keywords: middle voice, spontaneous, inchoative, facilitative, subjectification, tense-aspect-mood, adversative semantics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Middle and passive uses of Korean -eci
    • 2.1Korean middle marker -eci
    • 2.2Korean passive marker -eci
  • 3.Development of voice marker -eci from adversative to non-adversative contexts
  • 4.Usage frequency of -eci middle and passive constructions
    • 4.1Distribution of tense-aspect marking and voice functions in -eci constructions
    • 4.2Distribution of voice-marking functions of -eci across text types
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Sources
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 17 March 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00081.ahn
References
Ahn, Mikyung & Yap, Foong Ha
2017 From middle to passive: A diachronic analysis of Korean -eci constructions. Diachronica 34(4). 437–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bae, Huyim
1986 ‘-Ci’wa phitong [-Ci and passive]. Seoul: Thap Press.Google Scholar
1988 Kwuke phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean passive]. Seoul: Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University.Google Scholar
Bak, Jae-Yeon
2007 On the modal meanings of auxiliary construction -eoji-. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 501. 269–293.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea S.
2005 Reflexive-middle and reciprocal-middle continua in Romanian. In Mushin, Ilana (ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–13. Sydney: University of Sydney. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-​15.)
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
1999 The English get-passive in spoken discourse: Description and implications for an interpersonal grammar. English Language and Linguistics 3(1). 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
1980 Is the get-passive adversative? Papers in Linguistics 13(3). 411–452. ( Papers in Linguistics is known as Research on Language and Social Interaction since 1987.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, Hyunbae
1961[1937] Wuli malpon [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Cengum Publishing.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo
1989 The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. In Branigan, P. & Gaulding, J. & Kubo, M. & Murasugi, K. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: Proceedings of the 1st Student Conference in Linguistics, 16–30. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006 Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M.
1977 Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas
2006 The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987 Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type (Arbeitspapier, N.F., Nr. 5). Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991 On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume I: Theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Eon-hak
2002 Study on the grammaticalization of the ‘-go isda’ construction. The Chin-Tan Hakpo [The Chin-Tan Society] 941. 167–203.Google Scholar
2006 Sangilonkwa pocoyongenuy yeksacek yenkwu [Historical studies on aspect and auxiliary verbs]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1985 Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume I: Clause structure, 243–281. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Roeper, Thomas
1984 On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 381–416.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha Kyun
1980 Kwukeuy sayekkwa swutonguy uymi [The meaning of causatives and passives in Korean]. Hangeul 1681. 3–47.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1982 Affectiveness and the voice system of Japanese: Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back. In Macaulay, Monica & Gensler, Orin D. & Brugman, Claudia & Civkulis, Inese & Dahlstrom, Amy & Krile, Katherine & Sturm, Rob (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 398–413. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1988 Affectedness and control: A typology of voice systems. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and voice (Typological Studies in Language 16), 25–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, Yŏng-jin
1997 Hankwukeuymwunpephwakwaceng: Phwulissiuykyengwu [Grammaticalization of Korean: In the case of predicates]. Seoul: Kookhak publishing.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009 Spatial reciprocity: Between grammar and lexis. In Helmbrecht, Johannes & Nishina, Yoko & Shin, Yong-Min & Skopeteas, Stavros & Verhoeven, Elisabeth (eds.), Form and function in language research: Papers in honour of Christian Lehmann (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 210), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Tag
2001 “Ci (ti)”- uy thongsicek pyencheney kwanhan yenkwu [On the historical development of -ti-]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 381. 117–136.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968 Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Su-kyong
2011 ‘-Ecita’ uymi kochaley tayhan silon emwun yenkwu [An essay on the meanings of ‘-eojida’: A typological perspective]. Emwun yenkwu [The Society for Korean Language and Literary Research] 39(3). 175–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 2011 The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. ‎Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je
1988 The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions (Typological Studies in Language 12), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William D.
1980 The derived intransitive construction in English. Lingua 52(1–2). 57–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Naoyuki
2013 Event structure and the Japanese indirect passive. In Pustejovsky, James & Bouillon, Pierrette & Isahara, Hitoshi & Kanzaki, Kyoko & Lee, Chungmin (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (Text, Speech and Language Technology 46), 311–326. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oshima, David Y.
2003 Out of control: A unified analysis of Japanese passive constructions. In Kim, Jong-Bok & Wechsler, Stephen (eds.), The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 245–265. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006 Adversity and Korean/Japanese passives: Constructional analogy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2). 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Seong Jong
1984 (A) study on Korean passive. Seoul: Seoul National University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Prasithrathsint, Amara
2006 Development of thùuk passive marker in Thai. In Abraham, Werner & Leisiö, Larisa (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function (Typological Studies in Language 68), 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seng, Kwangswu
1976 Kwuke kancepphitongey tayhaye [About indirect passive in Korean]. Mwunpepyenkwu [Studies on grammar] 31. 159–182.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985 Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives, and adversative passives. In Gahl, Susanne & Dolbey, Andy & Johnson, Christopher (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session, dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 461–486. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 31, 57–149. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989 On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 1991 Introduction. Approaches to grammaticalization, volume II: Types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:2), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valfells, Sigridur
1970 Middle voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics 1, 551–572. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar
Winskel, Heather & Padakannaya, Prakash
(eds.) 2014 South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woo, Inhyey
1997 Wulimal phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean Passives]. Seoul: Hankook Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jae-Hoon
1994 Grammatical relation changing constructions in Korean: A functional-typological study. London: University of London. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar