This paper investigates how communicating participants dialogically make and remake signs, and how they rely on the reflexivity of language in order to talk about linguistic experience of relevance to the communication situation they are currently involved in. It addresses the metalinguistic strategies and techniques participants employ in order to deal with linguistic indeterminacy, given that, as presumed by integrational linguistics, contextualization is individual and unique. By way of illustration a transcript of a lively discussion is provided in which the participants demonstrate some of these techniques with the result that they end up effectively contextualizing ‘together apart’.
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman and Tom Schoenemann
2009 “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning 591 (Issue Supplement s1): 1–26.
Blommaert, Jan
2005Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
Capone, Alessandro and Jacob L. Mey
(eds)2016Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer.
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2016Sproglig betydningsdannelse i teori og praksis [Linguistic meaning-creation in theory and practice], (Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Copenhagen).
Davidson, Donald
1984 “Communication and Convention.” Synthese 59(1): 3–17.
Davidson, Donald
1986 “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs.” In Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends, ed. by Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner, 157–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duncker, Dorthe
2012 “ ‘What’s it called?’ – Conventionalization, glossing practices, and linguistic (in)determinacy.” Language and Communication 32(4): 400–419.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg
1975 [2013]Truth and Method. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Grice, H. Paul
1957 “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–388.
Habermas, Jürgen
1976 “Was heißt Universalpragmatik?“ In Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie, ed. by Karl-Otto Apel, 174–272. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Harris, Roy
1981The language myth. London: Duckworth.
Harris, Roy
1993 “Integrational Linguistics.” In Actes du XVe congrès international des linguistes, ed. by André Crochetière, Jean-Claude Boulanger and Conrad Ouellon, 321–323. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Harris, Roy
1996Signs, Language and Communication. London, New York: Routledge.
Harris, Roy
1998Introduction to Integrational Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.
Harris, Roy
2009Integrationist Notes and Papers 2006–2008. Gamlingay: Bright Pen.
Harris, Roy and Christopher Hutton
2007Definition in Theory and Practice. Language, Lexicography and the Law. London, New York: Continuum.
Jones, Peter E.
2016 “ ‘Coordination’ (Herbert H. Clark), ‘integration’ (Roy Harris) and the foundations of communication theory: common ground or competing visions?” Language Sciences 531: 31–43.
1990 “The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics.” In Redefining Linguistics, ed. by Haley G. Davis and Talbot J. Taylor, 53–117. London and New York: Routledge.
Love, Nigel
1993 “Integrationalism and linguistic theory.” In Actes du XVe congrès international des linguistes, ed. by André Crochetière, Jean-Claude Boulanger and Conrad Ouellon, 330–332. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
Love, Nigel
2002 “The Language Myth and Historical Linguistics.” In The language myth in western culture, ed. by Roy Harris, 25–40. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
Martinet, André
1984 “Double Articulation as a Criterion of Linguisticity.” Language Sciences 6(1): 31–38.
Orman, Jon and Adrian Pablé
2016 “Polylanguaging, integrational linguistics and contemporary sociolinguistic theory: a commentary on Ritzau.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 19(5): 592–602.
Pablé, Adrian and Christopher Hutton
2015Signs, Meaning and Experience: Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Boston, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Inc.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53(2): 361–382.
Searle, John R.
1964 “What is a speech act?” In Philosophy in America, ed. by Max Black, 221–239. London: Allen and Unwin.
Taylor, Talbot J.
2000 “Language constructing language: the implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory.” Language Sciences 22(4): 483–499.
Toolan, Michael
2017 “Can integrational linguistics be integrated with (critical) discourse analysis?” In Critical Humanist Perspectives. The Integrational Turn in Philosophy of Language and Communication, ed. by Adrian Pablé, 79–95. London, New York: Routledge.
Weigand, Edda
2002 “The Language Myth and Linguistics Humanised.” In The language myth in western culture, ed. by Roy Harris, 55–83. Richmond, Surrey: Curzon Press.
2019. Integrating the (dialogical) sign: or who's an integrationist?. Language Sciences 75 ► pp. 72 ff.
Read, Catherine
2024. The practice of metaphor in conversation: an ecological integrational approach. Language Sciences 101 ► pp. 101588 ff.
Taylor, Talbot J. & Jasper C. van den Herik
2021. Metalinguistic exchanges in child language development. Language Sciences 88 ► pp. 101434 ff.
Weigand, Edda
2018. The theory myth. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 289 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.