Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.91–120

How international war law makes violence legal

A case study of the Rome Statute

ORCID logo | Macquarie University

Some international law scholars have argued that international war law, rather than proscribing violence in war, has instead been a vehicle for its legitimation. Given that laws are constituted in and through language, this paper explores this paradox through register analysis of the text of the Rome Statute, an international treaty adopted in 1998 which established the International Criminal Court to prosecute the crimes of “genocide”, “crimes against humanity”, “war crimes” and “crimes of aggression”. The parameters of field, tenor and mode are considered in conjunction with a brief account of linguistic features of Article 8 of the Rome Statute, which defines the scope of the term “war crimes”. The linguistic patterns provide evidence that the Rome Statute simultaneously outlaws some acts of violence while affording legal cover for others, despite their well-known devastating human consequences. The analysis provides linguistic evidence for Malešević’s (2010) claim that at the heart of modernity lies an “ontological dissonance”, through which we criminalise some forms of violence while legitimating others.

Keywords: Halliday, Hasan, register, IHL, war law, Rome Statute, organised violence, Malešević, case study, violence, legality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: the contradiction in international war law
  • 2.A brief theoretical excursus in law and in linguistics
  • 3.Register and ideology in one text: the case of the Rome Statute
    • 3.1Mode
    • 3.2Tenor
    • 3.3Field
  • 4.Extract: linguistic features
    • 4.1The fine print
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00022.luk
References
Annan, Kofi
1999 Preface. In Roy S. Lee (ed.), The international criminal court: The making of the Rome Statute, ix1–ix–x. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Combs, Nancy A.
2017 Grave crimes and weak evidence: A fact-finding evolution in international criminal law. Harvard International Law Journal 58(1). 47–125.Google Scholar
Crawford, Emily & Alison Pert
2015 International humanitarian law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, William
1992 Civilizations, empires, and wars: A quantitative history of war. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Incorporated.Google Scholar
Goody, Jack
(ed.) 1968 Literacy in traditional societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985 Spoken and written language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
2003a Is the grammar neutral? Is the grammarian neutral? In Michael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 271–292. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003b The act of meaning. In Michael A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 375–389. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2004 Introduction: How big is language? On the power of language. In Michael A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, xi–xxiv. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007 The notion of “context” in language education. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 269–290. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013 Language evolving: Some systemic functional reflections on the history of meaning. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Halliday in the 21st century, volume 11 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 237–253. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1985 Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., Angus McIntosh & Peter Stevens
2007 The users and uses of language. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and society, volume 10 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 5–37. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1994 Situation and the definition of genres. In Allen D. Grimshaw (ed.), What’s going on here: Complementary studies of professional talk, 127–127. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1995 The conception of context in text. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives, meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 183–283. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1999 Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics: Systemic perspectives, 219–328. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 The place of context in a systemic functional model. In Michael A. K. Halliday & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuum companion to systemic functional linguistics, 166–189. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2014 Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics 11. 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
in press. Tenor: Rethinking interactant relations. Language, context and text: The social semiotics forum. 2(2).
Jochnick, Chris af & Roger Normand
1994 The legitimation of violence: A critical history of the laws of war. Harvard International Law Journal 35(1). 49–95.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle
2019 War and its ideologies: A social-semiotic theory and description. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malešević, Siniša
2006 Identity as ideology: Understanding ethnicity and nationalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 The sociology of war and violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 The rise of organised brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mégret, Frédéric
2016 Theorizing the laws of war. In Anne Orford & Florian Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the theory of international law, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Normand, Roger & Chris af Jochnick
1994 The legitimation of violence: A critical history of the laws of war. Harvard International Law Journal 35(2). 387–416.Google Scholar
Orford, Anne & Florian Hoffmann
2016a Introduction: Theorizing international law. In Anne Orford & Florian Hoffmann (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the theory of international law, 1–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(eds.) 2016b The Oxford handbook of the theory of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reisman, Michael W. & Chris T. Antoniou
1994 The laws of war: A comprehensive collection of primary documents on international laws governing armed conflict. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael
1992 Just and unjust wars: A moral argument with historical illustrations (2nd edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, Max
2004 The vocation lectures. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Lukin, Annabelle & Rodrigo Araujo e Castro
2022. The Macquarie Laws of War Corpus (MQLWC): Design, Construction and Use. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 35:5 ► pp. 2167 ff. DOI logo
Lukin, Annabelle & Alexandra García Marrugo
2024. War in law: A corpus linguistic study of the lexical item war in the laws of war. Applied Corpus Linguistics 4:1 ► pp. 100088 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.