Article published in:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 4:1 (2022) ► pp. 146157
References
Berry, Margaret
1975An introduction to systemic linguistics: I. Structures and systems. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
1977An introduction to systemic linguistics: II. Levels and links. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
1979A note on Sinclair and Coulthard’s classes of acts including a comment on comments. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 81. 49–59.Google Scholar
1981aSystemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Malcolm Coulthard & Martin Montgomery (eds.), Studies in discourse analysis, 120–145. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1981bTowards layers of exchange structure for directive exchanges. Network 21. 23–32.Google Scholar
1981cPolarity, ellipticity and propositional development: Their relevance to the well-formedness of an exchange. (A discussion of Coulthard and Brazil’s classes of move.) Nottingham Linguistic Circular 101. 36–63.Google Scholar
1995Thematic options and success in writing. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 55–84. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1996What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Margaret Berry, Christophe Butler, Robin Fawcett & Guowen Huang (eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language. Studies for Michael Halliday, 1–64. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
2013aContentful and contentlight subject themes in informal spoken English and formal written English. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bTowards a study of the differences between formal written English and informal spoken English. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice, 365–383. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016aDynamism in exchange structure. English Text Construction 91. 33–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016bOn describing contexts of situation. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society, 184–205. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017aStratum, delicacy, realisation and rank. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 4–14. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017bChallenging moves and supporting moves in discourse. In Stella Neumann, Rebekah Wegener, Jennifer Fest, Paula Niemietz & Nicole Hutzen (eds.), Challenging boundaries in linguistics: Systemic functional perspectives, 255–280. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2019The clause: An overview of the lexicogrammar from part I – SFL: the model. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schonthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of SFL, 92–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2021Inequalities in status: how do they show in discourse and what can be done about them. Lingua 2611. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Florence
1994From writer roles to elements of text: Interactive, organisational and topical. In Leila Barbara, Mike Scott & Antonieta Celani (eds.), Reflections on language learning, 170–183. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
1997Marked Theme as a heuristic for analysing text-type, text and genre. In Jordi Pique & David J. Viera (eds.), Applied languages: Theory and practice in ESP, 45–71. Universitat de Valencia: Servei de Publications.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristen
2021Exchanging propositions in the epistemic domain and actions in the deontic domain. Symposium #5: Roundtable in honour of Margaret Berry. ESFLC 2021. September 16. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristen, Lise Fontaine & Miriam Taverniers
2019Introduction. Functions of Language 26 (1). 5–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P.
1980Cognitive linguistics and social interaction: Towards an integrated model of a systemic functional grammar and other components of a communicating mind. Heidelberg: Julius Groos & Exeter University.Google Scholar
2010Alternative architectures for systemic functional linguistics: How do we choose? Discussions in functional approaches to language. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise & Anne McCabe
2021Conversations with Margaret Berry on class, type and categories. Symposium #5: Roundtable in honour of Margaret Berry. ESFLC 2021, September 16. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise & David Schönthal
2019The rooms of the house: Grammar at group rank. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 118–141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forey, Gail
2004Workplace texts: Do they mean the same for teachers and business people? English for Specific Purposes 23(4). 447–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Projecting clauses: Interpersonal realisation of control and power in workplace texts. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 151–174. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2021Bridging theory and impact on learning: The explicit teaching of Theme and Rheme in primary schools. Symposium #5: Roundtable in honour of Margaret Berry. ESFLC 2021, September 16. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Forey, Gail & Geoff Thompson
(eds.) 2009Text type and texture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter
1995aA personal view of Theme. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 1–19. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1995bThemes, methods of development, and texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective, 317–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The textual metafunction as a site for a discussion of the goals of a linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 70–93. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena
2004Four critical features of teacher-guided reporting in infant science and literacy contexts. Language and Education 18 (5). 361–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Centre-stage in the instructional register: Partnership talk in primary EAL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 9 (4). 476–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Transforming talk and phonics practice: Or, how do crabs clap? TESOL Quarterly 421. 261–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Sheena & Aizen B. T. Yaacob
2009CD-ROM multimodal affordances: Classroom interaction perspectives in the Malaysian English literacy hour. Language and Education. 23 (5). 409–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1959The language of the Chinese “Secret History of the Mongols”. Publications of the Philological Society XVII. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
1961Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17 (2). 241–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte, Kristin Davidse & Gerard O’Grady
2019English tag questions eliciting knowledge or action: A comparison of the speech function and exchange structure models. Functions of Language 26 (1). 86–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R.
1992Theme, method of development in existentiality: the price of reply. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 61. 147–184.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2007Working with discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R., Michelle Zappavinga & Paul Dwyer
2009Negotiating shame: Exchange and genre structure in youth justice conferencing. In Ahmar Mahboob & Caroline Liposkvy (eds.), Studies in applied linguistics and language learning, 41–72. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Martinez-Insua & Ana Elina
2017On the contentfulness of Themes in English historical medical texts. In Stella Neumann, Rebekah Wegener, Jennifer Fest, Paula Niemietz & Nicole Hützen (eds.), Challenging boundaries in linguistics: Systemic functional perspectives, 111–132. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2019Scientific writing and contentfulness of Subject Themes: How science was explained to (lay) audiences. Journal of Pragmatics 1381. 216–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M.
1992Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–81. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Sarah-Jane
2016Children’s meaning making in classroom role-play at 4–5 years: A systemic functional linguistic investigation. PhD Unpublished. The Open University, England.
Mukherjee, Sarah-Jane & Margaret Berry
2021Problems of analysis in work on exchange structure. Symposium #5: Roundtable in honour of Margaret Berry. ESFLC 2021, September 16. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Rose, David
2014Analysing pedagogic discourse: An approach from genre and register. Functional Linguistics. 1 (11). 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John & Malcolm Coulthard
1975Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2021Speech function and mood as seen through metafunctional fractals. Symposium #5: Roundtable in honour of Margaret Berry. ESFLC 2021, September 16. Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija
1987The structure of social interaction. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Wickens, Paul
2000Computer-based learning and changing legal pedagogical orders of discourse in UK higher education: A comparative critical discourse analysis of the TLTP materials in Law. PhD dissertation. University of Warwick, England. Available at http://​wrap​.warwick​.ac​.uk​/4030/
Zappavinga, Michelle & James R. Martin
2018Discourse and diversionary justice: An analysis of youth justice conferencing. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar