Cover not available
Article published In:
Language, Epistemology, and the Politics of Knowledge Production
Edited by Alfonso Del Percio, Patricia Baquedano-López, Miguel Pérez-Milans and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Language, Culture and Society 3:2] 2021
► pp. 154–179
Special issue articles

Transcription as embodied entextualization

Process, transformation, authority

| Brooklyn College CUNY

This article analyzes transcription as a form of knowledge production, distinguishing between the role of transcription as a tool and the contingent nature of transcription as a process. It uses the lens of embodied entextualization, or the culturally specific ways bodies are incorporated into as well as produce texts (Cavanaugh 2017), to illuminate the interdiscursive process of transcription and how it is shaped by social factors such as race, gender, politics, and class. I do so by presenting and analyzing text-objects from my own research on language ideologies and language shift in northern Italy at various stages of entextualization, highlighting the multiple choices that shape transcription and how such choices are in turn shaped by a number of factors often invisible in the final, or at least public, versions of these texts that circulate the most widely. Transcripts such as the ones I discuss endure as evidence, in published and other forms, even as intertextual gaps punctuate their interdiscursive reproduction across instantiations. This work raises questions about the role of transcripts as evidence, their authority, and their varying ontological statuses as text objects in order to further conversations about how scholarship about language in use may be reflexively undertaken.

Keywords: knowledge production, transcription, interdiscursivity, embodied entexualization, Italy, evidence
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Transcription as interdiscursivity in action
  • 3.Practicing transcription: Bodies in context
  • 4.Transcription-as-process
  • 5.Transcription-as-product
  • 6.Concluding reflections
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lcs.20021.cav
References
Abu-Lughod, L.
(1990) The Romance of resistance. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L.
(1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 191, 59–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bear, L., Ho, K., Tsing, A., & Yanagisako, S.
(2015) Gens: A feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Cultural Anthropology Website. [URL] (accessed April 30, 2021).
Berruto, G.
(1987) L’italiano regionale Bergamasco. In G. Sanga (ed.), Lingua e dialetti di Bergamo e delle Valli (pp. 499–592). Bergamo: Pierluigi Lubrina Editore.Google Scholar
Briggs, C. L. & Bauman, R.
(1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M.
(2000) The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1439–1465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, J. R.
(2009) Living memory: The social aesthetics of language in a northern Italian town. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Entering into politics: Interdiscursivity, register, stance, and vernacular in northern Italy. Language in Society, 41(1), 73–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017) The blacksmith’s feet: Embodied entextualization in northern Italian vernacular poetry. Representations Special Issue, “Language-in-use and the literary artifact,” 1371, 68–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Debenport, E.
(2015) Fixing the books: Secrecy, literacy, and perfectability in indigenous New Mexico. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research.Google Scholar
Dick, H. P.
(2010) Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist, 37(2), 275–290. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A.
(2006) Transcripts, like shadows on a wall. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(4), 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenlohr, P.
(2017) Transduction in religious discourse: Vocalization and sound reproduction in Mauritian Muslim devotional practices. In J. R. Cavanaugh & S. Shankar (Eds.), Language and materiality: Theoretical and ethnographic explorations, 144–161. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flores, N. & Rosa, J.
(2015) Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2),149–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gal, S.
(1991) Between speech and silence: The problematics of research on language and gender. In M. di Leonardo (ed.), Gender at the crossroads of knowledge (pp. 175–203). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. E.
(2002) Writing empire, underwriting nation: Discursive histories of Kabyle Berber oral texts. American Ethnologist, 29(1), 86–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, K. & Cavanaugh, J. R.
(2019) Introduction. Vital topics forum: What happened to social facts? American Anthropologist, 121(1)160–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inoue, M.
(2003) The listening subject of Japanese modernity and his auditory double: Citing, sighting, and siting the modern Japanese woman. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 156–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Stenography and ventriloquism in late nineteenth century Japan. Language and Communication, 311, 181–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, J. T.
(1996) Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. M. Silverstein & G. Urban (Eds.). Natural histories of discourse (pp.131–159). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1984) Transcript notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–69). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, L.
(2008) Body, text, and talk in Maroua Fulbe Qur’anic schooling. Text and Talk, 28(5): 643–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E.
(1979) Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pagliai, V.
(2011) Unmarked racializing discourse, facework, and identity in talk about immigrants in Italy. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21(1), E94–E112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, J. S-Y. & Bucholtz, M.
(2009) Introduction to public transcripts: Entextualization and linguistic representation in institutional contexts. Text & Talk, 29(5), 485–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrino, S.
(2020) Narrating migration: Intimacies of exclusion in northern Italy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Philips, S.
(2013) Method in anthropological discourse analysis: The comparison of units of interaction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 23(1), 82–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Preston, D. R.
(1985) The Li’l Abner syndrome: Written representations of speech. American Speech, 60(4): 328–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riley, K. C.
(2009) Who made the soup? Socializing the researcher and cooking her data. Language and Communication, 29 (3), 254–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanga, G.
(1984) Dialettologia Lombarda. Lingue e Culture Popolari. Pavia: Aurora.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B.
(1990) The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B., & Jones, G.
(2016) The ethnography of inscriptive speech. In R. Sanjek, & S. Tratner (Eds.), eFieldnotes: The makings of anthropology in the digital world (pp. 210–228). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Sobrero, A.
(Ed) (1993) Introduzione all’italiano contemporaneo. La variazione e gli usi. Bari: Edizione Laterza.Google Scholar
Spitulnik, D.
(1996) The social circulation of media discourse and the mediation of communities. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 6(2), 161–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G.
(Eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, C. B.
(2009) The making of a scription: A case study on authority and authorship. Text & Talk, 29(5):615–637. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolard, K. A.
(1999) Strategies of simultaneity and bivalency in bilingual communication. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 81, 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar