Cover not available
Review article published In:
Dialogue in institutional settings
Edited by Franca Orletti and Letizia Caronia
[Language and Dialogue 9:1] 2019
► pp. 1–27
Introduction

The agency of language in institutional talk

An introduction

 | University of Bologna (Italy)
 | University of Roma 3 (Italy)
This article, introducing the Special Issue, investigates the notion of “agency of language” and its historical roots: the phenomenological emphasis on the social actors’ role in constituting their Life-World. It reconstructs the genesis – at the beginning of the 20th century – of two ideas that still nourish contemporary interactional and pragmatic views of language: language meaning relies on use, language is a tool to perform activities. Focusing on dialogue in institutional settings, it illustrates how cultures, social orders, and moral horizons are talked-into-being and shaped through the activities performed in institutional talk. It also presents the contributions in the Special Issue that address the co-constitutive relationship between language, interaction, and culture from different disciplinary perspectives as well as methodological approaches.
Keywords: agency of language, institutional talk, interactional (socio)linguistics, phenomenology, pragmatics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Building the social: The legacy of phenomenology on the study of everyday life
  • 3.The agency of language: The inner performativity of language use
  • 4.Broadening the field: From talk-in-interaction to multimodality
  • 5.Dialogue and the micro-macro link
  • 6.Talk in institutional contexts
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 5 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00029.orl
References (178)
References
Adeslwärd, Viveka, Karin Aronsson, Linda Jönsonn and Per Linell. 1987. “The Unequal distribution of interactional space: Dominance and control in courtroom Interaction”. Text 7 (4): 313–346.Google Scholar
Ahearn, Laura M. 2001. “Language and agency.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30 (1): 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1987. The Micro-Marco Link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2012. “What actions mean, to whom, and when.” Discourse Studies 14(4): 493–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage (eds.). 1984a. Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1984b. “Preference Organization.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 53–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Paul Drew. 1979. Order in Court. London: MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Later Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1979. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1996. “Sociology.” In The Social Science Encyclopedia, 2nd ed. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie A. 2011. Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 2002. Sul dialogo [On dialogue]. Milano: Guerini.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale [Problems of General Linguistics]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Berger, Paul and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire: L’économie des échanges linguistiques [The Economy of the Linguistic Exchanges]. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. “À propos de la famille comme catégorie réalisée.” [On family as realized category] Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1001: 32–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Elizabeth and John Heritage. 2006. “Taking the History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction between Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage and Douglas W. Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, Jerome S. 1986. Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1990. Acts of Meaning. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1991. “The narrative construction of reality.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Byrne, Patrick S. and Barrie E. L. Long. 1976. Doctors Talking to Patients: A Study of the Verbal Behaviour of General Practitioners Consulting in their Surgeries. London: Royal College of General Practitioners Publications.Google Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and François Cooren. 2014. “Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things.” Discourse and Communication 81: 41–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia. 2015. “Totem and taboo: The embarrassing epistemic work of things in the research setting.” Qualitative Research 15(2): 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “How at home is an ethnographer “at-home”? Territories of knowledge and the making of ethnographic understanding.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 71: 114–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. “Following and Analyzing an Artifact: Culture-through-things.” In Methodological and Ontological Principles of Observation and Analysis, ed. by François Cooren and Fabienne Malbois, 112–138. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cefaï, Daniel. 1998. Phénoménologie et sciences sociales. Alfred Schutz: Naissance d’une anthropologie philosophique. Paris et Genève: Librairie Droz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1981. “Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis.” In Analysis in social theory and methodology: Toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies, ed. by Karin Knorr-Cetina and Aaron V. Cicourel, 51–80. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
1980. “Three models of discourse analysis: The role of social structure.” Discourse processes 3 (2): 101–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “The Interpenetration of Communicative Contexts: Examples from Medical Encounters.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 291–310. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François. 2004. “Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings.” Organization 11(3): 373–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2017. Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage. 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul. 2006. “When documents speak: Documents, language and interaction.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond and Darin Weinberg, 63–80. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Charles Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro and Donald Brenneis. 1986. “The Audience as Co-author: An Introduction”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 6(3): 239–248.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Relativity”. In Key Terms in Language and Culture, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 129–131. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Il parlare come pratica sociale [“I’m by myself”].” In Manuale di psicologia sociale, ed. by Giuseppe Mantovani. Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Agency in Language.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 451–473. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Linguistic Anthropology: Language as a Non-Neutral Medium.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Rajend Mesthrie. 28–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Derek and Jonathan Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Discursive psychology.” In How to Analyze Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods, ed. by Alec McHoul and Mark Rapley. 12–24. London and New York: Continuum International.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2005. “Discursive psychology.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 257–273. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Discourse and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra and Cristina Zucchermaglio. 2008. “Narratives in the workplace: Facts, fiction and canonicity.” Text and Talk 28(3): 351–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galatolo, Renata, Erika Vassallo and Letizia Caronia. 2015. ““Je m’en mets toute seule”: Séquences d’étayage dans les repas de famille [“I’ll do it by myself”. Sequences of scaffolding during family dinnertimes]”. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée 1011: 117–135.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold and Kenneth Liberman. 2007. “Introduction: The Lebenswelt origins of the sciences.” Human Studies 30(1): 3–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth J. 1985. “The Social Constructionist Movement in Modern Psychology.” American Psychologist 40(3): 266–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergen, Mary M. and Kenneth J. Gergen. 2003. Social Construction: A Reader. London, Sage.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, Virginia T. and Douglas, W. Maynard. 2006. “Explaining Illness: Patients’ Proposals and Physicians’ Responses”. In Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. ed. by John Heritage and Douglas, W. Maynard, 115–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.” Psychiatry 18 (3): 213–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
. 1971. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. “The interaction order.” American Sociological Review 481: 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Alessandro Duranti. 1992. “Rethinking Context: An Introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. “Professional vision”. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Contextures of Action.” In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jurgen Streek, Charles Goodwin and Curt LeBaron, 182–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David L. 1988. “A Turn Taking system for british news interviews.” Language in Society 171: 401–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Prescriptions and Prescribing: Coordinating Talk- and Text-based Activities.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 313–339. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1978. “Further Notes on Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 113–127. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1964. “Linguistic and Social Interaction in Two Communities.” In The Ethnography of Communication, ed. by J. J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, American Anthropologist 66 (6), II1 [Special Issue]: 137–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1982. Language and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen Levinson. 1996. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotics. The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
ten Have, Paul. 1989. “The Consultation as a Genre.” In Text and Talk as Social Practice, ed. by B. I. Torode, 115–135. Dordrecht-Providence: R.I. Foris.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian and Paul Luff. 2012. “Embodied Action and Organizational Activity.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 283–330. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian. 1984. “Participation in the medical consultation: The co-ordination of erbal and non-verbal behaviour between the doctor and the patient.” Sociology of Health and Illness 6(3): 311–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1986. Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Diagnosis and Assessment in the Medical Consultation.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 235–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Body Work: The Collaborative Production of the Clinical Object.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 185–213. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Douglas W. Maynard. 2006. Communication in Medical Care. Interaction between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 2006. “Accounting for the visit: giving reasons for seeking medical care.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients ed. by John Heritage and Douglas Maynard, 48–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Stephen Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, Jeffrey Robinson, Marc Elliott, Marion Beckett and Michael Wilkes. 2007. “Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(10): 1429–1433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, ed. by David Silverman, 222–245. London: Sage.Google Scholar
. 2011. “A Galilean moment in social theory? Language, culture and their emergent properties.” Qualitative Sociology 341: 263–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970 [1936]. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Translated and edited by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1962. “The ethnography of speaking.” Anthropology and Human Behavior 13 (53): 11–74.Google Scholar
. 1964. Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1974. “Ways of Speaking.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. by Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer, 433–452. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco. 1996. Credibility in Court. Communicative Practices in the Camorra Trials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1973. “A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: Overlapped tag-positioned address terms in closing sequences.” Semiotica 9(1): 47–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1990. Conducting Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2010. “The Case for an Eclectic Approach to Discourse-in-Interaction.” In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, 71–98. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1997. “Linguistic relativity.” Annual Review of Anthropology 261: 291–312. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages”. In The Meaning of Meaning, ed. by Charles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
. 1935. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 2013. “Storytelling in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 492–507. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
McHoul, Alexander. 1978. “The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom.” Language in Society 7(1): 183–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, Jitendra Nath (ed.). 1985. Phenomenology and the Human Sciences. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijoff /Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2011. “The Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action in Surgical Demonstration.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Videorecording practices and the reflexive constitution of the interaction.” Human Studies 321: 67–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Natanson, Maurice. 1973. Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca. 1981. “Classroom Verbal Interaction: A Conversational Analysis.” In Possibilities and Limitations of Pragmatics, ed. by Herman Parret, Marina Sbisà and Jef Verschueren, 531–550. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Fra conversazione e discorso: l’analisi dell’interazione verbale [Between conversation and discourse: the analisys of verbal interaction]. Firenze: NIS.Google Scholar
. 2000. La conversazione diseguale. Potere e interazione [Unequal conversations. Power and interaction]. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
. 2013. “L’emergere e la costruzione delle identità nell’interazione medico-paziente in contesti multiculturali.” [Identity emergence and construction in doctor-patient interaction in multicultural encounters] In La sfida della multiculturalità nell’interazione medico-paziente, ed. by Franca Orletti and Marilena Fatigante, Salute e società [Special issue], 12(1):61–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Le forme dell’autodiagnosi: negoziazioni dell’asimmetria di conoscenze fra medico e paziente [The shapes of auto-diagnoses: doctor-patient knowledge-asymmetry negotiations].” In Tra linguistica medica e linguistica clinica. Il ruolo del linguista, ed. by Franca Orletti, Anna Cardinaletti and Francesca Dovetto, Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata [Special Issue] 44(3): 546–560.Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca and Marilena Fatigante. 2013. La sfida della multiculturalità nell’interazione medico-paziente [The doctor-patient challenge of multiculturalism]. Salute e società [Special Issue] 12(1).Google Scholar
Orletti, Franca and Rossella Iovino. 2016. “Latin as a Tool for Social Differentiation. A Study of the Italian Juridical and Medical Language”. 3rd ISA Forum of Sociology, Vienna, 10–14 July.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan. 2004. “Language and Social Inequality”. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 474–495. Oxford: Backwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita and John Heritage. 2013. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 229–256. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Anna M. Ajello and Cristina Zucchermaglio. 1992. Discutendo si impara [Learning by talking together]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.Google Scholar
Pontecorvo, Clotilde. 1993a. “Social Interaction in the Acquisition of Knowledge.” Educational Psychology Review 5(3): 293–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1993b. “Introduction: Forms of Discourse and Shared Thinking.” Cognition and Instruction 11(3/4): 189–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan and Hedwig te Molder. 2005. Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Psathas, George. 2004. “Alfred Schutz’s influence on American sociologists and sociology.” Human Studies 27(1): 1–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Linda L. and Anne M. Nicotera. 2009. Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabinow, Paul and William M. Sullivan. 1987. Interpretive Social Science: A Second Look. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ritzer, George and Jeffrey Stepnisky. 2018. Classical Sociological Theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. 2003. “An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation.” Health Communication 151: 27–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1967. The Linguistic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation.” Language 501: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1963. “Sociological description.” Berkeley Journal of Sociology 81: 1–16.Google Scholar
. 1972. “On the Analyzability of Stories by Children.” In Directions in Sociolinguistics, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 329–345. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
. 1984. “Notes on Methodology.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1972. “Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David N. Sudnow. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1987. “Between Micro and Macro: Context and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey Alexander. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1992. “In Another Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 193–227. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997. “Whose text? Whose context?” Discourse & Society 8(2): 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted.” In The Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by Nicholas J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The Structures of the Life-World. Evanston, IL: Nothwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers, Vol. I. The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
. 1964. Collected papers, Vol. II. Studies in Social Theory. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
. 1967 [1932]. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverman, David. 1987. Communication and Medical Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stati, Sorin. 1982. II dialogo. Considerazioni di linguistica pragmatica. Napoli: Liguori.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2006. “Treatment Decisions: Negotiations between Doctors and Patients in Acute Care Encounters”. In Communication in Medical Care, ed. by John Heritage and Douglas J. Maynard, 279–321. Cambridge: Cambrigde University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron. 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jurgen. 2010. “New Adventures in Language and Social Interaction”. In New Adventures in Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Jurgen Streeck, 1–8. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “The Changing Meanings of Things: Found Objects and Inscriptions in Social Interaction.” In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, edited by Jurgen Streeck, Charles Goodwin and Curtis LeBaron, 67–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Throop, Jason C. 2018. “Being Open to the World.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8(1/2): 197–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen. 2002. Everyday Talk. Building and Reflecting Identities. NewYork/London: Guilford.Google Scholar
. 2009. “How questioning construct judge identities: Oral argument about same-sex marriage.” Discourse Studies 11(2): 199–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyryakian, Edward A. 1973. “Sociology and Existential Phenomenology.” In Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, ed. by Maurice Natanson, 187–222. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A. 2006. “Discourse, context and cognition.” Discourse Studies 8(1): 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena L. 2017. “Strategic maneuvering in dispute mediation.” Argumentation and Advocacy 53(3): 234–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena. 2012. “Argumentation in the context of mediation activity.” Journal of Argumentation in context. 1(2): 209–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962 [1934]. Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. “Interaction between Learning and Development.” In Mind in Society, ed. by Michael Cole, Vera John-Steiner, Sylvia Scribner and Ellen Souberman, 79–91. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009. Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wertsch, James V. 1985. Culture, Communication and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1991. Voices of the Mind. Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Philosophical Investigati2ons, ed. by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe and Rush Rhees; translated by Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth (ed.). 1989. Language, Power and Ideology: Studies in Political Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright Mills, Charles. 1940. “Situated action and vocabularies of motive.” American Sociological Review 51: 904–913. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

De Vecchis, Kevin
2024. Osservazioni sulle strategie linguistiche di inclusione in testi informativi d’ambito medico e sull’accettabilità di alcuni nomi femminili delle professioni sanitarie . In Lingua inclusiva: forme, funzioni, atteggiamenti e percezioni , DOI logo
Caronia, Letizia & Vittoria Colla
2023. Beyond school-related learning: Parent-child homework talk as a morality building activity. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 43 ► pp. 100778 ff. DOI logo
Caronia, Letizia, Vittoria Colla & Federica Ranzani
2022. Practices of Inclusion in Primary Care Visits of Unaccompanied Foreign Minors: Allocating Agency as an Interprofessionally Distributed Intercultural Competence. In Interculturality in Institutions [Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action, ], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Caronia, Letizia, Federica Ranzani & Vittoria Colla
2022. Shifting addressivity. Language and Dialogue 12:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Perez, James
2022. I’m not going to have a conversation with you: Linguistic refusals of 1stAmendment YouTube auditors during police interactions. Communication and Democracy 56:2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.