Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.145–170

Ways of meaning

A case study of two oncologists’ answers to questions asked by advanced cancer patients and their companions

ORCID logo | Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool Hospital, NSW Australia | Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of NSW, NSW Australia
ORCID logo | University of Wollongong, NSW Australia
ORCID logo | Macquarie University, NSW Australia
This paper explores one aspect of the operationalisation of a patient-centred ideology of care by examining an oncologist’s answers to questions asked by her patient and his companion during a palliative oncology consultation and comparing her answers to the markedly different answers of another oncologist. Halliday’s concept of register and Hasan’s semantic networks are used to examine the oncologists’ answers. Patients’ questions create the semiotic environment for clinicians to provide the information patients need for informed decision-making – an important aspect of patient-centredness. The answers clinicians provide construe their position towards this ideology of care. Findings suggest that one way patient-centredness can be operationalised, at the level of semantics, is through providing elaborated answers that explicitly display the reasoning employed by the oncologist.
Keywords: answer, cancer care, healthcare communication, ideology of care, oncology, palliative care, patient-centred care, question, register, relation enactment, semantic networks, semantics, systemic functional linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A register analysis of oncology consultation
  • 3.A brief review of work on semantic networks in Hallidayan SFL
  • 4.Hasan’s semantic networks
  • 5.Oncology consultation from round about: a case study of two oncologists, two patients with advanced incurable cancer and their companions
    • 5.1The context of Yvette’s consultations
    • 5.2Differential selection of semantic options in answers to [confirm] questions
    • 5.3Differential selections of semantic options in [specify] answers
    • 5.4Rationality, elaboration and relatedness: Semantic realisations of a patient-centred ideology of care
  • Ethics approval
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 January 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00024.kar
References (46)
References
Bernstein, Basil. 1971. Class, codes and control, volume I: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routlege & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Class, codes and control, volume IV: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cherny, Nathan I. & Stein Kaasa. 2015. The oncologist’s role in delivering palliative care. In Nathan I. Cherny, Marie Fallon, Stein Kaasa, Russell K. Portenoy & David C. Currow (eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative medicine (5th edition), 749–764. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chu, Celine P. Y. 2011. Picture book reading in a new arrival context: a multimodal perspective on teaching reading. Adelaide: University of Adelaide PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Cloran, Carmel. 1989. Learning through language: The social construction of gender. In Ruqaiya Hasan & James R. Martin (eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 111–151. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1994. Rhetorical units and decontextualisation: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning and grammar. (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics). Nottingham: University of Nottingham PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
. 2000. Socio-semantic variation: Different wordings, different meanings. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Researching language in schools and communities: Functional linguistic perspectives, 152–183. London & New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
Fung, Andy. 2016. Hasan’s semantic networks revisited: A Cantonese systemic functional approach. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 115–140. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Philip. 2004. Prone to distortion? Undue reliance on unreliable records in NSW Police Service formal interview model. In John Gibbons, V. Prakasam, K. V. Tirumalesh & Hemalatha Nagrajan (eds.), Language in the law, 44–81. New Delhi: Orient Longman Private Limited.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985. Part A. In Michael A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan (eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a aocial-aemiotic Perspective, 3–49. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
2002 [1977]. Text as semantic choice in social context. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Linguistic studies of text and discourse, volume 2 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 23–81. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2003 [1973]. Towards a sociological semantics. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 223–354. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007 [2002]. Applied linguistics as an evolving theme. In Michael A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 1–19. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1983. A semantic network for the analysis of messages in everyday talk between mothers and their children. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
. 1996. Semantic networks: A tool for the analysis of meaning. In Carmel Cloran, David G. Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning: Selected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, 104–131. London & New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
. 2009 [1988]. Language in the processes of socialisation: Home and school. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 119–179. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009 [1989]. Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 180–230. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009 [1991]. Questions as a mode of learning in everyday talk. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 231–268. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equibox.Google Scholar
. 2009a [1992]. Meaning in sociolinguistic theory. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 271–308. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009b [1992]. Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 309–352. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2009c. Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2013. Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. In Lise Fontaine (ed.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 269–299. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. Functional Linguistics 1(9). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016 [2014]. Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions, and semantics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Context in the system and process of language, volume 4 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 389–469. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. Sheffield & Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya, Carmel Cloran, Geoff Williams & Annabelle Lukin. 2007. Semantic networks: The description of meaning in SFL. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspectivev (volume 21), 697–738. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Jordens, Christopher. 2018. After dominance: The elastic politics of medicine. In Kathleen Montgomery & Wendy Lipworth (eds.), Medical professionals: Conflicts and quandaries in medical practice, 107–124. New York & Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, Neda, Annabelle Lukin, Alison R. Moore, Adam R. Walczak & Phyllis N. Butow. 2018. Advanced cancer patients’ construction of self during oncology consultations: A transitivity concordance analysis. Functional Linguistics 5(6). 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karimi, Neda, Alison R. Moore & Annabelle Lukin. 2018. Cancer care as an integrated practice, consultations between an oncologist and patients with advanced, incurable cancer. In Lise Fontaine & Akila Sellami-Baklouti (eds.), Perspectives from systemic functional lnguistics, 317–339. New York & Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle. 2012a. Evaluating questions in journalism: A case study of the Australian public broadcaster’s coverage of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice 9(1). 127–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Hasan’s semantic network as a tool in discourse analysis. In John Knox (ed.), To boldly proceed: Papers from the 39th international systemic functional congress, 141–146. Sydney: ISFC Organizing Committee.Google Scholar
Lukin, Annabelle, Alison R. Moore, Maria Herke, Rebekah Wegener & Canzhong Wu. 2011. Halliday’s model of register revisited and explored. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2). 187–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maley, Yon & Rhondda Fahey. 1991. Presenting the evidence: Constructions of reality in court. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 4(1). 3–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian. M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 221–292. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2012. Systemic functional linguistics as appliable linguistics: Social accountability and critical approaches. DELTA: Documentação de estudos em lingüística teórica e aplicada 281(Sps). 435–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Annabelle Lukin, David G. Butt, Chris Cleirigh & Chris Nesbitt. 2005. A case study of multistratal analysis. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 191. 123–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Alison R. 2016a. Can semantic networks capture intra-and inter-registerial variation? Palliative care discourse interrogates Hasan’s message semantics. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 83–114. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016b. Lovers, wrestlers, surgeons: A contextually sensitive approach to modelling body alignment and interpersonal engagement in surgical teams. In Sarah J. White & John A. Cartmill (eds.), Communication in surgical practice, 257–285. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2017. Register analysis in systemic functional linguistics. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 418–437. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Language and medicine. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 651–688. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, Terry. 1988. Systemic text generation as problem solving. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, Geoffrey J. 1973. Social class and children’s language of control at age five and age seven. In Basil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes and control, volume II: Applied studies towards a sociology of language, 135–201. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wake, Barbara J. 2006. Dialogic learning in tutorial talk: A case study of semiotic mediation as a learning resource for second language international students. Adelaide: University of Adelaide PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff. 1995. Joint book-reading and literacy pedagogy: A socio-semantic examination. Sydney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
. 2001. Literacy pedagogy prior to schooling: Relations between social positioning and semantic variation. In Basil Bernstein, Ana Morais, Isabel Neves, Brian Davies & Harry Daniels (eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research, 17–45. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2005. Semantic variation. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (volume 11), 457–480. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & Moslem Yousefi
2022. Systemic functional linguistics as a resource for teacher education and writing development. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 4:1 ► pp. 114 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.