Article published in:
Language, Culture and Society
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp. 83–105

Authority and morality in advocating heteroglossia

| Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
In this article I address the fact that influential strands in socio- and applied linguistics advocate heteroglossic policies in education and other monolingually organised domains without extending this heteroglossia to public debate about language policy. Often this occurs by presenting linguistic diversity to relevant stakeholders as natural and real, or as the only option on account of its proven effectiveness. I argue that this strategy removes options from the debate by framing it as a scientific rather than political one, that it confronts stakeholders with academic pressure and blame, and that this may diminish scholars’ impact on policy making. Using examples from research on translanguaging, repertoires, and linguistic citizenship, I will suggest that scholars may be more effective in contexts of value conflict when their knowledge serves to expand rather than reduce the range of alternatives for stakeholders. Focusing on education I will then explore how we may reclaim language policy from an evidence-based discourse and address matters of value besides matters of fact.
Keywords: heteroglossia, authority, morality, translanguaging, repertoire, linguistic citizenship


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 12 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.00005.jas

Full-text

Authority and morality in advocating heteroglossia
References

[ p. 102 ]References

Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogical imagination (ed. by M. Holquist). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C.
(2003) Voices of modernity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, J.
(2015) Partnerships in research. In J. Snell, S. Shaw, & F. Copland (Eds.), Linguistic ethnography (pp. 207–224). Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A., & Coupland, N.
(2001) Dialogue. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biesta, G.
(2009) Good education in an age of measurement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Why ‘what works’ still won’t work. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29: 491–503. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Giving teaching back to education. Phenomenology and Practice, 6(2), 35–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biesta, G., & Osberg, D.
(2010) Complexity, education and politics from the inside-out and the outside-in. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 1–3). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Billig, M.
(1996) Arguing and thinking. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A.
(1988) Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Block, D.
(2018) The political economy of language education research (or the lack thereof). Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 15(4), 237–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J.
(1999) The debate is open. In J. Blommaert (Ed.), Language ideological debates (pp. 1–38). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Backus, A.
(2011) Repertoires revisited. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, 67.Google Scholar
Bruce Morton, J., & Harper, S. N.
(2007) What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10(6), 719–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C.
(1977) Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Cameron, D.
(2012) Verbal hygiene (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K.
(1992) Researching language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chun, E., & Lo, A.
(2016) Language and racialization. In N. Bonvillain (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 220–233). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooke, M., Bryers, D., & Wistanley, B.
(2018) ‘Our languages’. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, 234.Google Scholar
De Bruin, A., Treccani, B., & Della Sala, S.
(2014) Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias? Psychological Science, 26(1), 99–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Del Percio, A., Flubacher, M., & Duchêne, A.
(2016) Language and political economy. In O. García, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 55–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 103 ]
Erickson, F.
(1987) Transformation and school success. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(4), 335–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flores, N.
(2017) Developing a materialist anti-racist approach to language activism. Multilingua, 36(5), 565–570. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Flores, N.
(2012) Multilingual pedagogies. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism (pp. 232–246). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
García, O., & Hesson, S.
(2015) Translanguaging frameworks. In A. Yiakoumetti (Ed.), Multilingualism and language in education (pp. 221–241). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
García, O., & Li, W.
(2014) Translanguaging. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García, O., & Lin, A.
(2016) Translanguaging and bilingual education. In O. García, A. Lin, S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 117–130). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, O., Flores, N., & Woodley, H. H.
(2015) Constructing in-between spaces to ‘do’ bilingualism. In J. Cenoz & D. Gorter (Eds.), Multilingual education (pp. 199–224). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gardiner, M.
(2004) Wild publics and grotesque symposiums. The Sociological Review 52(1), 28–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M.
(2005) Is the evidence-based practice movement doing more good than harm? Evidence & Policy 1(1), 85–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The perils of ‘impact’ for academic social science. Contemporary Social Science 9(3), 345–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M.
(1999) Ebonics, language revival, la qualité de la langue and more. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(2), 260–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M., Pietikäinen, S., & Pujolar, J.
(2017) Critical sociolinguistic research methods. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M., & McElhinny, B.
(2017) Language, capitalism, colonialism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H., & Hill, K. C.
(1980) Mixed grammar, purist grammar, and language attitudes in modern Nahuatl. Language in Society, 9(3), 321–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hogan-Brun, G., Mar-Molinero, C., & Stevenson, P.
(Eds.) (2009) Discourses on language and integration. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A.
(1999) Ideologies in action. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Collaborative practice, linguistic anthropological enquiry and mediation between researcher and practitioner discourses. In S. Gardner & M. Martin-Jones (Eds.), Multilingualism, discourse and ethnography (pp. 334–352). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaspers, J.
(2016) (Dis)fluency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45, 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language & Communication, 58(1), 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaspers, J., & Van Hoof, S.
(2013) Hyperstandardization in Flanders. Extreme enregisterment and its aftermath. Pragmatics, 23(2), 331–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kompridis, N.
(2005) Normativizing hybridity/neutralizing culture. Political Theory, 33(3), 318–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 104 ]
Lefstein, A., & Snell, J.
(2011) Professional vision and the politics of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 505–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. C.
(2018) A critique of the principle of error correction as a theory of social change. Language in Society, 47, 325–384. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, Wei
(2016) Epilogue. In V. Cook & W. Li (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multicompetence (pp. 533–543). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Longino, H.
(2002) The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Masschelein, J., & Simons, M.
(2013) Defence of the school. Leuven: E-ducation, Culture and Society Publishers.Google Scholar
McNamara, T.
(2009) Language tests and social policy. In G. Hogan-Brun, C. Mar-Molinero, & P. Stevenson (Eds.), Discourses on language and integration (pp. 153–163). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R.
(2007) The sociology of knowledge and education. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W.
(2015) Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pielke, R. A.
(2007) The honest broker. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B.
(1997) Retuning in applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B., Cooke, M., & Holmes, S.
(2018) Promoting linguistic citizenship. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, 233.Google Scholar
Salö, L.
(2017) Sociolinguistics and epistemic reflexivity. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, 206.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M.
(1985) Language and the culture of gender. In E. Mertz & R. J. Parmentier (Eds.), Semiotic mediation (pp. 219–259). New York, NY: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, A.
(2007) Survival of the ideas that fit. Social Policy & Society, 6(1), 25–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C.
(2001) African mother-tongue programmes and the politics of language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 22(4), 339–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C., & Heugh, K.
(2004) Linguistic human rights and linguistic citizenship. In D. Patrick & J. Freeland (Eds.), Language rights and language survival (pp. 191–218). Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Woolard, K. A.
(1989) Double talk. Bilingualism and the politics of ethnicity in Catalonia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wynne, B.
(1993) Public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 321–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 105 ]
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Brooks, Emma
2021. Translanguaging Health. Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
García, Ofelia
2020.  In Inclusion, Education and Translanguaging [Inklusion und Bildung in Migrationsgesellschaften, ], ► pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo
Imre Heltai, János
2021. Translanguaging as a rhizomatic multiplicity. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.