Chinese idioms as constructions
Frequency, semantic transparency and their processing
Chinese Quadrisyllabic Idiomatic Expressions (henceforth QIEs) are highly productive in the modern language. They
can be used to understand the cognitive processing of structure and meaning during reading comprehension, as in the patterning of
[qian-A-wan-B] ‘1k-A-10k-B’ (e.g. one-thousand army ten-thousand horse). However, little is known about the
underlying mechanisms of QIEs during reading comprehension. Adopting the framework of Construction Grammar, in the present study,
we aimed to study the convergence and divergence between native speakers and L2 learners in the processing of Chinese idiomatic
constructions.
In the present study, twenty-three native university-level Mandarin speakers and twenty-three L2 learners of
intermediate and advanced levels of Mandarin, all speakers of the non Sinosphere, participated in the experiment, and were
instructed to make a semantic congruency judgment during the presentation of a QIE. Our results showed that, for both native
speakers and L2 learners, semantically transparent idiomatic constructions elicited much shorter RTs than semantically opaque
idiomatic constructions. Our behavioral results also showed that native speakers processed low frequency QIEs faster than high
frequency ones, implying semantic satiation to impede the interpretation of high frequency idioms. For L2 learners, it was
semantic transparency, rather than frequency, that played a more prominent role in idiom processing.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Critical factors contributing to idiom processing
- 2.2Cognitive linguistics and Construction Grammar (CG)
- 2.3The definition of Chinese idioms and their linguistic features
- 2.4L2 acquisition of idioms
- 2.5The current study
- 3.Materials and methods
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials
- 3.3Experimental task and procedure
- 3.4Results
- 3.4.1Accuracy rates
- 3.4.2Reaction times
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References
Ahrens, Kathleen
1995 The
mental representation of verbs. San Diego: University of California at San Diego. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bassett, M. F. & Warne, C. J.
1919 On
the lapse of verbal meaning with repetition.
The American Journal of
Psychology 30(4). 415–418.
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan I.
(eds.) 1994 Relating
events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental
study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Boers, F. & Demecheleer, M.
2001 Measuring
the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms.
ELT
Journal 55(3). 255–262.
Bybee, Joan L.
2006 From usage to grammar: The
mind’s response to
repetition.
Language 82(4). 711–733.
Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J.
Bybee, Joan L. & Thompson, Sandra
2000 Three
frequency effects in syntax. In
Juge, Matthew L. &
Moxley, Jeri L. (eds.),
Proceedings of the
Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14–17 February 1997: General session and parasession on
pragmatics and grammatical structure (BLS
23), 378–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Cacciari, Cristina & Glucksberg, Sam
1994 Understanding
figurative language. In
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (ed.),
Handbook of
psycholinguistics, 447–477. San Diego: Academic Press.
Cacciari, Cristina & Tabossi, Patrizia
1988 The
comprehension of idioms.
Journal of Memory and
Language 27(6). 668–683.
Chen, Changlai
2012 Xiandai Hanyu leiguding duanyu yanjiu [
Quasi-fixed structures in
Modern Mandarin]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1994 Guidelines, criteria, and rules
of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in
psychology.
Psychological
Assessment 6(4). 284–290.
Cieślicka, Anna
2006 Literal
salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners.
Second
Language
Research 22(2). 115–144.
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004 Cognitive
linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cronk, Brian C. & Lima, Susan D. & Schweigert, Wendy A.
1993 Idioms in sentences:
Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity.
Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 22(1). 59–82.
Ellis, Nick C.
2002 Frequency effects in language
processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language
acquisition.
Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 24(2). 143–188.
Ellis, Nick C.
2006 Selective attention and transfer
phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual
learning.
Applied
Linguistics 27(2). 164–194.
Ellis, Nick C.
2013 Construction grammar and second
language acquisition. In
Hoffmann, Thomas &
Trousdale, Graeme (eds.),
The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar, 365–378. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, Nick C. & Laporte, Nadine
1997 Contexts
of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language
acquisition. In
de Groot, Annette M. B. &
Kroll, Judith F. (eds.),
Tutorials in bilingualism:
Psycholinguistic
perspectives, 53–83. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul & O’ Conner, Mary Catherine
1988 Regularity and
idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let
alone
.
Language 64(3). 501–538.
Fitzpatrick, Tess & Wray, Alison
2006 Breaking
up is not so hard to do: Individual differences in L2 memorization.
The Canadian Modern
Language
Review 63(1). 35–56.
Galmar, Bruno
2012 An
investigation of the nature of verbal satiation in
Chinese. Tainan: National Cheng Kung University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. & Nayak, Nandini P. & Cutting, Cooper
1989 How
to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing.
Journal of Memory and
Language 28(5). 576–593.
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer
1999 On
understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language.
Journal of
Pragmatics 31(12). 1601–1618.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1992 The inherent semantics of
argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction.
Cognitive
Linguistics 3(1). 37–74.
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995 Constructions: A construction grammar
approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele E. & Casenhiser, Devin M. & Sethuraman, Nitya
2005 The
role of prediction in construction-learning.
Journal of Child
Language 32(2). 407–426.
Hovav, Malka Rappaport & Levin, Beth
2008 The
English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity.
Journal of
Linguistics 44(1). 129–167.
Hu, Ying-Hsueh & Fong, Yu-Ying
2010 Obstacles
to CM-guided L2 idiom interpretation. In
De Knop, Sabine &
Boers, Frank &
De Rycker, Antoon (eds.),
Fostering
language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (
Applications of Cognitive Linguistics
(ACL)
17), 293–316. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Jakobovits, Leon A.
