On some mysteries, asymmetries and derivation of potential de construction in Chinese
In this paper, some mysteries and asymmetries of the Chinese potential
de construction are investigated. It is shown that a morphosytnactic approach is conducive to accounting for these puzzles. First we explore the possibility of taking
de and its negative counterpart -
bude as functional heads (cf.
Tsai 2001;
T. Wu 2004). It is proposed that
bude could be a functional head with the negative potential (i.e. impossible/impermissible) meaning. This could be evidenced by both empirical data and theoretical deduction. It is argued that
bu in V-
bu-R, which is distinct from the normal pre-verbal negative morpheme
bu, is actually
bude. This helps to explain why the negative potential meaning is involved in V-
bu-R. Meanwhile, V-
de/bude and V-
de/bu-R are both assumed to be formed through Morphological Merger (cf.
Marantz 1988;
Embick & Noyer 2001,
2007, etc.). Meanwhile, we have discussed some asymmetries observed between V-
de/bude and V-
de/bu-R and some paradigmatic asymmetries between potential V-
de construction and its negative potential V-
bude construction. It is assumed that these syntactic asymmetries may be due to some morphological operations related to
de and
bude.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Some mysteries and asymmetries in potential de construction
- 2.1Adverbial modification
- 2.1.1Manner adverbial restriction
- 2.1.2Manner zenme and question zenme
- 2.1.3Duration/Frequency phrase restriction
- 2.2Imperative form restriction
- 2.3Some asymmetries
- 2.3.1Asymmetries between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R
- 2.3.1.1Case-assignability of V’s
- 2.3.1.2Double object construction
- 2.3.1.3Movement asymmetries between V-de/bude and V-de/bu-R
- 2.3.2Asymmetries between V-de and V-bude
- 3.The grammaticalization of de and bude
- 4.
De and bude as functional heads
- 4.1
De as a functional head
- 4.2
Bude as a functional head
- 4.2.1The acquisition problem of V-bu-R
- 4.2.2
Bu(de) and intervention effect
- 4.2.3The counterparts of bude in other dialects
- 4.2.4V-bu-R = V-bude-R
- 5.The derivation of V-de and V-bude
- 5.1The formalization of grammatical change of de and bude
- 5.2V-bude is not derived from V-de
- 5.3The derivation of V-de and V-bude: between morphology and syntax
- 6.The derivation of V-de-R and V-bu-R
- 6.1LF movement analysis in T. Wu (2004)
- 6.2A morphosyntactic approach to V-de/bu-R
- 6.2.1A proposal
- 6.2.2Morphological Merger
- 6.2.3Local Dislocation in the formation of V-de/bu-R
- 7.Puzzles and asymmetries revisited
- 7.1Restrictions revisited
- 7.2Asymmetries revisited
- 8.Conclusion and discussions
- 8.1Conclusion
- 8.2Unsolved problems and discussions
-
Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (97)
References
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-constructions and Transparent Logical Form. Tübingen: University of Tübingen dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14.11: 1–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beck, Sigrid, & Shin-Sook Kim. 1997. On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6.41: 339–384. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. A-chains at the PF-interface: copies and ‘covert’ movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 201: 197–267. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chao, Yuen-Ren. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Li, Po-lun Lee, & Haihua Pan. 2013. Hanyu foudingci ‘bu’ de jufadiwei [The syntactic status of bu in Mandarin]. Yuyan Kexue [
Linguistic Sciences
] 41: 337–348.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, Qianrui. 2008. Hanyu Timao Yanjiu de Leixingxue Shiye [A Typological View on Aspects in Mandarin Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Gong, & Jianguo Xiong. 2014. Zhongguo he dongnanya yu zhong de de zi jiegou [On the de construction in China and other East Asian languages]. Paper presented at Third Symposium on Syntax and Semantics in China, October 18–19, 2014. Xiangtan: Xiangtan University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, & Rint Sybesma. 2003. Forked modality. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2003, ed. by Leonie M. E. A. Cornips & Paula Fikkert, 13–23. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, & Rint Sybesma. 2004. Postverbal “can” in Cantonese (and Hakka) and agree. Lingua 114.41: 419–446. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Zoey Jui-Yi. 2012. Investigating the syntax of postverbal modals in Hakka. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 10.11: 69–114.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dahl, Östen. 2010. Typology of negation. The Expression of Negation, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, 9–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dong, Xiufang. 2011. Cihuihua: Hanyu Shuangyinci de Yansheng he Fazhan [
Lexicalization: the Origin and Evolution of Chinese Disyllabic Words
] (revised edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32.41: 555–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David, & Rolf Noyer. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ed. by Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernst, Thomas. 1995. Negation in Mandarin Chinese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13.41: 665–707. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernst, Thomas. 2014. Adverbial adjuncts in Mandarin Chinese. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, 49–72. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fan, Li. 2007. Ertong dui Putonghua zhong foudingci de zaoqi huode [Early child language acquisition of negative words in Mandarin Chinese]. Xiandai Waiyu [
Modern Foreign Languages
