Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 23:2 (2022) ► pp.313–328

Tangut uvularization and the devil in the Chinese details

 | Christopher Newport University
I critique traditional simplex approaches to Tangut Grade by primary reference to Xun Gong’s new suggestion that Grade I/II syllables were contrastively uvularized. Such proposals are rooted in the categories of philological Middle Chinese (MC), but the Grades are at the same time incommensurate with MC in reflecting the effects of apicalization, labiodentalization, and other changes affecting vocalism across northern late medieval Chinese languages (NLMC). Attention to these details suggests that Tangut Grade concerned vowel quality per se, not simplex diagnostic segments or features. Gong’s correspondence between Tangut Grade I/II K- and Rgyalrong Q- also has parallels in NLMC and will require a narrower solution within proposed Qiangic.
Keywords: Tangut, uvularization, grade, division, rank
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A view from northern late medieval Chinese languages
  • 3.Discussion
    • 3.1“Rank” and “Division”
    • 3.2Tangut /K-/ as Grade I/II [Q-] vs. Grade III [K-]
    • 3.3Old Chinese Type A “pharyngealized” onsets
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 29 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00107.smi
References (53)
References
Baxter, William H. 1992. A handbook of Old Chinese phonology (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 64). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Sagart, Laurent. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branner, David Prager. 2006. Simon Schaank and the evolution of Western beliefs about traditional Chinese phonology. In Branner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 151–167. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, Abraham. 2004. Early Middle Chinese: Towards a new paradigm. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 90(1). 122–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1941. Distinctions within Ancient Chinese. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 5(3-4). 203–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coblin, W. South. 1990. Notes on Sanghabhara’s Mahamayuri transcriptions. Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 19(2). 195–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991a. Studies in Old Northwest Chinese (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 4). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)Google Scholar
. 1991b. Thoughts on dentilabialization in the Tang-time dialects of Shazhou. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 77(1). 88–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. A compendium of phonetics in northwest Chinese. (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 7). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)Google Scholar
. 1999. Thoughts on the identity of the Chinese ’Phags-pa dialect. In Simmons, Richard VanNess (ed.), Issues in Chinese dialect description and classification (Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 15), 84–144. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press. (Published on behalf of Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California, Berkeley.)Google Scholar
. 2000a. A diachronic study of Míng Guānhuà phonology. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies 48(1). 267–335. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000b. A brief history of Mandarin. Journal of the American Oriental Society 120(4). 537–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000c. Late apicalization in Nankingese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28(1). 52–66.Google Scholar
. 2001. ’Phags-pa Chinese and the standard reading pronunciation of Early Míng: A comparative study. Language & Linguistics 2(2). 1–62.Google Scholar
. 2007. A handbook of ’Phags-pa Chinese (ABC Chinese Dictionary Series). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Csongor, B. 1952. Chinese in the Uighur script of the T’ang period. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae [An International Journal of Oriental Studies] 2(1). 73–121.Google Scholar
1962. Chinese glosses in Uighur texts written in Brahmi. Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae [An International Journal of Oriental Studies] 15(1). 49–53.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng. 1994. A hypothesis of three grades and vowel length distinction in Tangut. Ajia Afurika gengo bunka kenkyū [Journal of Asian and African Studies] (46-47). 305–314.Google Scholar
. 2002. Shi’er shijimo Hanyu xibei fangyin yunmu xitong de gouni [Reconstruction of the syllable finals system of late 12th century northwestern Chinese]. Han-Zangyu yanjiu lunwenji [Collected papers on Sino-Tibetan linguistics] (Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C2-2), 331–377. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (Preparatory Office), Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Gong, Xun. 2020. Uvulars and uvularization in Tangut phonology. Language & Linguistics 21(2). 175–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume. 2007. Textes tangoutes I: Nouveau recueil sur l’amour parental et la piété filiale (Languages of the World. Text Collections 25). Munich: Lincom Europa. ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-05-01.)