1962 Effects of repeated stimulation
on cognitive aspects of behavior: Some experiments on the phenomenon of semantic
satiation. Montreal: McGill University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Jakobovits, Leon A. & Lambert, Wallace E.
1962 Semantic satiation in an
addition task.
Canadian Journal of
Experimental Psychology 16(2). 112–119.
Kaschak, Michael P. & Glenberg, Arthur M.
2000 Constructing meaning:
The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension.
Journal of
Memory and
Language 43(3). 508–529.
Liu, Shuxin
1990 Hanyu miaoxie cihuixue [
Chinese descriptive
lexicology]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Liu, Te-hsin & Lu, Chiarung & Tsai, I-ni & Su, I-wen
2017 Idiomaticity
and regularity of Chinese four-character idioms: The case of
[yi-X-#-Y]. (Paper presented at the 29th North
American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-29), Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, 16–18 June 2017.)
Liu, Yuehua
2005 Chengyu yu duiwai Hanyu jiaoxue [Idiomatic expressions and
teaching Chinese as a foreign language]. In
Teng, Shou-hsin (ed.),
Ershiyi shiji Huayu jigou yingyun celue yu jiaoxue guoji yantaohui lunwenji [
Proceedings for the 2005 International Symposium on Operational Strategies and Pedagogy for Chinese Language
Programs in the 21st
Century], 298–303. Taipei: Mandarin Training Center, National Taiwan Normal University.
Lu, L. & Liu, H.-H.
1998[1994] Xiuding Bi-Pao-De tuhua chihui ceyan [
Peabody picture vocabulary
test – revised]. Taipei: Psychological Publishing. (
Mandarin Chinese version, an earlier version is published in
1994.)
McGraw, Kenneth O. & Wong, S. P.
1996 Forming
inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
Psychological
Methods 1(1). 30–46.
Meyer, Charles F. & Grabowski, Roger & Han, Hung-Yul & Mantzouranis, Konstantin & Moses, Stephanie
2003 The
world wide web as linguistic corpus. In
Leistyna, Pepi &
Meyer, Charles F. (eds.),
Corpus analysis: Language
structure and language use (
Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics
46), 241–254. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Moon, Rosamund
1998 Fixed
expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nunberg, Geoffrey & Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas
1994 Idioms.
Language 70(3). 491–538.
Pinker, Steven
1989 Learnability
and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Plag, Ingo
2003 Word-formation
in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, Walter & Eschman, Amy & Zuccolotto, Anthony
2002 E-prime
user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Schweigert, Wendy A.
1991 The muddy waters of idiom
comprehension.
Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 20(4). 305–314.
Severance, Elizabeth & Washburn, Margaret Floy
1907 The loss of
associative power in words after long fixation.
The American Journal of
Psychology 18(2). 182–186.
Skoufaki, Sophia
2008 Investigating
the source of idiom transparency intuitions.
Metaphor and
Symbol 24(1). 20–41.
Su, Lily I-Wen
2002 Why a construction – That is
the question! Concentric: Studies in
Linguistics 28(2). 27–42.
Swinney, David A. & Cutler, Anne
1979 The
access and processing of idiomatic expressions.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior 18(5). 523–534.
Tabossi, Patrizia & Fanari, Rachele & Wolf, Kinou
2009 Why
are idioms recognized fast? Memory &
Cognition 37(4). 529–540.
Tsou, Benjamin K.
2012 Idiomaticity and classical
traditions in some East Asian languages. In
Manurung, Ruli &
Bond, Francis (eds.),
Proceedings
of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC
26), 39–55. Depok: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia.
Wang, Li
1990 Idiom
and classical illusion. In
Wang, Li (ed.),
Wang Li wenji [
Collection of Wang
Li], vol. 111, 653–672. Jinan: Shandong Educational Press.
Wang, Ruojiang
2001 Liuxuesheng chengyu pian wu youyin fenxi-cidian pian [Analysis
of idiom errors made by foreign students].
Jinan daxue Huawen xueyuan
xuebao [
TCSOL Studies: Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan
University] 2001(3). 28–35.
Wray, Alison
2002 Formulaic
language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Xu, Sheng-huan
2006 Proximity
and complementation: Studies of the formation mechanism of idioms from cognitive point of view
(II).
Jinan daxue Huawen xueyuan xuebao [
TCSOL Studies: Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan
University] 2016(3). 33–41.
Yang, Jie & Li, Ping & Fang, Xiaoping & Shu, Hua & Liu, Youyi & Chen, Lang
2016 Hemispheric
involvement in the processing of Chinese idioms: An fMRI
study.
Neuropsychologia 871. 12–24.
Zhang, Hui & Yang, Yiming & Gu, Jiexin & Ji, Feng
2013 ERP
correlates of compositionality in Chinese idiom comprehension.
Journal of
Neurolinguistics 26(1). 89–112.
Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong
2003 CCL yuliaoku jiansuo xitong [
The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700
million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century
B.C.–present]. Beijing: Center for Chinese Linguistics, Peking University. (
[URL]) (Accessed 2021-03-15.)
Zwitserlood, Pienie
1994 The
role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds.
Language
and Cognitive
Processes 9(3). 341–368. (
Language
and Cognitive Processes is currently known as Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience
.)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Li, Liu
2023.
Introduction. In
Quadri-syllabic Schematic Idioms in Chinese: Description and Acquisition,
► pp. 1 ff.
Liu, Te-Hsin, Chia-Ho Lai & Tai-Li Chou
2023.
The neurocognitive basis of Chinese idiomatic constructions and processing differences between native speakers and L2 learners of Mandarin.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
Sidorova, Ayta Anatolievna & Sargylana Vasilievna Filippova
2023.
The somatic code “head” in Chinese phraseology.
Philology. Theory & Practice 16:8
► pp. 2838 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.