References (37)
References
Bernstein, Basil. 197l. Class, codes and control, Vol. 1: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. (Primary Socialization, Language and Education). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1973. Class, codes and control, Vol. 2: Applied studies towards a sociology of language. (Primary Socialization, Language and Education). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1990. Class, codes and control, Vol. 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Birch, David & O’Toole, Michael (eds.). 1985. Functions of style. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
Butt, David. 1989. The object of language. In Ruqaiya Hasan & J. R. Martin (eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture: Meaning and choice in language, Vol. I1, 66–110. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances. 1988. Curriculum genres.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne, Peter Wignell & J. R. Martin. 1987. The discourse of history: Distancing the recoverable past. Writing Project Report 1987 (Linguistics Department, University of Sydney, Working Papers in Linguistics 5), 66–116.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967/68. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. 3(2). 199–244. 3(3). 179–215. Reprinted in M.A.K. Halliday, Studies in English language, volume 7 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 5–109. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
1976. The teacher taught the student English: An essay in applied linguistics. In Peter A. Reich (ed.), The Second LACUS Forum, Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press. Reproduced in M. A. K. Halliday, Studies in English language, volume 7 in the collected works of M.A.K.Halliday, 297–305. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
1993. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 51. 93–116. Reproduced in M. A. K. Halliday, The language of early childhood, volume 4 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 327–352. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
2007 [1989], Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 354–367. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya (ed.). 1985a. Discourse on discourse. Canberra: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia (Occasional Paper 7).Google Scholar
. 1985b. Linguistics, language and verbal art. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press. Reissued Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
. 1988. Language in the processes of socialization: Home and school. In Linda Gerot, Jane Oldenburg & Theo van Leeuwen (eds.), Language and socialization: Home and school: Papers from the Working Conference on Language in Education, Macquarie University 17–21 November 1986. Sydney: Macquarie University School of English and Linguistics. Reproduced in Ruqaiya Hasan, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics, volume 2 in the collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan, 119–179. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya & Carmel Cloran. 1990. Semantic variation: A sociolinguistic interpretation of everyday talk between mothers and children. In M. A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.), Learning, keeping and using language: Selected papers from the Eighth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney, August 1987, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya & J. R. Martin. (eds.). 1989. Language development: Learning language, learning culture: Meaning and choice in language, Vol. I1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 2005. The collected works of Ruqaiya Hasan Vol. 2, Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Terry Threadgold. 1988. Towards a social theory of genre. Southern Review 211, 215–243.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L. 1984. Semiotics and education. Toronto Semiotic Circle Monographs, Working Papers & Prepublications 1984.2. Toronto: Victoria College, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
1989. Semantics and social values. Word 40(1–2). 37–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1990. Technical discourse and technocratic ideology. In M. A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.), Learning, keeping and using language: Selected papers from the Eighth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney 16–21 August 1987, Vol. 21, 435–460. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1984a. Language, register and genre. In Frances Christie (ed.), Children writing: Reader, 21–30. Geelong: Deakin University Press (ECT 418: Language studies: Children writing).Google Scholar
1984b. Types of writing in infants and primary school. In Len Unsworth (ed.), Reading, writing and spelling: Proceedings of the fifth Macarthur Reading/Language Symposium, 34–55. Sydney: Macarthur Institute of Higher Education. Republished in Bill Cope (ed.). 1991. Working with Genre: Papers from the 1989 LERN conference, 33–44. University of Technology, Sydney, 25–26 November 1989. Sydney: Common Ground.Google Scholar
1988. Grammatical conspiracies in Tagalog: Family, face and fate. In James D. Benson, Michael J. Cummings & William S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective, 243–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In Eija Ventola (ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses, 307–338. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1991. Language on language: The grammar of semiosis. Social Semiotics 1.21. 69–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. Interpreting the textual metafunction. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 37–81. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
McGregor, William P. 1990. The linguistic construction of the racial other. In M. A. K. Halliday, John Gibbons & Howard Nicholas (eds.), Learning, keeping and using language: Selected papers from the Eighth World Congress of Applied Linguistics, Sydney 16–21 August 1987, Vol 21., 175–188. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Toole, Michael. 1989. Semiotic systems in painting and poetry. In M. Falchikov et al. (eds.), A festschrift for Dennis Ward. Nottingham: Astra.Google Scholar
Painter, Clare & J. R. Martin. (eds.). 1986. Writing to mean: Teaching genres across the curriculum, Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Occasional Paper 9.Google Scholar
Poynton, Cate. 1985. Language and gender: Making the difference. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press (reissued Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul J. I991. Social semiotics as praxis: Text, social meaning making and Nabokov’s ‘Ada’. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Threadgold, Terry. 1988a. The genre debate. Southern Review 21(3).Google Scholar
. 1988b. Stories of race and gender: an unbounded discourse. In David Birch & Michael O’Toole (eds.), Functions of style, 169–204. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
. 1991. Postmodernism, systemic-functional linguistics as metalanguage and the practice of cultural critique. In Frances Christie & Elwyn Jenkins (eds.). Social processes in education: Proceedings of the First Australian Systemic Network Conference, Deakin University, January 1990. Geelong: Deakin University.Google Scholar
Threadgold, Terry, Elisabeth Grosz, Gunther Kress & M. A. K. Halliday (eds.). 1986. Semiotics, ideology, language, Sydney Studies in Society & Culture 3. Sydney: Sydney Association for Studies in Society and Culture.Google Scholar