References
Adriaans, Frans W. & Kager, René. 2017. Learning novel phonotactics from exposure to continuous speech. Laboratory Phonology 8(1). 1–14. (Article 12.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, Adam. 2009. Feature-based generalization as a source of gradient acceptability. Phonology 26(1). 9–41. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albright, Adam & Hayes, Bruce. 2003. Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Cognition 90(2). 119–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderete, John & Bradshaw, Mark. 2013. Samoan root phonotactics: Digging deeper into the data. Linguistic Discovery 11(1). 1–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderete, John & Finley, Sara. 2016. Gradient vowel harmony in Oceanic. Language and Linguistics 17(6). 769–796.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderete, John & Tupper, Paul. 2018. Connectionist approaches to generative phonology. In Hannahs, S. J. & Bosch, Anna R. K. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonological theory, 360–390. New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alderete, John & Tupper, Paul & Frisch, Stefan A. 2013. Phonological constraint induction in a connectionist network: Learning OCP-place constraints from data. Language Sciences 371. 52–69. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anttila, Arto. 1997. Deriving variation from grammar. In Hinskens, Frans L. & van Hout, Roeland & Wetzels, W. Leo (eds.), Variation, change, and phonological theory, 35–68. Amsterdam: Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anttila, Arto. 2007. Variation and optionality. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 519–536. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aslin, Richard N. & Saffran, Jenny R. & Newport, Elissa L. 1998. Computation of conditional probability statistics by 8-month-old infants. Psychological Science 9(4). 321–324. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aylett, Matthew & Turk, Alice. 2004. The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 47(1). 31–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bailey, Todd M. & Hahn, Ulrike. 2001. Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language 44(4). 568–591. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Michael & Gouskova, Maria. 2016. Surface-oriented generalizations as grammar inference in Russian vowel deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 47(3). 391–425. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Michael & Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew. 2011. The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87(1). 84–125. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckman, Mary Esther & Edwards, Jan. 2010. Generalizing over lexicons to predict consonant mastery. Laboratory Phonology 1(2). 319–343. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benus, Stefan. 2005. Dynamics and transparency in vowel harmony. New York: New York University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Bird, Steven & Klein, Ewan & Loper, Edward. 2009. Natural language processing with Python. Sevastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 531–573. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bod, Rens. 2003. Introduction to elementary probability theory and formal stochastic language theory. In Bod, Rens & Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 11–37. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul. 1998. Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25(2). 217–270. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boersma, Paul & Hayes, Bruce. 2001. Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1). 45–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brent, Michael R. & Cartwright, Timothy A. 1996. Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation. Cognition 61(1-2). 93–125. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. 2000. The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In Barlow, Michael & Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 65–85. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan L. & McClelland, James L. 2005. Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22(2-4). 381–410. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cedergren, Henrietta Cecilia Jonas. 1973. The interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ithaca: Cornell University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cedergren, Henrietta Cecilia Jonas & Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2). 333–355. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chambers, Kyle E. & Onishi, Kristine H. & Fisher, Cynthia. 2003. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition 87(2). B69–B77. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chandlee, Jane & Heinz, Jeffrey. 2017. Computational phonology. In Aronoff, Mark (ed.), Oxford research encylcopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (
