Review published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 4:1 (2022) ► pp.182196
References
Accurso, Kathryn & Meg Gebhard
2021SFL praxis in U.S. teacher education: A critical literature review. Language and Education 35 (5). 402–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloor, Thomas & Meriel Bloor
2013The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach (3rd edition). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1973Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Richard K. Brown (ed.), Knowledge, education, and cultural change, 71–84. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S.
Butt, David, Rhondda Fahey, Susan Feez & Sue Spinks
2012Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Heidi
Clark, Urszula
2019Developing language and literacy in English across the secondary school curriculum: An inclusive approach. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffin, Caroline, Jim Donohue & Sarah North
2009Exploring English grammar: From formal to functional. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Oliveira, Luciana C. & Mary J. Schleppegrell
2015Focus on grammar and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feez, Susan
1999Text-based syllabus design. TESOL in Context 9 (1). 11–14.Google Scholar
Freire, Paolo
1993Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena
2017Systemic functional linguistics and genre studies. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), The Routledge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 473–488. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gebhard, Meg
2019Teaching and researching ELLs’ disciplinary literacies: Systemic functional linguistics in action in the context of U.S. school reform. London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1994An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harman, Ruth
(ed.) 2019Bilingual learners and social equity: Critical approaches to systemic functional linguistics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1996Literacy, everyday talk and society. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Geoff Williams (eds.), Literacy in society, 377–424. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Sally & Lucy Macnaught
2016Functional language instruction and the writing growth of English language learners in the middle years. TESOL Quarterly 50 (4). 792–816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H. & Graham Lock
2011Functional grammar in the ESL classroom: Noticing, exploring and practising. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary
1996Literacy and learning across the curriculum: Towards a model of register from secondary school teachers. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Geoff Williams (eds.), Literacy in society, 232–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohan, Bernard A.
1986Language and content. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Moore, Jason & Mary J. Schleppegrell
2014Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English language arts. Linguistics and Education 261. 92–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
New London Group
1996A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review 66 (1). 60–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Tajino, Akira
(ed.) 2018A new approach to English pedagogical grammar: The order of meanings. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, Jonathan J.
2015Understanding verbal art: A functional linguistic approach. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R., Guiseppe Mammone & David Caldwell
2015Linguistically based inequality, multilingual education and a genre-based literacy development pedagogy: Insights from the Australian experience. Language and Education 29 (3). 256–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar