Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 22:2 (2021) ► pp.213242
Ahn, Mikyung & Yap, Foong Ha
Bae, Huyim
1986‘-Ci’wa phitong [-Ci and passive]. Seoul: Thap Press.Google Scholar
1988Kwuke phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean passive]. Seoul: Research Institute of Korean Studies, Korea University.Google Scholar
Bak, Jae-Yeon
2007On the modal meanings of auxiliary construction -eoji-. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 501. 269–293.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Calude, Andreea S.
2005Reflexive-middle and reciprocal-middle continua in Romanian. In Mushin, Ilana (ed.), Proceedings of the 2004 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 1–13. Sydney: University of Sydney. ([URL]) (Accessed 2020-05-​15.)
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael
1999The English get-passive in spoken discourse: Description and implications for an interpersonal grammar. English Language and Linguistics 3(1). 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chappell, Hilary
1980Is the get-passive adversative? Papers in Linguistics 13(3). 411–452. ( Papers in Linguistics is known as Research on Language and Social Interaction since 1987.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, Hyunbae
1961[1937]Wuli malpon [Korean grammar]. Seoul: Cengum Publishing.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo
1989The middle: Where semantics and morphology meet. In Branigan, P. & Gaulding, J. & Kubo, M. & Murasugi, K. (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: Proceedings of the 1st Student Conference in Linguistics, 16–30. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faltz, Leonard M.
1977Reflexivization: A study in universal syntax. Berkeley: University of California. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Fleisher, Nicholas
2006The origin of passive get . English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987Transitivity alternations of the anticausative type (Arbeitspapier, N.F., Nr. 5). Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, volume I: Theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Eon-hak
2002Study on the grammaticalization of the ‘-go isda’ construction. The Chin-Tan Hakpo [The Chin-Tan Society] 941. 167–203.Google Scholar
2006Sangilonkwa pocoyongenuy yeksacek yenkwu [Historical studies on aspect and auxiliary verbs]. Seoul: Thayhaksa.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1985Passive in the world’s languages. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, volume I: Clause structure, 243–281. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993The middle voice (Typological Studies in Language 23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keyser, Samuel Jay & Roeper, Thomas
1984On the middle and ergative constructions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 15(3). 381–416.Google Scholar
Kim, Cha Kyun
1980 Kwukeuy sayekkwa swutonguy uymi [The meaning of causatives and passives in Korean]. Hangeul 1681. 3–47.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1982Affectiveness and the voice system of Japanese: Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back. In Macaulay, Monica & Gensler, Orin D. & Brugman, Claudia & Civkulis, Inese & Dahlstrom, Amy & Krile, Katherine & Sturm, Rob (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 398–413. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
1988Affectedness and control: A typology of voice systems. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Passive and voice (Typological Studies in Language 16), 25–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ko, Yŏng-jin
1997Hankwukeuymwunpephwakwaceng: Phwulissiuykyengwu [Grammaticalization of Korean: In the case of predicates]. Seoul: Kookhak publishing.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2009Spatial reciprocity: Between grammar and lexis. In Helmbrecht, Johannes & Nishina, Yoko & Shin, Yong-Min & Skopeteas, Stavros & Verhoeven, Elisabeth (eds.), Form and function in language research: Papers in honour of Christian Lehmann (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 210), 57–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lee, Jung Tag
2001 “Ci (ti)”- uy thongsicek pyencheney kwanhan yenkwu [On the historical development of -ti-]. Kwukehak [Journal of Korean Linguistics] 381. 117–136.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1968Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nam, Su-kyong
2011 ‘-Ecita’ uymi kochaley tayhan silon emwun yenkwu [An essay on the meanings of ‘-eojida’: A typological perspective]. Emwun yenkwu [The Society for Korean Language and Literary Research] 39(3). 175–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 2011The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. ‎Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jaxontov, Sergej Je
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. (ed.), Typology of resultative constructions (Typological Studies in Language 12), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William D.
1980The derived intransitive construction in English. Lingua 52(1–2). 57–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Naoyuki
2013Event structure and the Japanese indirect passive. In Pustejovsky, James & Bouillon, Pierrette & Isahara, Hitoshi & Kanzaki, Kyoko & Lee, Chungmin (eds.), Advances in generative lexicon theory (Text, Speech and Language Technology 46), 311–326. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oshima, David Y.
2003Out of control: A unified analysis of Japanese passive constructions. In Kim, Jong-Bok & Wechsler, Stephen (eds.), The Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 245–265. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
2006Adversity and Korean/Japanese passives: Constructional analogy. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2). 137–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Seong Jong
1984(A) study on Korean passive. Seoul: Seoul National University. (Master’s thesis.)Google Scholar
Prasithrathsint, Amara
2006Development of thùuk passive marker in Thai. In Abraham, Werner & Leisiö, Larisa (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function (Typological Studies in Language 68), 115–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seng, Kwangswu
1976 Kwuke kancepphitongey tayhaye [About indirect passive in Korean]. Mwunpepyenkwu [Studies on grammar] 31. 159–182.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In Shibatani, Masayoshi (ed.), Syntax and semantics 6: The grammar of causative constructions, 1–40. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985Passives and related constructions: A prototype analysis. Language 61(4). 821–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994An integrational approach to possessor raising, ethical datives, and adversative passives. In Gahl, Susanne & Dolbey, Andy & Johnson, Christopher (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session, dedicated to the contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 461–486. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 31, 57–149. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1989On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1). 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Stein, Dieter & Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds.) 1991Introduction. Approaches to grammaticalization, volume II: Types of grammatical markers (Typological Studies in Language 19:2), 1–14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valfells, Sigridur
1970Middle voice in Icelandic. In Benediktsson, Hreinn (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics 1, 551–572. Reykjavík: Vísindafélag Íslendinga.Google Scholar
Winskel, Heather & Padakannaya, Prakash
(eds.) 2014South and Southeast Asian psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Woo, Inhyey
1997Wulimal phitong yenkwu [Studies on Korean Passives]. Seoul: Hankook Publishing House.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jae-Hoon
1994Grammatical relation changing constructions in Korean: A functional-typological study. London: University of London. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar