Chinese idioms as constructions
Frequency, semantic transparency and their processing
Chinese Quadrisyllabic Idiomatic Expressions (henceforth QIEs) are highly productive in the modern language. They
can be used to understand the cognitive processing of structure and meaning during reading comprehension, as in the patterning of
[qian-A-wan-B] ‘1k-A-10k-B’ (e.g. one-thousand army ten-thousand horse). However, little is known about the
underlying mechanisms of QIEs during reading comprehension. Adopting the framework of Construction Grammar, in the present study,
we aimed to study the convergence and divergence between native speakers and L2 learners in the processing of Chinese idiomatic
constructions.
In the present study, twenty-three native university-level Mandarin speakers and twenty-three L2 learners of
intermediate and advanced levels of Mandarin, all speakers of the non Sinosphere, participated in the experiment, and were
instructed to make a semantic congruency judgment during the presentation of a QIE. Our results showed that, for both native
speakers and L2 learners, semantically transparent idiomatic constructions elicited much shorter RTs than semantically opaque
idiomatic constructions. Our behavioral results also showed that native speakers processed low frequency QIEs faster than high
frequency ones, implying semantic satiation to impede the interpretation of high frequency idioms. For L2 learners, it was
semantic transparency, rather than frequency, that played a more prominent role in idiom processing.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Critical factors contributing to idiom processing
- 2.2Cognitive linguistics and Construction Grammar (CG)
- 2.3The definition of Chinese idioms and their linguistic features
- 2.4L2 acquisition of idioms
- 2.5The current study
- 3.Materials and methods
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Materials
- 3.3Experimental task and procedure
- 3.4Results
- 3.4.1Accuracy rates
- 3.4.2Reaction times
- 4.Discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Abbreviations
-
References
References (58)
References
Ahrens, Kathleen. 1995. The
mental representation of verbs. San Diego: University of California at San Diego. (Doctoral dissertation.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bassett, M. F. & Warne, C. J. 1919. On
the lapse of verbal meaning with repetition. The American Journal of
Psychology 30(4). 415–418. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, Ruth A. & Slobin, Dan I. (eds.). 1994. Relating
events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental
study. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boers, F. & Demecheleer, M. 2001. Measuring
the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms. ELT
Journal 55(3). 255–262. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The
mind’s response to
repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. & Thompson, Sandra. 2000. Three
frequency effects in syntax. In Juge, Matthew L. & Moxley, Jeri L. (eds.), Proceedings of the
Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 14–17 February 1997: General session and parasession on
pragmatics and grammatical structure (BLS
23), 378–388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cacciari, Cristina & Glucksberg, Sam. 1994. Understanding
figurative language. In Gernsbacher, Morton Ann (ed.), Handbook of
psycholinguistics, 447–477. San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cacciari, Cristina & Tabossi, Patrizia. 1988. The
comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and
Language 27(6). 668–683. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Changlai. 2012. Xiandai Hanyu leiguding duanyu yanjiu [Quasi-fixed structures in
Modern Mandarin]. Shanghai: Xuelin Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cicchetti, Domenic V. 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules
of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in
psychology. Psychological
Assessment 6(4). 284–290. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cieślicka, Anna. 2006. Literal
salience in on-line processing of idiomatic expressions by second language learners. Second
Language
Research 22(2). 115–144. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan. 2004. Cognitive
linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cronk, Brian C. & Lima, Susan D. & Schweigert, Wendy A. 1993. Idioms in sentences:
Effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 22(1). 59–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, Nick C. 2002. Frequency effects in language
processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language
acquisition. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition 24(2). 143–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, Nick C. 2006. Selective attention and transfer
phenomena in L2 acquisition: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual
learning. Applied
Linguistics 27(2). 164–194. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, Nick C. 2013. Construction grammar and second
language acquisition. In Hoffmann, Thomas & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The
Oxford handbook of construction
grammar, 365–378. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellis, Nick C. & Laporte, Nadine. 1997. Contexts
of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language
acquisition. In de Groot, Annette M. B. & Kroll, Judith F. (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism:
Psycholinguistic
perspectives, 53–83. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul & O’ Conner, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and
idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let
alone
. Language 64(3). 501–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzpatrick, Tess & Wray, Alison. 2006. Breaking
up is not so hard to do: Individual differences in L2 memorization. The Canadian Modern
Language
Review 63(1). 35–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Galmar, Bruno. 2012. An
investigation of the nature of verbal satiation in
Chinese. Tainan: National Cheng Kung University. (Doctoral dissertation.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr. & Nayak, Nandini P. & Cutting, Cooper. 1989. How
to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and
Language 28(5). 576–593. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giora, Rachel & Fein, Ofer. 1999. On
understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of
Pragmatics 31(12). 1601–1618. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1992. The inherent semantics of
argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction. Cognitive
Linguistics 3(1). 37–74. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar
approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. & Casenhiser, Devin M. & Sethuraman, Nitya. 2005. The
role of prediction in construction-learning. Journal of Child
Language 32(2). 407–426. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hovav, Malka Rappaport & Levin, Beth. 2008. The
English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of
Linguistics 44(1). 129–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Ying-Hsueh & Fong, Yu-Ying. 2010. Obstacles
to CM-guided L2 idiom interpretation. In De Knop, Sabine & Boers, Frank & De Rycker, Antoon (eds.), Fostering
language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics
(ACL)
17), 293–316. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobovits, Leon A. 1962. Effects of repeated stimulation
on cognitive aspects of behavior: Some experiments on the phenomenon of semantic
satiation. Montreal: McGill University. (Doctoral dissertation.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jakobovits, Leon A. & Lambert, Wallace E. 1962. Semantic satiation in an
addition task. Canadian Journal of
Experimental Psychology 16(2). 112–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaschak, Michael P. & Glenberg, Arthur M. 2000. Constructing meaning:
The role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of
Memory and
Language 43(3). 508–529. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Shuxin. 1990. Hanyu miaoxie cihuixue [Chinese descriptive
lexicology]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Te-hsin & Lu, Chiarung & Tsai, I-ni & Su, I-wen. 2017. Idiomaticity
and regularity of Chinese four-character idioms: The case of
[yi-X-#-Y]. (Paper presented at the 29th North
American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-29), Rutgers University, New
Brunswick, 16–18 June 2017.)