) (Accessed 2023-04-21.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1961. Some methodological remarks on generative grammar. Word 17(2). 219–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Miller, George A. 1963. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In Luce, R. Duncan & Bush, Robert R. & Galanter, Eugene (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, vol. 21, 269–321. New York: John Wiley.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. 2016. First language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coetzee, Andries W. & Kawahara, Shigeto. 2013. Frequency biases in phonological variation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1). 47–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe. 2008. Weighted constraints and gradient restrictions on place co-ccurrence in Muna and Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26(2). 289–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coetzee, Andries W. & Pater, Joe. 2011. The place of variation in phonological theory. In Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 401–434. Malden: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2012. Sign and signal: Deriving linguistic generalizations from information utility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2015. Informativity affects consonant duration and deletion rates. Laboratory Phonology 6(2). 243–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2017. Informativity and the actuation of lenition. Language 93(3). 569–597. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cole, Jennifer. 2009. Emergent feature structures: Harmony systems in exemplar models of phonology. Language Sciences 31(2-3). 144–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coleman, John & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1997. Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In Coleman, John (ed.), Computational phonology: Third Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in computational phonology, 49–56. Somerset, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crosswhite, Katherine & Alderete, John & Beasley, Tim & Markman, Vita. 2003. Morphological effects on default stress in novel Russian words. In Garding, Gina & Tsujimura, Mimu (eds.), WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 151–164. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cutler, Anne. 1980. Errors of stress and intonation. In Fromkin, Victoria A. (ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of tongue, ear, pen, and hand, 67–80. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daelemans, Walter & Zavrel, Jakub & van der Sloot, Ko & van den Bosch, Antal. 2002. TiMBL: Tilburg memory-based learner, version 4.2, reference guide (ILK technical report; vol. 01–04). Tilburg: Tilburg University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert. 2013. Variation in the input: A case study of manner class frequencies. Journal of Child Language 40(5). 1091–1122. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert. 2014. What is computational phonology? Loquens 1(1). (
) (Accessed 2023-04-21.) (e004.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert. 2015. Long words in maximum entropy phonotactic grammars. Phonology 32(3). 353–383. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert & Hayes, Bruce & White, James & Garellek, Marc & Davis, Andrea & Norrmann, Ingrid. 2011. Explaining sonority projection effects. Phonology 28(2). 197–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2011. Learning diphone-based segmentation. Cognitive Science 35(1). 119–155. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daland, Robert & Zuraw, Kie. 2018. Loci and locality of informational effects on phonetic implementation. Linguistic Vanguard 4(s2). 1–10. (Article no. 20170045.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell, Gary S. 1986. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review 93(3). 283–321. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dell, Gary S. & Juliano, Cornell & Govindjee, Anita. 1993. Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science 17(2). 149–195. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dinnsen, Daniel A. & Charles-Luce, Jan. 1984. Phonological neutralization, phonetic implementation and individual differences. Journal of Phonetics 12(1). 49–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drager, Katie K. 2011. Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics 39(4). 694–707. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durand, Jacques & Gut, Ulrike & Kristoffersen, Gjert (eds). 2014. The Oxford handbook of corpus phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eddington, David. 2000. Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of language. Language 76(1). 92–109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eddington, David. 2004. Issues in modeling language processing analogically. Lingua 114(7). 849–871. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisner, Jason. 2002. Parameter estimation for probabilistic finite-state transducers. In Isabelle, Pierre & Charniak, Eugene & Lin, Dekang (eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 1–8. Philadelphia: Association for Computational Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernestus, Mirjam. 2011. Gradience and categoricality in phonological theory. In van Oostendorp, Marc & Ewen, Colin J. & Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, volume IV: Phonological interfaces, 2115–2136. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald. 2003. Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language 79(1). 5–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald. 2004. Analogical effects in regular past tense production in Dutch. Linguistics 42(5). 873–903. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald. 2011. Corpora and exemplars in phonology. In Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., 374–400. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, Naomi H. & Griffiths, Thomas L. & Goldwater, Sharon & Morgan, James L. 2013. A role for the developing lexicon in phonetic category acquisition. Psychological Review 120(4). 751–778. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldman, Naomi H. & Griffiths, Thomas L. & Morgan, James L. 2009. Learning phonetic categories by learning a lexicon. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 311. 2208–2213. ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-04-21.)
Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the acquisition of prosodic structure. Leiden: Leiden University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Fikkert, Paula. 2007. Acquiring phonology. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 537–554. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finley, Sara. 2013. Generalization to unfamiliar talkers in artificial language learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20(4). 780–789. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Finley, Sara & Badecker, William. 2007. Towards a substantively biased theory of learning. In Crane, Thera & David, Oana & Fenton, Donna & Haynie, Hannah J. & Katseff, Shira & Lee-Goldman, Russell & Rouvier, Ruth & Yu, Dominic (eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General session and parasession on multilingualism and fieldwork, 142–153. Berkeley & Washington, D.C.: Berkeley Linguistics Society & Linguistic Society of America. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Flemming, Edward. 2010. Modeling listeners: Comments on Pluymaekers et al. and Scarborough. In Fougeron, Cécile & Kühnert, Barbara & D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Nathalie (eds.), Laboratory phonology
10
1, 587–605. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank, Michael C. & Goodman, Noah D. & Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2007. A Bayesian framework for cross-situational word-learning. In Platt, J. & Koller, D. & Singer, Y. & Roweis, S. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20: 21st Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2007, 41–48. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc. (31 vols.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. 1996. Similarity and frequency in phonology. Evanston: Northwestern University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Frisch, Stefan A. 2004. Language processing and segmental OCP effects. In Hayes, Bruce & Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.), Phonetically-based phonology, 346–371. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. 2011. Frequency effects. In van Oostendorp, Marc & Ewen, Colin J. & Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, volume IV: Phonological interfaces, 2137–2163. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. 2012. Phonotactic patterns in lexical corpora. In Cohn, Abigail C. & Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 458–470. New York: Oxford University Press. (With assistance from Renwick, Margaret E. L.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. & Brea-Spahn, María R. 2010. Metalinguistic judgments of phonotactics by monolinguals and bilinguals. Laboratory Phonology 1(2). 345–360. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. & Large, Nathan R. & Pisoni, David B. 2000. Perception of wordlikeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language 42(4). 481–496. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Broe, Michael B. 2004. Similarity avoidance and the OCP. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(1). 179–228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. & Stearns, Adrienne M. 2006. Linguistic and metalinguistic tasks in phonology: Methods and findings. In Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline & Schlesewsky, Matthias & Vogel, Ralf (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, 70–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, Stefan A. & Zawaydeh, Bushra Adnan. 2001. The psychological reality of OCP-Place in Arabic. Language 77(1). 91–106. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garrett, Andrew & Johnson, Keith. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Yu, Alan C. L. (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goad, Heather. 2001. Assimilation phenomena and initial constraint ranking in early grammars. In Do, H.-J. Anna & Domínguez, Laura & Johansen, Aimee (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 25), vol. 11, 307–318. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldrick, Matthew. 2007. Connectionist principles in theories of speech production. In Gaskell, Gareth M. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 515–530. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldrick, Matthew & Blumstein, Sheila E. 2006. Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(6). 649–683. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldrick, Matthew & Daland, Robert. 2009. Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar networks. Phonology 26(1). 147–185. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge: MIT. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Goldsmith, John A. (ed.) 1993. The last phonological rule: Reflections on constraints and derivations. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John A. & Larson, Gary. 1990. Local modeling and syllabification. In Ziolkowski, Michael & Noske, Manuela & Deaton, Karen (eds.), Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, volume 2: The parasession on the syllable in phonetics & phonology, 129–142. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason. 2012. Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: The case of Finnish vowel harmony. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(3). 859–896. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldwater, Sharon & Griffiths, Thomas L. & Johnson, Mark. 2009. A Bayesian framework for word segmentation: Exploring the effects of context. Cognition 112(1). 21–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark. 2003. Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model. In Spenader, Jennifer & Eriksson, Anders & Dahl, Östen (eds.), Variation within Optimality Theory: Proceedings of the Stockholm workshop on variation within Optimality Theory, 111–120. Stockholm: Stockholm University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldwater, Sharon & Johnson, Mark. 2004. Priors in Bayesian learning of phonological rules. Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology: Current Themes in Computational Phonology and Morphology, 35–42. Barcelona: Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gorman, Kyle. 2013. Generative phonotactics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Guy, Gregory R. 1991a. Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change 3(1). 1–22. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guy, Gregory R. 1991b. Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change 3(2). 223–239. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2009. A probabilistic model of phonological relationships from contrast to allophony. Columbus: The Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Hall, Kathleen Currie. 2012. Phonological relationships: A probabilistic model. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). 1–14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Kathleen Currie & Hume, Elizabeth & Jaeger, T. Florian & Wedel, Andrew B. 2018. The role of predicability in shaping phonological patterns. Linguistic Vanguard 4(s2). 1–15. (Article no. 20170027.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18(1–3). 54–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hare, Mary. 1992. The role of similarity in Hungarian vowel harmony: A connectionist account. In Sharkey, Noel E. (ed.), Connectionist natural language processing: Readings from Connection Science, 295–322. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harlow, Ray. 1991. Consonant dissimilation in Maori. In Blust, Robert A. (ed.), Currents in Pacific Linguistics: Papers on Austronesian languages and ethnolinguistics in honour of George W. Grace (Pacific Linguistics Series C-117), 117–128. Canberra: Pacific Linguisitcs (The Australian National University).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hashimoto, Daiki. 2021. Probabilistic reduction and mental accumulation in Japanese: Frequency, contextual predictability, and average predictability. Journal of Phonetics 871. (Article 101061.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer & Foulkes, Paul. 2016. The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language 92(2). 298–330. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer & Nolan, Aaron & Drager, Katie K. 2006. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 351–379. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa Cziráky. 2006. Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23(1). 59–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce & Siptár, Péter & Zuraw, Kie & Londe, Zsuzsa. 2009. Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language 85(4). 822–863. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin. 2008. A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 39(3). 379–440. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heinz, Jeffrey. 2010. Learning long-distance phonotactics. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4). 623–661. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles Francis. 1955. A manual of phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hume, Elizabeth. 2008. Markedness and the language user. Phonological Studies 111. 83–98.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hume, Elizabeth & Mailhot, Frédéric. 2013. The role of entropy and surprisal in phonologization and language change. In Yu, Alan C. L. (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 29–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jarosz, Gaja. 2006. Rich lexicons and restrictive grammars: Maximum likelihood learning in Optimality Theory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Johnson, Elizabeth K. & Jusczyk, Peter W. 2001. Word segmentation by 8-month-olds: When speech cues count more than statistics. Journal of Memory and Language 44(4). 548–567. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Keith. 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4). 485–499. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, ‘Ōiwi Parker. 2008. Phonotactic probability and the Māori passive: A computational approach. In Eisner, Jason & Heinz, Jeffrey (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group on Computational Morphology and Phonology (SIGMORPHON 2008), 39–48. Columbus: Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jurafsky, Dan. 2003. Probablistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In Bod, Rens & Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probablistic linguistics, 39–95. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2012. What statistics do learners track? Rules, constraints or schemas in (artificial) grammar learning. In Gries, Stefan Th. & Divjak, Dagmar (eds.), Frequency effects in language, volume 1: Frequency effects in language learning and processing, 53–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Katz, Jerrold J. 1964. Semi-sentences. In Fodor, Jerry A. & Katz, Jerrold J. (eds.), The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, 400–416. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2011. Experimental approaches in theoretical phonology. In van Oostendorp, Marc & Ewen, Colin J. & Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, volume IV: Phonological interfaces, 2283–2303. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keller, Frank. 2000. Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Keller, Frank. 2006. Linear optimality theory as a model of gradience in grammar. In Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline & Schlesewsky, Matthias & Vogel, Ralf (eds.), Gradience in grammar: Generative perspectives, 270–288. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirov, Christo & Wilson, Colin. 2013. Bayesian speech production: Evidence from latency and hyperarticulation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 351. 788–793.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variablity of the English copula. Language 45(4). 715–762. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William. 2004. Quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. In Ammon, Ulrich & Dittmar, Norbert & Mattheier, Klaus J. & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, 2nd edn., vol. 11, 6–21. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laks, Bernard. 1995. A connectionist account of French syllabification. Lingua 95(1-3). 51–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lau, Jey Han & Clark, Alexander & Lappin, Shalom. 2017. Grammaticality, acceptability, and probability: A probabilistic view of linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Science 41(5). 1202–1241. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Legendre, Géraldine & Miyata, Yoshiro & Smolensky, Paul. 1990. Can connectionism contribute to syntax? Harmonic grammar, with an application. In Ziolkowski, Michael & Noske, Manuela & Deaton, Karen (eds.), Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, volume 1: The general session, 237–252. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leung, Man-Tak & Law, Sam-Po & Fung, Suk-Yee. 2004. Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(3). 500–505. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J. (eds.), Experimental phonology, 13–44. Orlando: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maddieson, Ian & Precoda, Kristin. 1992. Syllable structure and phonetic models. Phonology 9(1). 45–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martin, Andy. 2007. The evolving lexicon. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Maye, Jessica & Werker, Janet F. & Gerken, LouAnn. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82(3). B101–B111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, John J. 1986. OCP Effects: Gemination and antigemination. Linguistic Inquiry 17(2). 207–263.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McClelland, James L. & Elman, Jeffrey L. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18(1). 1–86. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCollum, Adam G. 2018. Vowel dispersion and Kazakh labial harmony. Phonology 35(2). 287–326. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McQueen, James M. 1998. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language 39(1). 21–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McQueen, James M. & Cutler, Anne & Norris, Dennis. 2006. Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 30(6). 1113–1126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mester, Ralf-Armin. 1986. Studies in tier structure. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2013. Over- and under- generalization in learning derivational morphology. In Keine, Stefan & Sloggett, Shayne (eds.), NELS 42: Proceedings of the Forty-Second Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, vol. 21, 41–54. Amherst: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moore-Cantwell, Claire. 2016. The representation of probabilistic phonological patterns: Neurological, behavioral, and computational evidence from the English stress system. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Moreton, Elliott. 2002. Structural constraints in the perception of English stop-sonorant clusters. Cognition 84(1). 55–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25(1). 83–127. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Munson, Benjamin & Edwards, Jan & Beckman, Mary E. 2012. Phonological representations in language acquisition: Climbing the ladder of abstraction. In Cohn, Abigail C. & Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 288–309. New York: Oxford University Press. (With assistance from Renwick, Margaret E. L.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, James. 2007. Linking data to grammar in phonology: Two case studies. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 33(2). 1–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, James. 2012. Testing phonological grammars with lexical data. In Myers, James (ed.), In search of grammar: Experimental and corpus-based studies, 139–174. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Myers, James & Tsay, Jane. 2005. The processing of phonological acceptability judgments. (Paper presented at the Proceedings of Symposium on 90–92 NSC Projects, Taipei, 28–29 May 2005.)