. 2014. Esquisse de phonologie et de morphologie historique du tangoute [A sketch of the historical phonology and morphology of Tangut] (The Languages of Asia Series 12). Leiden: Global Oriental. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard. 1915. Études sur la phonologie Chinoise [Studies on Chinese phonology], vol. 11. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 1922. The reconstruction of Ancient Chinese. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 21(1). 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lau, D. C. & Ho, Che Wah & Chen, Fong Ching. 2000. Zhuangzi zhuzi suoyin [A concordance to the Zhuangzi] (The ICS Ancient Chinese Texts Concordance Series: Philosophical works 43). Hong Kong: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei. 1971. Shangguyin yanjiu [Studies on archaic Chinese phonology]. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 9(1-2). 1–61.Google Scholar
Li, Fanwen. 1997. Xia-Han zidian [Tangut-Chinese dictionary]. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Li, Rong. 1952. Qieyun yinxi [The sound system of the Qieyun ]. Beijng: Chinese Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Maspero, Henri. 1920. Le dialecte de Tch’ang-ngan sous les T’ang [The dialect of Chang’an duing the Tang]. Bulletin de l’École française d’Extrême-Orient [Bulletin of the French School of the Far East] 20(2). 1–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyake, Marc Hideo. 2012. Complexity from compression: A sketch of Pre-Tangut. In Popova, Irina (ed.), Тангуты в Центральной Азии: Cборник статей в честь 80-летия профессора Е. И. Кычанова [Tanguts in Central Asia: A collection of articles marking the 80th birthday of Professor E. I. Kychanov], 244–261. Moscow: Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
. 2015. Grading Tangut rhymes: An exercise in futility? (Presentation at the Tangut Studies Workshop, Centre for the Study of Manuscript Cultures, University of Hamburg, 14 December 2015.) ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-05-01.)
Norman, Jerry. 1994. Pharyngealization in early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114(3). 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Modern Chinese and the rime tables. In Branner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 183–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peng, Xiang-qian. 2012. Xixiawen “Mengzi” zhengli yanjiu [Organization and study of the Tangut Mengzi ]. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. 1962. The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Asia Major: New Series 9(1). 58–144.Google Scholar
1965. The transcription of Sanskrit K and KH in Chinese. Asia Major: New Series 11(2). 199–210.Google Scholar
1977–1978. The final consonants of Old Chinese. Monumenta Serica: Journal of Oriental Studies 33(1). 180–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1979. Some examples of colloquial pronunciation from the Southern Liang dynasty. In Bauer, Wolfgang (ed.), Studia Sino-Mongolica: Festschrift für Herbert Franke [Sino-Mongolian Studies: Festschrift for Herbert Franke] (Münchener Ostasiatische Studien [Munich East Asian Studies] 25), 315–328. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
1984. Middle Chinese: A study in historical phonology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
1991. Lexicon of reconstructed pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
1996. Prosody or pharyngealization in Old Chinese? The origin of the distinction between Type A and Type B syllables. Journal of the American Oriental Society 116(1). 105–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaank, S. H. 1897. Ancient Chinese phonetics. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 8(4). 361–377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1897. Ancient Chinese phonetics: II. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 8(5). 457–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1898. Ancient Chinese phonetics: III. T’oung Pao: International Journal of Chinese Studies 9(1). 28–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schuessler, Axel. 2006. The Qièyùn system ‘Divisions’ as the result of vowel warping. In Branner, David Prager (ed.), The Chinese rime tables: Linguistic philosophy and historical-comparative phonology (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 271), 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Ruiqing. 2017. Děng 等 (Division and rank). In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 21, 13–20. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Shen, Zhongwei. 2008. Apicalization and its related changes before and after the Menggu ziyun . Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics 2(2). 15–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takata, Tokio. 1988. Tonkō shiryō ni yoru Chūgokugo shi no kenkyū: 9–10 seiki no Kasei hōgen [The history of Chinese via the Dunhuang materials: Hexi dialects of the 9th and 10th centuries]. Tokyo: Sōbunsha.Google Scholar
The Commercial Press. 1983–1986. Yingyin Wenyuange Siku quanshu [Photographic reprinting of the Wenyuan Pavilion Siku quanshu ]. Taipei: The Commercial Press. (1,5001 vols.)Google Scholar
Vovin, Alexander & McCraw, David. 2011. Old Turkic kinship terms in early Middle Chinese. Türk Dili Araştırmaları Yıllığı Belleten [Annual Bulletin of Turkish Language Studies] 59(1). 105–116.Google Scholar
Weng, Dujian. 1935. Daozang zimu yinde [Combined indexes to the authors and titles of books in two collections of Taoist literature] (Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series 25). Beijing: Yenching University. (Reprinted in 1966, Taipei: Cheng Wen.)Google Scholar
West, Andrew. 2008. Radical index to Li Fanwen’s Tangut dictionary (1997 edition). ([URL]) (Accessed 2019-05-01.)
Zeng, Yunqian. 1927. Qieyun wu sheng wushiyi niu kao [On five sound categories and fifty-one onsets in the Qieyun ]. Dongbei Daxue Xueshu Jikan [Journal of Northeastern University] 1927(1). 14–21.Google Scholar