Liu, Yuehua. 2005. Chengyu yu duiwai Hanyu jiaoxue [Idiomatic expressions and
teaching Chinese as a foreign language]. In Teng, Shou-hsin (ed.), Ershiyi shiji Huayu jigou yingyun celue yu jiaoxue guoji yantaohui lunwenji [Proceedings for the 2005 International Symposium on Operational Strategies and Pedagogy for Chinese Language
Programs in the 21st
Century], 298–303. Taipei: Mandarin Training Center, National Taiwan Normal University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lu, L. & Liu, H.-H. 1998[1994]. Xiuding Bi-Pao-De tuhua chihui ceyan [Peabody picture vocabulary
test – revised]. Taipei: Psychological Publishing. (Mandarin Chinese version, an earlier version is published in
1994.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGraw, Kenneth O. & Wong, S. P. 1996. Forming
inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological
Methods 1(1). 30–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meyer, Charles F. & Grabowski, Roger & Han, Hung-Yul & Mantzouranis, Konstantin & Moses, Stephanie. 2003. The
world wide web as linguistic corpus. In Leistyna, Pepi & Meyer, Charles F. (eds.), Corpus analysis: Language
structure and language use (Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics
46), 241–254. Amsterdam: Rodopi. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed
expressions and idioms in English: A corpus-based approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nunberg, Geoffrey & Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas. 1994. Idioms. Language 70(3). 491–538. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven. 1989. Learnability
and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-formation
in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schneider, Walter & Eschman, Amy & Zuccolotto, Anthony. 2002. E-prime
user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schweigert, Wendy A. 1991. The muddy waters of idiom
comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research 20(4). 305–314. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Severance, Elizabeth & Washburn, Margaret Floy. 1907. The loss of
associative power in words after long fixation. The American Journal of
Psychology 18(2). 182–186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skoufaki, Sophia. 2008. Investigating
the source of idiom transparency intuitions. Metaphor and
Symbol 24(1). 20–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Su, Lily I-Wen. 2002. Why a construction – That is
the question! Concentric: Studies in
Linguistics 28(2). 27–42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Swinney, David A. & Cutler, Anne. 1979. The
access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior 18(5). 523–534. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabossi, Patrizia & Fanari, Rachele & Wolf, Kinou. 2009. Why
are idioms recognized fast? Memory &
Cognition 37(4). 529–540. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsou, Benjamin K. 2012. Idiomaticity and classical
traditions in some East Asian languages. In Manurung, Ruli & Bond, Francis (eds.), Proceedings
of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC
26), 39–55. Depok: Faculty of Computer Science, Universitas Indonesia.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Li. 1990. Idiom
and classical illusion. In Wang, Li (ed.), Wang Li wenji [Collection of Wang
Li], vol. 111, 653–672. Jinan: Shandong Educational Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Ruojiang. 2001. Liuxuesheng chengyu pian wu youyin fenxi-cidian pian [Analysis
of idiom errors made by foreign students]. Jinan daxue Huawen xueyuan
xuebao [TCSOL Studies: Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan
University] 2001(3). 28–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic
language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Sheng-huan. 2006. Proximity
and complementation: Studies of the formation mechanism of idioms from cognitive point of view
(II). Jinan daxue Huawen xueyuan xuebao [TCSOL Studies: Journal of College of Chinese Language and Culture of Jinan
University] 2016(3). 33–41.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Jie & Li, Ping & Fang, Xiaoping & Shu, Hua & Liu, Youyi & Chen, Lang. 2016. Hemispheric
involvement in the processing of Chinese idioms: An fMRI
study. Neuropsychologia 871. 12–24. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhang, Hui & Yang, Yiming & Gu, Jiexin & Ji, Feng. 2013. ERP
correlates of compositionality in Chinese idiom comprehension. Journal of
Neurolinguistics 26(1). 89–112. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhan, Weidong & Guo, Rui & Chen, Yirong. 2003. CCL yuliaoku jiansuo xitong [The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700
million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century
B.C.–present]. Beijing: Center for Chinese Linguistics, Peking University. ([URL]) (Accessed 2021-03-15.)
Zwitserlood, Pienie. 1994. The
role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language
and Cognitive
Processes 9(3). 341–368. (
Language
and Cognitive Processes is currently known as Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience
.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Li, Liu
2023.
Introduction. In
Quadri-syllabic Schematic Idioms in Chinese: Description and Acquisition,
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Liu, Te-Hsin, Chia-Ho Lai & Tai-Li Chou
2023.
The neurocognitive basis of Chinese idiomatic constructions and processing differences between native speakers and L2 learners of Mandarin.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Sidorova, Ayta Anatolievna & Sargylana Vasilievna Filippova
2023.
The somatic code “head” in Chinese phraseology.
Philology. Theory & Practice 16:8
► pp. 2838 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.