] 30.21: 144–154.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli. 2005. Hanyu Yunlü Yufa Yanjiu [
Studies on Chinese Prosodic Grammar
]. Beijing: Peking University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli. 2009. Hanyu de Yunlü, Cifa yu Jufa [
Interactions between Morphology, Syntax and Prosody in Chinese
] (revised edition). Beijing: Peking University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feng, Shengli. 2014. Historical syntax of Chinese. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson, 537–575. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gelderen, Elly van. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hackl, Martin. 1998. On the Semantics of ‘Ability Attributions’. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris, & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, ed. by Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi, & Rolf Noyer. 1999. State-of-the-article: distributed morphology. Glot International 4.41: 3–9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Jianhua. 2007. Fouding jiaodian yu xiayu [Negation, focus and scope]. Zhongguo Yuwen [
Studies of the Chinese Language
] 21: 99–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hu, Xiaoming. 2010. A New Study on Mandarin Irrealis “V DE/BU X” Construction. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James. 1988.
Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 641: 274–311. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James. 2006. Resultatives and unaccusatives: a parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 2531: 1–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James. 2014. On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, ed. by Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & W.-T. Dylan Tsai, 1–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li, & Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Shin-Sook. 2002. Intervention effects are focus effects. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 101: 615–628.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ko, Heejeong. 2005. Syntax of why-in-situ: merge into [Spec, CP] in the overt syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23.41: 867–916. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, ed. by Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Legate, Julie Anne. 2014. Voice and v: Lessons from Acehnese. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Haoze, & Chi-Hang Candice Cheung. 2012. Hanyu jidian ganshe xiaoying de jufafenxi [The syntactic analysis of focus intervention effects in Mandarin]. Yuyan Kexue [
Linguisitic Sciences
] 11.21: 113–125.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Liding. 1963[1994]. Dai ‘de’ zi de buyu ju [Sentences with de-complements]. Zhongguo Yuwen 1963.51: 396–410. Also in Li Lingding Zixuanji [
Selected Papers of Lingding Li
], 12–47. Zhengzhou: Henan Educational Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Mei. 2007. Xiandai Hanyu Foudingjufa Yanjiu [
Negation in Chinese
]. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2010. Case and objects. Paper resented in GLOW-in-Asia 8, August 12–14, 2010. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Yen-Hui Audrey. 2011. Non-canonical objects and case. Korea Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 1.11: 21–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lien, Chinfa. 2011. Interface of modality and tit4 得 constructions in South Min: a case study of their development from earlier Southern Min in the Ming and Qing to Modern Taiwanese Southern Min. Language and Linguistics 12.41: 723–752.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Jo-wang. 1992. The Syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1.31: 293–331. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Jo-wang, & Chih-Chen Jane Tang. 1995. Modals as verbs in Chinese: a GB perspective. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica 66.11: 53–105.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2011. Finiteness of clauses and raising of arguments in Mandarin Chinese. Syntax 14.11: 48–73.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2012. Multiple-modal constructions in Mandarin Chinese and their finiteness properties. Journal of Linguistics 48.11: 151–186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Na. 2012. On the Syntax, Semantics and Typology of Non-Canonical Passives. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lü, Shuxiang. 1990[1944]. Yu dongci hou ‘de’ yu ‘bu’ youguan de cixu wenti [The issue of word order in connection with the post-verbal de and bu
]. Lü Shuxiang Wenji [
Papers by Lü Shuxiang
], Vol. 21, ed. by Shuxiang Lü, 132–144. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1988. Clitics, morphological merger, and the mapping to phonological structure. Theoretical Morphology: Approches in Modern Linguistics, ed. by M. Hammond & M. Noonan, 253–270. San Diego: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCloskey, James. 1996. On the Scope of Verb Movement in Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14.11: 47–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 1991. Cong Handai de dong-sha he dong-si lai kan dongbu jiegou de fazhang [A look at the development of the verb-resultative construction from ‘V-kill’ and ‘V-die’ in the Han dynasty]. Yuyanxue Luncong [
Essays on Linguistics
] 161: 112–136.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mei, Tsu-Lin. 2012. The causative *s- and nominalizing *-s in Old Chinese and related matters in Proto-Sino-Tibetan. Language and Linguistics 13.11: 1–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study of Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 31, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 223–251. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian G. 1985. Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3.11: 21–58.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shi, Guanquan. 1985. Guanyu zhuci ‘de’ de jige wenti [Problems in connection with particle de
]. Yufa Yanjiu yu Tansuo [
Researches and Explorations in Chinese Grammar
], ed. by Zhongguo Yuwen Zazhishe [Editorial office of Studies of Chinese Language], Vol. 31, 247–280. Beijing: Peking University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayosh. 1985. Passives and Related Constructions: A Prototype Analysis. Language 61.41: 821–848. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sun, Chaofen. 1996. Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Stanford: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, Anna. 2006. Strong vs. weak islands. The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 41, ed. by Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk, 479–531. Malden: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 2001. Functional projections and adverbial expressions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 2.21: 203–241.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1992. Hanyu Cifa Jufa Si [
Studies on Chinese Morphology and Syntax IV
]. Taipei: Student Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tang, Ting-Chi. 1999. Minnanyu Yufa Yanjiu Shilun [
Papers on Southern Min Syntax
]. Taipei: Student Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Sandra Annear. 1973. Resultative verb compounds in Mandarin Chinese: a case for lexical rules. Language 49.21: 361–379. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 1994. On Economizing the Theory of A-Bar Dependencies. Cambridge: The MIT dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2001. On subject specificity and theory of syntax-semantics interface. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10.21: 129–168. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 171: 83–115. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Chyan-an Arthur. 2010. The Microparametric Syntax of Resultatives in Chinese Languages. New York: New York University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Chyan- an Arthur. 2011. A New Analysis of Resultatives in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at The Fifth International Conference on Formal Linguistics, December 10–12, 2011. Guangzhou: Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.
Wang, Changsong. 2014a. Exploring the Interface between Syntax and Morphology – A Case Study of de in Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Changsong. 2014b. Cong beidongju kan zhe ben shu de chuban
[Looking at passives sentences through zhe ben shu de chuban
]. Language and Linguistics 15.21: 231–264.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Guosheng. 1998. Kenengshi de ziju de jufa buduicheng xianxiang [On the syntactic asymmetries involved in the potential de construction]. Yuyan Yanjiu [
Studies in Language and Linguistics
] 11: 23–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wei, Pei-chuan. 2004. Jindai Hanyu nengxing dongbu jiegou zhong binyu de weizhi [Object position in verb-complement potential constructions in early Mandarin]. Language and Linguistics 5.31: 663–704.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Alexander. 2014. Causal VVs in Mandarin. The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, ed. by C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson, 311–341. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, Ching-Huei Teresa. 2004. On de/bu and the syntactic nature of resultative verbal compounding. Language and Linguistics 5.11: 271–329.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, Fuxiang. 2002. Nengxing shubu jiegou suoyi [Some remarks on the potential verb-complement construction in Chinese]. Yuyan Jiaoxue yu Yanjiu [
Language Teaching and Research
] 51: 19–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe. 2004. Grammaticalization and Language Change in Chinese: A Formal View. London & New York: RoutledgeCurzon. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xie, Zhiguo. 2012. The modal uses of de and temporal shifting in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21.41: 387–420. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Xu, Ding. 1997. Functional categories in Mandarin Chinese. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2008. Intervention Effects and the Covert Component of Grammar. Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University dissertation.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Barry Chung-Yu. 2012. Intervention effects and wh-construals. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21.11: 43–87. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yue, Jun-fa. 1984. “De” zi ju de chansheng he yanbian [On the origin and development of sentences with de]. Yuyan Yanjiu [
Studies in Language and Linguistics
] 21: 10–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhou, Guoguang. 2002. Ertong shiyong foudingci ‘bu’ jiqi xiangguang fouding jiegou de kaocha [An investigation of the children’s use of the negative bu and the structure of negation]. Yuyan Wenzi Yingyong [
Applied Linguistics
] 41: 42–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhu, Dexi. 1982. Yufa Jiangyi [
Lecture Notes on Grammar
]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhuang, Huibin. 2014. The prosodic history of Chinese resultatives. Language and Linguistics 15.41: 575–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wang, Changsong & Mingming Zheng
2020.
A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Patient-Subject Constructions in Chinese.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics 41:1
► pp. 33 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.