Newport, Elissa L. & Aslin, Richard N. 2004. Learning at a distance: I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48(2). 127–162. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Norris, Dennis & McQueen, James M. 2008. Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review 115(2). 357–395. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1986. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental psychology: General 115(1). 39–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Orzechowska, Paula & Ridouane, Rachid. 2018. The structure of vowelless verbal roots in Tashlhiyt Berber. In Klessa, Katarzyna & Bachan, Jolanta & Wagner, Agnieszka & Karpiński, Maciej & Śledziński, Daniel (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 537–541. ISCA Archive. ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-04-10.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Stricture in feature geometry. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padgett, Jaye. 2004. Russian vowel reduction and Dispersion Theory. Phonological Studies 71. 81–96.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padgett, Jaye & Tabain, Marija. 2005. Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica 62(1). 14–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paolillo, John C. 2002. Analyzing linguistic variation: Statistical models and methods. Stanford: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pater, Joe. 1999. Austrturnonesian nasal substitution and other NC effects. In Kager, René & van der Hulst, Harry & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), The prosody morphology interface, 310–343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierce, John R. 1961. An introduction to information theory: Symbols, signals, and noise. 1st edn. New York: Dover Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1993. Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. In Schafer, Amy J. (ed.), NELS 23: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society
23
1, vol. 21, 367–381. Amherst: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1994. Syllable structure and word structure: A study of triconsonantal clusters in English. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in laboratory phonology
III
1, 168–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2001b. Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained. Language and Cognitive Processes 16(5-6). 691–698. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003a. Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech 46(2-3). 115–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2003b. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimation and robustness. In Bod, Rens & Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probability theory in linguistics, 177–228. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2016. Phonological representation: Beyond abstract versus episodic. Annual Review of Linguistics 21. 33–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2022. More than seventy years of probablistic phonology. In Dresher, B. Elan & van der Hulst, Harry (eds.), The Oxford history of phonology, 639–655. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plaut, David C. & Kello, Christopher T. 1999. The emergence of phonology from the interplay of speech comprehension and production: A distributed connectionist approach. In MacWhinney, Brian (ed.), The emergence of language, 381–415. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pluymaekers, Mark & Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald. 2005. Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica 62(2–4). 146–159. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan S. & Smolensky, Paul. 2004[1993]. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden: Blackwell. (Final version of the widely-circulated 1993 Technical Report.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan S. & Tesar, Bruce. 2004. Learning phonotactic distributions. In Kager, René & Pater, Joe & Zonneveld, Wim (eds.), Constraints in phonological acquisition, 245–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rácz, Péter & Hay, Jennifer & Needle, Jeremy & King, Jeanette & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2016. Gradient Māori phonotactics. Te Reo 591. 3–21.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riggle, Jason Alan. 2004. Generation, recognition, and learning in finite-state Optimality Theory. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Rose, Yvan & MacWhinney, Brian & Byrne, Rodrique & Hedlund, Gregory & Maddocks, Keith & O’Brien, Philip & Wareham, Todd. 2006. Introducting Phon: A software solution for the study of phonological acquisition. In Bamman, David & Magnitskaia, Tatiana & Zaller, Colleen (eds.), BUCLD 30: Proceedings of the 30th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 489–500. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, Jenny R. & Aslin, Richard N. & Newport, Elissa L. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274(5294). 1926–1928. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, Jenny R. 2003. Statistical language learning: Mechanisms and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12(4). 110–114. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sankoff, David & Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith, Eric. 2005. GoldVarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto. ([URL]) (Accessed 2023-04-21.)
Scarborough, Rebecca Anne. 2004. Coarticulation and the structure of the lexicon. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Schatz, Thomas & Feldman, Naomi H. & Goldwater, Sharon & Cao, Xuan-Nga & Dupoux, Emmanuel. 2021. Early phonetic learning without phonetic categories: Insights from large-scale simulations on realistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(7). 1–12. (Article e2001844118.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shannon, Claude E. & Weaver, Warren. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 1979. Speech errors as evidence for a serial-ordering mechanism in sentence production. In Copper, William E. & Walker, Edward C. T. (eds.), Sentence processing: Psycholinguistic studies presented to Merrill Garrett, 295–342. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaw, Jason & Kawahara, Shigeto. 2018. Predictability and phonology: Past, present and future. Linguistic Vanguard 4(s2). 1–11. (Article no. 20180042.) ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shi, Lei & Griffiths, Thomas L. & Feldman, Naomi H. & Sanborn, Adam N. 2010. Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(4). 443–464. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skousen, Royal. 1989. Analogical modeling of language. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skousen, Royal. 1992. Analogy and structure. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Skousen, Royal. 1995. Analogy: A non-rule alternative to neural networks. Rivista di Linguistica 7(2). 213–231.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smolensky, Paul. 1988. On the proper treatment of connectionism. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 111. 1–23. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smolensky, Paul. 1996. On the comprehension/production dilemma in child language. Linguistic Inquiry 27(4). 720–731.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smolensky, Paul. 2006. Harmony in linguistic cognition. Cognitive Science 30(5). 779–801. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smolensky, Paul & Goldrick, Matthew & Mathis, Donald. 2014. Optimization and quantization in gradient symbol systems: A framework for integrating the continuous and the discrete in cognition. Cognitive Science 38(6). 1102–1138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smolensky, Paul & Legendre, Géraldine. 2006. The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar. Cambridge: The MIT Press. (21 vols.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Solé, Maria-Josep & Beddor, Patrice Speeter & Ohala, Manjari. 2007. Experimental approaches to phonology. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sorace, Antonella & Keller, Frank. 2005. Gradience in linguistic data. Lingua 115(11). 1497–1524. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
St. John, Mark F. & McClelland, James L. 1988. Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension (Technical Report AIP 39). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stanley, Richard. 1967. Redundancy rules in phonology. Language 43(2). 393–436. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Staubs, Robert D. 2014. Computational modeling of learning biases in stress typology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Suomi, Kari & McQueen, James M. & Cutler, Anne. 1997. Vowel harmony and speech segmentation in Finnish. Journal of Memory and Language 36(3). 422–444. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul. 2000. Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thomas, Michael S. C. & McClelland, James L. 2008. Connectionist models of cognition. In Sun, Ron (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology, 23–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tilsen, Sam. 2009. Subphonemic and cross-phonemic priming in vowel shadowing: Evidence for the involvement of exemplars in production. Journal of Phonetics 37(3). 276–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Treiman, Rebecca & Kessler, Brett & Knewasser, Stephanie & Tincoff, Ruth & Bowman, Margo. 2000. English speakers’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, 269–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tupper, Paul F. 2015. Exemplar dynamics and sound merger in language. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 75(4). 1469–1492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turnbull, Rory John. 2015. Assessing the listener-oriented account of predictability-based phonetic reduction. Columbus: The Ohio State University. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Vousden, Janet I. & Brown, Gordon D. A. & Harley, Trevor A. 2000. Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology 41(2). 101–175. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vroomen, Jean & Tuomainen, Jyrki & de Gelder, Beatrice. 1998. The roles of word stress and vowel harmony in speech segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language 38(2). 133–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warner, Natasha & Jongman, Allard & Sereno, Joan A. & Kemps, Rachèl. 2004. Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32(2). 251–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wedel, Andrew B. 2003. Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology. In Nowak, Pawel M. & Yoquelet, Corey & Mortensen, David (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 611–622. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wedel, Andrew B. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23(3). 247–274. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wedel, Andrew B. & Kaplan, Abby & Jackson, Scott. 2013. High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 128(2). 179–186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
White, Katherine S. & Peperkamp, Sharon & Kirk, Cecilia & Morgan, James L. 2008. Rapid acquisition of phonological alternations by infants. Cognition 107(1). 238–265. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30(5). 945–982. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilson, Colin & Davidson, Lisa. 2013. Bayesian analysis of non-native cluster production. In Kan, Seda & Moore-Cantwell, Claire & Staubs, Robert (eds.), NELS 40: Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the North East Lingusitic Society, vol. II1, 265–278. Amherst: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Fei & Tenenbaum, Joshua B. 2007. Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review 114(2). 245–272. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yip, Moira. 1989. Feature geometry and cooccurrence restrictions. Phonology 6(2). 349–374. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuraw, Kie Ross. 2000. Patterned exceptions in phonology. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles. (Doctoral dissertation.)
Zuraw, Kie Ross. 2003. Probability in language change. In Bod, Rens & Hay, Jennifer & Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.), Probabilistic linguistics, 139–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuraw, Kie. 2007. The role of phonetic knowledge in phonotactic patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Language 83(2). 277–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zuraw, Kie & Hayes, Bruce. 2017. Intersecting constraint families: An argument for harmonic grammar. Language 93(3). 497–548. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)