Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.3–21

Trinocular views of register

Approaching register trinocularly

| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Michael Halliday’s argument for the value of ‘trinocular vision’ in linguistic research has particular relevance to the observation, exploration and description of register. Taking each semiotic dimension relevant to the characterisation of register by turn, I begin by discussing Halliday’s proposition. I then proceed, using the metaphor of cartography, to examine register variation via the intersection of three semiotic dimensions: stratification, instantiation and metafunction. I discuss how such examinations enable us to create description maps of register variation. From this basis, I discuss a long-term programme of systematically producing descriptive maps of registers, which I and colleagues have begun. Finally, I suggest that by using such maps we can better understand such important phenomena as aggregates of registers and personal register repertoires.
Keywords: register, dialect, code, rank scale, trinocular vision, stratification, instantiation, registerial cartography, metafunction, systemic functional paradigm
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Halliday’s trinocular vision – applied to register
    • 2.1Trinocular vision
    • 2.2Shunting along global and local semiotic dimensions
    • 2.3Beyond semiotic systems: The ordered typology of systems
  • 3.The intersection of stratification and instantiation
  • 4.Registerial cartography
    • 4.1The notion of semiotic cartography
    • 4.2Registerial cartography
    • 4.3Adding another global semiotic dimension: The metafunctional spectrum
    • 4.4Further semiotic dimensions: axis and rank
    • 4.5Aggregates of registers
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00019.mat
References (49)
References
Anderson, Jon. 2015. Understanding cultural geography: Places and traces (2nd edition). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Kay, Mona Domosh, Steve Pile & Nigel Thrift. (eds.). 2003. Handbook of cultural geography. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A. 2008. Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John A., Janina Wildfeuer & Tuomo Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, research and analysis – A problem-oriented introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika & James R. Martin. 2010. New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1959. Diglossia. Word 151. 325–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R. 1957. Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael J. 1967. Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 31. 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grishman, Ralph & Richard Kittredge. (eds.). 1986. Analyzing language in restricted domains: Sublanguage description and processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo. 2002. Towards an understanding of workplace discourse – a pilot study for compiling a spoken Chinese corpus of situated discourse. In Christopher Candlin (ed.), Theory and practice of professional discourse, 137–185. Hong Kong: CUHK Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1961. Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17(3). 242–292. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 37–94. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2002.Google Scholar
1970. Functional diversity in language, as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 61. 322–361. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Studies in English Language, volume 7 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 164–204. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2005. Google Scholar
1973. Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1979. Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In David J. Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds.), Function and context in linguistic analysis: A festschrift for William Haas, 57–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 196–218. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2002.Google Scholar
1985. It’s a fixed word order language is English. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 67–681. 91–116. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Studies in English Language, volume 7 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 213–223. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2005.Google Scholar
1988. On the language of physical science. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features, 162–178. London & New York: Pinter Publishers. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 140–158. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2004.Google Scholar
1991. The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Thao Le & Mike McCausland (eds.), Interaction and development: Proceedings of the international conference, Vietnam, 30 March – 1 April 1991, 1–26. University of Tasmania: Language education. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 269–290. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2007.Google Scholar
1994. Language and the theory of codes. In Alan Sadovnik (ed.), Knowledge and pedagogy: The sociology of Basil Bernstein, 124–142. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and society, volume 10 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 231–246. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2007.Google Scholar
1996. On grammar and grammatics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory into practice, 1–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, On grammar, volume 1 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 384–417. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2002. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Computing meanings: Some reflections on past experience and present prospects. In Guowen Huang & Zongyan Wang (eds.), Discourse and language functions, 3–25. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. Reprinted in Michael A. K. Halliday, Computational and quantitative studies, volume 6 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 239–267. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum. 2005.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Strevens. 1964. The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1973. Code, register and social dialect. In Basil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (volume 21), 253–292. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1989. Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics 91. 221–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiippala, Tuomo. 2015. The structure of multimodal documents: An empirical approach. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D., Richard A. Hudson, Eugene Winter & Alick Henrici. 1968. Sentence and clause in scientific English: Final report of O.S.T.I. Programme. University College London: Communication Research Centre.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle. 2019. War and its ideologies: A social-semiotic theory and description. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Semantic variation – Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar
2007. The “architecture” of language according to systemic functional theory: Developments since the 1970s. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language (volume 21), 505–561. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2009. Multisemiotic and context-based register typology: Registerial variation in the complementarity of semiotic systems. In Eija Ventola & Arsenio J. M. Guijarro (eds.), The world told and the world shown, 11–38. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2013. Applying systemic functional linguistics in healthcare contexts. Text and Talk 33(4–5). 437–466.Google Scholar
2015a. Register in the round: Registerial cartography. Functional Linguistics 2(9). 1–48.Google Scholar
2015b. Registerial cartography: Context-based mapping of text types and their rhetorical-relational organisation. In Proceedings of PACLIC 28, 12–14 December, Thailand. [URL]
2015c. Modelling context and register: The long-term project of registerial cartography. In Revista Letras & Santa Maria (eds.), Estudos sistêmico-funcionais: Desdobramentos e interfaces, 501. 15–90.Google Scholar
2018. The notion of a multilingual meaning potential: A systemic exploration. In Akila Sellami-Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional linguistics, 90–120. London: Routledge. Version with additional figures to be available at: [URL]. DOI logo
2019. Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1).10–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Bo Wang & Yuanyi Ma. Forthcoming. Expounding register and registerial cartography in systemic functional linguistics: An interview with Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. Word.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Stella. 2012. Applying register analysis to varieties of English. In Monika Fludernik & Benjamin Kohlmann (eds.), Anglistentag 2011 Frei-burg Proceedings, 75–94. Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
. 2018. Register variation and regional varieties. The Third Halliday-Hasan Symposium, 28–19 November 2018.Google Scholar
Patten, Terry. 1988. Systemic text generation as problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism, philology. Archivum Linguisticum 81. 28–37.Google Scholar
Ure, Jean N. & Jeffrey Ellis. 1974. Register in descriptive linguistics and linguistic sociology. In Oscar Uribe-Villegas (ed.), Issues in sociolinguistics, 197–243. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zhang, Kaela P. 2018. Public health education through posters in two world cities: A multimodal corpus-based analysis. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Manerko, Larissa
2022. Focusing on Cognitive and Communicative Perspective in Specialized Knowledge Modelling Methodology. In Specialized Knowledge Mediation, ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Moslem Yousefi
2022. Systemic functional linguistics as a resource for teacher education and writing development. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Wenge, Derek Irwin & Junjun Xing
2020. Towards a systemic functional model for characterizing Chinese loanwords in English: The case of kowtow. Lingua 248 ► pp. 102977 ff. DOI logo
Tian, Jianqiu
2020. Construction of top university identity in high-stakes genres of public communication – a systemic functional discourse analysis of three genres of PKU and THU presidential talk and letter to prospective students. Journal of World Languages 6:1-2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.