Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Context and Text
Vol. 3:2 (2021) ► pp.274–301

Language in action

Sport, mode and the division of semiotic labour

ORCID logo | Australian Catholic University , Australia | The University of Sydney , Australia
ORCID logo | The University of South Australia , Australia
ORCID logo | The University of Sydney , Australia
This paper explores language in sport. It draws on systemic functional linguistics to map variations in language as coaches and players change situation, from setting up drills and giving feedback to calling for the ball during the intensity of play. In particular, it explores grammatical and phonological shifts as coaches and players move more toward the ‘language–in–action’ pole of mode. It shows that the more language is used in relation to intense action on the field, the less this meaning is given by the ‘higher levels’ of language (both its higher strata and higher ranks) and the more meaning that is given by the ‘lower levels’ (lower strata and lower ranks). In terms of strata this shifts meaning from the higher stratum of lexicogrammar to the lower stratum of phonology; in terms of rank, this breaks down clause structures to rely heavily on group/phrase and word choices and flattens phonological patterns of intonation, rhythm and syllable structures to rely more on voice quality and timing. This paper thus maps a rich space of registerial variation with significant deviations from typical English patterns.
Keywords: systemic functional linguistics (SFL), mode, register, sport, volleyball, Australian Rules Football, lexicogrammar, sound semiotics, phonology, intonation, rhythm, voice quality, discourse analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Communication in sport
  • 3.Language in action: Grammar
    • 3.1Setting up a drill
    • 3.2Giving feedback
  • 4.Language in action – phonology
    • 4.1Intonation
    • 4.2Rhythm
    • 4.3Syllable structure
    • 4.4Voice quality and timing
  • 6.Language in action
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.20009.dor
References (48)
References
Abercrombie, David. 1965. Studies in phonetics and linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenik. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from [URL]
Bowcher, Wendy L. 2003. Speaker contributions in radio sports commentary. Text & Talk 23(4). 445–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Adam. 2014. Pronunciation and phonetics: A practical guide for English language teachers. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruce, Toni. 2013. Reflections on communication and sport: On women and femininities. Communication & Sport 1 (1–2). 125–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, David. 2009a. ‘Working your words’: Appraisal in the AFL post–match interview. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 32 (2). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Making metre mean: Identity and affiliation in the rap music of Kanye West. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation, 59–80. London: Continuum, London.Google Scholar
. 2014a. The interpersonal voice: Applying appraisal to the rap and sung voice. Social Semiotics 24 (1). 40–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. A comparative analysis of rapping and singing: Perspectives from systemic phonology, social semiotics and music studies. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Bradley Smith (eds.), Recent studies in systemic phonology, volume I: Focus on the English language, 271–299. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Caldwell, David, John Walsh, Elaine W. Vine & Jon Jureidini. 2016. Discourse, linguistics, sport and the academy. In David Caldwell, John Walsh, Elaine W. Vine & Joe Jureidini (eds.), The discourse of sport: Analyses from social linguistics, 1–12. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, David, Nayia Cominos & Katie Gloede. 2017. My words, my literacy: Tracking of and teaching through the on–field language of Australian Indigenous boys. Boyhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal 10 (2). 11–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caple, Helen, Kate Greenwood & Catharine Lumby. 2011. What league? The representations of female athletes in Australian television sports coverage. Media International Australia 140 (1). 137–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cominos, Nayia, David Caldwell & Katie Gloede. 2019. Brotherhood and belonging: Mapping the on–field identities of Aboriginal youth. In Sadia Habib & Michael Ward (eds.), Youth, place and theories of belonging, 92–109. Routledge, London. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doran, Yaegan J. & James R. Martin. 2021. Field relations: Understanding scientific explanations. In Karl Maton, James R. Martin & Yaegan J. Doran (eds.), Teaching science: Knowledge, language, pedagogy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagleman, Andrea N. & Tywan G. Martin. 2013. Race portrayals in sport communication. In Paul M. Pedersen (ed.), Routledge handbook of sport communication, 369–377. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society 12 (2). 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gee, James P. 1990. Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1979. Differences between spoken and written language. Reprinted in M. A. K. Halliday, Language and education, volume 9 in the collected works of M.A.K. Halliday, 63–80. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum, 2007.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & Christian. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th edition). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1985. Language, context, text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. A. K. & William S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hao, Jing. 2020. Analysing scientific discourse from a systemic functional linguistic perspective: A framework for exploring knowledge-building in biology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1973. Code, register and social dialect. In Basil Bernstein (ed.), Class, codes and control, volume II, 253–292. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics. 219–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kassing, Jeffrey W. 2020. Messi hanging laundry at the Bernabéu: The production and consumption of internet sports memes as trash talk. Discourse, Context & Media 341. 100320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kowalikowa, Jadigwa. 2009. Language of sport in the context of communication and culture. Studies in Physical Culture and Tourism 16 (1). 63–67.Google Scholar
Lamont, Matthew & Andrew S. Ross. 2020. Deconstructing embedded meaning within cyclists’ Instagram discourse: #fromwhereiride. Annals of Leisure Research 23 (3). 339–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Semantic variation – Modelling realisation, instantiation and individuation in social semiosis. In Monika Bednarek & James R. Martin (eds.), New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimdality, identity and affiliation, 1–34. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Erika S. Matruglio. 2020. Revisiting mode: Context in/dependency in Ancient History classroom discourse. In James R. Martin, Karl Maton & Yaegan J. Doran (eds.), Accessing academic discourse: Systemic functional linguistics and legitimation code theory, 89–113. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter. R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maton, Karl. 2014. Knowledge and knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1993. Register in the round: Diversity in a unified theory of register analysis. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Register analysis: Theory and practice, 221–292. London: Edward before Arnold.Google Scholar
Meân, Lindsey & Kelby Halone. 2010. Sport, language, and culture: Issues and intersections. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29 (3). 253–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Messner, Michael. 2013. Reflections on communication and sport: On men and masculinities. Communication & Sport 1 (1–2). 113–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ngo, Thu, Susan Hood, James R. Martin, Claire Painter, Bradley Smith & Michele Zappavigna. 2021. Modelling paralanguage using systemic functional semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2020. Is there a role for prosody within register studies? And if so what and how? Language, Context and Text 2 (1). 59–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poynton, Cate. 1990. Address and the semiotics of social relations: A systemic–functional account of address forms and practices in Australian English. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, The University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Rose, David & James R. Martin. 2012. Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ross, Andrew S. & Damian J. Rivers. 2018. “Froome with his SKY bodyguard, layers of armour”: The ‘Sport is War’ conceptual metaphor in Grand Tour cycling commentary. Communication and Sport 7 (2). 176–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Andrew S. & Michele Zappavigna. 2020. My sport, my perspectives: Intersubjectivity in cyclist Instagram posts. Discourse, Context & Media 341. 100327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Serazio, Michael. 2010. When the sportswriters go marching in: Sports journalism, collective trauma, and memory metaphors. Critical Studies in Media Communication 271. 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorpe, Holly. 2017. Action sports, social media, and new technologies: Towards a research agenda. Communication & Sport 5 (5). 554–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tovares, Alla V. 2020. The public loneliness of endurance athletes: Creating ambient affiliation through involvement strategies on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media 341. 100380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1999. Speech, music, sound. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, John & Jon Jureidini. 2016. Language as a key resource for the football coach: A cast study of in–game coaching at one Australian Rules club. In David Caldwell, John Walsh, Elaine W. Vine & Jon Jureidini (eds.), The discourse of sport: Analyses from social linguistics, 13–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilton, Antje. 2017. The interactional construction of evaluation in post–match football interviews. In David Caldwell, John Walsh, Elaine W. Vine & Jon Jureidini (eds.), The discourse of sport: Analyses from social linguistics, 92–112. London: Routledge.Google Scholar