Article published In:
Language and Linguistics
Vol. 24:3 (2023) ► pp.469501


Büring, Daniel & Križ, Manuel
2013It’s that, and that’s it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites). Semantics and Pragmatics 61. 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byram-Washburn, Mary & Kaiser, Elsi & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
2014The English it-cleft: No need to get exhausted. (Paper presented at the Questions in Discourse Conference, Göttingen, 18–20 September 2014.)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
2008Deconstructing the shì…de construction. The Linguistic Review 25(3–4). 235–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2013Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Elizabeth & Beaver, David
2014Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 31(3). 371–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Destruel, Emilie & Deveaugh-Geiss, Joseph
2018On the interpretation and processing of exhaustivity: Evidence of variation in English and French clefts. Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Destruel, Emilie & Beaver, David & Coppock, Elizabeth
2018Clefts: Quite the contrary! Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21(1). 335–346.Google Scholar
DeVeaugh-Geiss, Joseph & Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar & Boell, Anna-Christina
2015Contradicting (not-)at-issueness in exclusives and clefts: An empirical study. In D’Antonio, Sarah & Moroney, Mary & Little, Carol Rose (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 25 (SALT 25), 373–393. Ithaca: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drenhaus, Heiner & Zimmermann, Malte & Vasishth, Shravan
2011Exhaustiveness effects in clefts are not truth-functional. Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(3). 320–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74(2). 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka
2015In defense of Closeness: focus-sensitive adverb placement in Vietnamese and Mandarin Chinese. Montréal: McGill University. (Manuscript.)Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. A.
1991On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27(2). 405–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 76(4). 891–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998Semantics in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hole, Daniel
2011The deconstruction of shì…de clefts revisited. Lingua 121(11). 1707–1733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horn, Laurence R.
1981Exhaustiveness and the semantics of clefts. In Burke, Victoria & Pustejovsky, James (eds.), NELS 11: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 125–142. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence
2016Information structure and the landscape of (non-)at-issue meaning. In Féry, Caroline & Ishihara, Shinichiro (eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure, 108–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hsu, Yu-Yin
2019Associations between focus constructions and levels of exhaustivity: An experimental investigation of Chinese. PLOS ONE 14(10). e0223502. DOI logo Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James (黃正德)
1988 Shuo shi he you 說「是」和「有」. The Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philosophy 中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊 59(1). 43–64.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1973Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4(2). 169–193.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri & Peters, Stanley
1979Conventional implicature. In Oh, Choon-Kyu & Dinneen, David A. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István
2006Focus as identification. In Molnár, Valéria & Winkler, Susanne (eds.), The architecture of focus, 137–168. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2008Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55(3–4). 243–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Križ, Manuel & Chemla, Emmanuel
2015Two methods to find truth-value gaps and their application to the projection problem of homogeneity. Natural Language Semantics 23(3). 205–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 39(3). 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landman, Fred
1991Structures for semantics. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Hui-Chi
2005On Chinese focus and cleft constructions. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Lin, Jo-wang (林若望)
2016 De-construction, modality and counterfactual reasoning 「的」字結構、模態與違實推理. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 2016(2). 131–151.Google Scholar
Link, Godehard
1983The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretic approach. In Bäuerle, Rainer & Schwarze, Christoph & von Stechow, Arnim (eds.), Meaning, use, and interpretation of language, 302–323. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Mingming
2017Varieties of alternatives: Mandarin focus particles. Linguistics and Philosophy 40(1). 61–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Ying & Yang, Yu’an
2017To exhaust, or not to exhaust: An experimental study on Mandarin shi-clefts. In Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka (ed.), Proceedings of GLOW in Asia XI, vol. 21 (MITWPL 85), 103–117. Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Whitman, John
2008 Shi…de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Review 25(3–4). 413–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Percus, Orin
1997Prying open the cleft. In Kusumoto, Kiyomi (eds.), NELS 27: Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 27 1, 337–351. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2016Contrast: Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in grammar. In Féry, Caroline & Ishihara, Shinichiro (eds.), Oxford handbook of information structure, 270–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985Association with focus. Amherst: University of Massachusetts at Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
1992A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1). 75–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, Jiaxuan (沈家煊)
2008Moving what? On emotional movement in Ta shi qunian sheng de haizi 「移位」還是「移情」?——析「他是去年生的孩子」 Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 2008(5). 387–395.Google Scholar
Shyu, Shu-ing
2017Shi … (de) sentences. In Sybesma, Rint & Behr, Wolfgang & Gu, Yueguo & Handel, Zev & Huang, C.-T. James & Myers, James (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics, vol. 41, 40–46. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew & Wu, Zoe Xiu-Zhi
2002From D to T – Determiner incorporation and the creation of tense. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11(2). 169–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin
1979Remarks on the cleft sentences in Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7(1). 101–114.Google Scholar
Dan Velleman, & Beaver, David & Destruel, Emilie & Bumford, Dylan & Onea, Edgar & Coppock, Elizabeth
2012 It-clefts are IT (inquiry terminating) constructions. In Chereches, Anca (ed.), Proceedings of the 22nd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 22), 441–460. Ithaca: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wan, Quan (完權)
2013 De in state-of-affairs sentences 事態句中的「的」. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 2013(1). 51–61.Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong
2004Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua 114(3). 277–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne
1969The verb “to be” in modern Chinese. In Verhaar, John W. M. (ed.), The verb “be” and its synonyms: Part 4 (Foundation of Language Supplementary Series 9), 72–111. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Yulin (袁毓林)
2003On the syntactic and semantic function of de in the sentence final position: From a viewpoint of the modern focus theory 從焦點理論看句尾「的」的句法語義功能. Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文 2003(1). 3–16.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar
2011Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua 121(11). 1651–1670. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & De Veaugh-Geiss, Joseph & Tönnis, Swantje & Onea, Edgar
2020(Non-)exhaustivity in focus partitioning across languages. In Hegedűs, Veronika & Vogel, Irene (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian volume 16: Papers from the 2017 Budapest Conference, 207–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar