References (61)
References
Armstrong, Elizabeth, Alison Ferguson, Lynne Mortensen & Leanne Togher. 2005. Acquired language disorders: Some functional insights. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, volume 1, 383–412. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bodmer, Frederick. 1943. The loom of language: A guide to foreign languages for the home student. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Cao, Xueqin. 2001. A dream of red mansions. Translated by Yang Xianyi & Gladys Yang. Paris: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances & J. R. Martin. 1997. Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances & Len Unsworth. 2005. Developing dimensions of an educational linguistics. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, volume 1, 217–250. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances. 1990.Google Scholar
Cloran, Carmel. 1994. Rhetorical units and decontextualization: An enquiry into some relations of context, meaning and grammar. Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6. Nottingham: University of Nottingham Department of English Studies.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the human brain. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. 1957. A synopsis of linguistic theory, 1930–1955. Studies in linguistic analysis. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Reprinted in Frank R. Palmer (ed.), Selected papers of J.R. Firth 1952–1959, 165–208. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter H. 1995a. Themes, methods of development, and texts. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter H. Fries (eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective, 317–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995b. Patterns of information in initial position in English. In Peter H. Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic functional perspectives. Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 47–66. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Ghadessy, Mohsen (ed.). 1999. Text and context in functional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael. 1987. Metafunctions: Aspects of their development, status and use in systemic linguistics. In M. A. K. Halliday & Robin P. Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics, vol. 1: Theory and description, 94–106. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1975. Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1985. Spoken and written language. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
1992. Systemic grammar and the concept of a “science of language”. Waiguoyu (Journal of Foreign Languages) 2 (General Series no. 78). 1–9. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday, On language and linguistics, volume 3 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 199–212. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1998a. Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London: Routledge. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday, The language of science, volume 5 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 49–101. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1998b. Computing meanings: Some reflections on past experience and present prospects. Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (ed.). Chinese translated by Wu Canzhong. Japanese translated by Kazuhiro Teruya. Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday, Computational and quantitative studies, volume 6 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 239–267. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Zoe L. James. 1993. A quantitative study of polarity and primary tense in the English finite clause. In John M. Sinclair, Michael Hoey & Gwyneth Fox (eds.), Techniques of description: Spoken and written discourse. London & New York: Routledge. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday, Computational and quantitative studies, volume 6 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 93–129. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London & Washington DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1980. What’s going on?: A dynamic view of context in language. In James. E. Copeland & Philip. W. Davis (eds.), The Seventh LACUS Forum, 106–121. Columbia: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
. 1985a. Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
. 1985b. Lending and borrowing: From grammar to lexis. In John E. Clark (ed.), The cultivated Australian: A festschrift for Arthur Delbridge. Hamburg: Helmut Buske. Reprinted in Ruqaiya Hasan, Describing language: Form and function, volume 5 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 174–184. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 1987. The grammarian’s dream: Lexis as most delicate grammar. In M. A. K. Halliday & Robin P. Fawcett (eds.), New developments in systemic linguistics, vol. 1: Theory and description, 184–212. Reprinted in Carmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoff Williams (eds.), Ways of saying, ways of meaning, 73–103. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
. 1996. Ways of saying, ways of meaning. Edited by Carmel Cloran, David Butt & Geoffrey Williams. London & New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
. 2005. Private pleasure, public discourse: Reflections on engaging with literature. In Donna Miller & Monica Turci (eds.), Language and verbal art revisited: Linguistic approaches to verbal art, 13–40. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 2007[1989]. Semantic variation and sociolinguistics. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 91. 221–276. Reprinted in Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 180–230. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.). 2005. Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, vol. 1. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hughart, Barry. 1989. The story of the stone. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1994. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1989. Technicality and abstraction: Language for the creation of specialized texts. In Frances Christie (ed.), Writing in schools: Reader. Geelong: Deakin University Press. Reprinted in Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 203–220. London & Washington DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 221–267. London & Washington DC: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal systems in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Ruth Wodak. (eds.). 2003. Re/reading the past: Critical functional perspectives on time and value. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. THEME as enabling resource in ideational knowledge construction. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 20–54. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1999. The system of TRANSITIVITY: An exploratory study of text-based profiles. Functions of Language 6(1). 1–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. The architecture of grammar according to the systemic functional theory of language. New Delhi: Decent Books.Google Scholar
McMullen, Alistair & James L. Williams 1971. On course mathematics. 1, An introduction to algebra and geometry. 3rd ed. South Melbourne: Macmillan of Australia.Google Scholar
Pearce, John J., Geoffrey Thornton & David Mackay. 1989. The programme in Linguistics and English Teaching, University College London 1964–1971. In Ruqaiya Hasan & J. R. Martin (eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture. Meaning and Choice in Language: Studies for Michael Halliday. Vol. XXVII in Advances in Discourse Processes, 329–368. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1959. Language as particle, wave and field. Texas Quarterly 21. 37–55.Google Scholar
Priestley, John B. 1948–1950. The plays of J.B. Priestley, vols. I–III1. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Rose, Steven R. 1992. The making of memory. London: Bantam Press.Google Scholar
Shum, Mark. 2003. The functions of language and the teaching of Chinese: Application of systemic functional linguistics to Chinese language education. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul. 2004. Brain, mind and the signifying body: An ecosocial semiotic theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1945. Grammatical categories. Language 21. 1–11. Reprinted in Benjamin L. Whorf. Language, thought and reality. Edited by John B. Carroll. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M. I. T. Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff. 2005. Grammatics in schools. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), 2005. Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, vol. 11, 281–310. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff & Annabelle Lukin. 2004. The development of language: Functional perspectives on species and individuals. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Addendum
Some introductions to (systemic) functional grammar
1. Bloor, Thomas & Merial Bloor. 1995. The Functional Analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. ISBN 0-340-60012-8 London: Arnold (2nd edition Arnold, 2004.) Google Scholar
2. Butt, David; Rhondda Fahey, Sue Spinks & Colin Yallop. 1995. Using Functional Grammar: An explorer’s guide. Macquarie University: NCELTR (National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research) ISBN 1-86408-044-2Google Scholar
3. Coffin, Caroline; Ann Hewings & Kieran O⇔halloran (eds). 2004. Applying English Grammar: functional and corpus approaches. London: Arnold ISBN 978-0340885147Google Scholar
4. Eggins, Suzanne. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London & New York: Pinter ISBN (hb) 1-85567-208-1 / ISBN (pb) 1-85567-209-X.Google Scholar
5. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold isbn 0-340-57491-7 3rd edition, revised by Christian Matthiessen, Arnold, 2004 ISBN 0-340-76167-9Google Scholar
6. Lock, Graham. 1995. Functional English Grammar: an introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ISBN 0-521-45922-2Google Scholar
7. Martin, J. R., Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Clare Painter. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Arnold ISBN 0-340-65250-0Google Scholar
8. Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 1995. Lexico-grammatical Cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Science Publishers ISBN 4-87718-002-8Google Scholar
9. Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold ISBN 0-340-62535-X 2nd edition, Arnold, 2004 ISBN 0-340-80716-4Google Scholar