Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 1:2 (2019) ► pp.234259
References
Bavelas, Janet B., Linda Coates & Trudy Johnson
2000Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 791. 941–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1981aSystemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm C. Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981bTowards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.Google Scholar
2016Dynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 9(1). 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1988Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11(1). 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
2003aPart 1 Approaches to the simplex clause. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. (Studies in Language Companion Series 63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2003bPart 2 From clause to discourse and beyond. Structure and function: A guide to three major structural-functional theories. (Studies in Language Companion Series 64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. & Miriam Taverniers
2008aIntroduction. Linguistics 46(4). 679–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008bLayering in structural-functional grammars. Linguistics 46(4). 689–756. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton, Deirdre
1980Dialogue and discourse. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981Analysing spoken discourse. In Malcolm C. Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 146–157. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Jean E. Fox Tree
2002Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 841. 73–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline
1997Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In Frances Christie & James R. Martin (eds.), Genre and Institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, 196–230. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe
2009Hypotheses of natural phonology. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 45(1). 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, John W.
2007The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne & Diana Slade
1997Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell. [Reprinted by Equinox 2005].Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J.
2017How we talk: The inner workings of conversation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Feez, Susan, Rick Iedema & Peter R. R. White
1994Media literacy (write it right literacy in industry research project – Stage 2). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program. [reprinted Sydney: NSW AMES 2008]Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A., Sandra A. Thompson, Cecilia C. Ford & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2013Conversation analysis and linguistics. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Strivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 726–740. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967aNotes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967bNotes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2). 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1968Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 3. Journal of Linguistics 4(2). 179–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3). 322–361.Google Scholar
1984Language as code and language as behaviour: A systemic-functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of dialogue. In Robin Fawcett, Michael A. K. Halliday, Sydney M. Lamb & Adam Makkai (eds.), The semiotics of language and culture, volume 1: Language as social semiotic, 3–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1985An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & William S. Greaves
2008Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. (English Language Series 9). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hao, Jing
In press. Nominalisations in scientific English: A tristratal perspective. Functions of Language.
Hepburn, Alexa & Galina B. Bolden
2013The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Strivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation, 57–76. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hood, Susan
2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1988On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems (Special issue Language, interaction, and social problems ) 35(4). 418–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knight, Naomi
2010Wrinkling complexity: Concepts of identity and affiliation in humour. New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.). 35–58. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013Evaluating experience in funny ways: How friends bond through conversational humour. Text & Talk 33(4–5). 553–574.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1984Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications (Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics), 43–70. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & David Fanshel
1977Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
1967Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (Proceedings of the 1966 spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society), 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2005Living with Manny’s dangerous idea. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 431–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark
2014More on Um and Uh. Language Log. [URL]
Lindström, Anna & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2013Affiliation in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Strivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 350–369. Chichester: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000aBeyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2000bFactoring out exchange: Types of structure. In Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Frances Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 19–40. Tubingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Semantic variation: Modelling system, text and affiliation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2011Bridging troubled waters: Interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick. In Frances Christie & Karl Maton (eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives, 35–61. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013Systemic functional grammar: A next step into the theory – axial relations. (with Chinese translation and extensions by Wang Pin & Zhu Yongsheng). Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
2017The discourse semantics of attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. Russian Journal of Linguistics Vestnik RUDN (Special issue Discourse analysis in the 21st Century: Theory and practice ) 21(1). 22–47. Republished as Attitudinal relations: Continuing the study of lexis. In Leila Barbara, Adail S. Rodriques-Júnior & Giovanna M. V. Hoy (eds.), Estudos e pesquisas em linguística sistêmico-funcional, 53–87. São Paulo: Mercado de Letras 2017.Google Scholar
2018Interpersonal meaning: Systemic functional linguistic perspectives. Functions of Language (Special Issue Systemic functional linguistics and interpersonal grammar , edited by James R. Martin) 25(1). 2–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Shooshi Dreyfus
2015Scaffolding semogenesis: Designing teacher/student interactions for face-to-face and on-line learning. In Sonja Starc, Carys Jones & Arianna Maiorani (eds.), Meaning making in text: Multimodal and multilingual functional perspectives, 265–298. London: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Mary Macken-Horarik
(eds.) 2003Negotiating heteroglossia: Social perspectives on evaluation. Special Issue of Text and Talk . 23(2).Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Guenter Plum
1997Construing experience: Some story genres. Journal of Narrative and Life History (Special Issue Oral versions of personal experience: Three decades of narrative analysis , edited by Michael Bamberg) 7 (1–4). 299–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause (2nd Edition). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. & Michele Zappavigna
2016aExploring restorative justice: Dialectics of theory and practice. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law. 23(2). 217–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bRites of passion: Remorse, apology and forgiveness in Youth Justice Conferencing. Linguistics and the Human Sciences (Special issue Legal discourse , edited by Wang Zhenhua) 12(2–3). 101–121.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Michael A. K. Halliday
2009Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson
(eds.) 1996Interaction and grammar. (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oteíza, Teresa
2017The appraisal framework and discourse analysis. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 457–472. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plum, Guenter
1998Text and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre-based approach, volumes 1 & 21. (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 10). Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In John M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna
2013Emotion, affect and conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Sirens (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 330–349. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel A.
2010Some other “uh(m)”s. Discourse Processes. 47(2). 130–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2001Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McH
1972A course in spoken English: Grammar. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya
2008Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(1). 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tann, Ken
2017Context and meaning in the Sydney architecture of SFL. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.) Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 438–456. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2005The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Language and Linguistics 6(4). 807–837.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987The structure of social interaction: A systemic approach to the semiotics of service encounters. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Walker, Gareth
2013Phonetics and prosody in conversation. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation, 456–474. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2000Dialogue and inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. in Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill & Francis Rock (eds.), Working with dialogue, 67–80. Tubingen: Neimeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Exploring the axiological workings of ‘reporter voice’ news stories – attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context & Media 1(2–3). 57–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele & James R. Martin
2018Discourse and diversionary justice: An analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Taverniers, Miriam
2021. Modelling interfaces with context in SFL. Functions of Language 28:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2020. Dialogic positioning in Khorchin Mongolian: The temporal and spatial dimensions of propositional engagement in conversations. Lingua 244  pp. 102920 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Dongbing
2021. Dynamism in knowledge exchanges: developing move systems based on Khorchin Mongolian interactions. Discourse Studies 23:3  pp. 386 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.