Article published In:
Dialogue in institutional settings
Edited by Franca Orletti and Letizia Caronia
[Language and Dialogue 9:1] 2019
► pp. 4264


Bull, Peter, Judy Elliot, Derrol Palmer and Libby Walker
1996 “Why Politicians Are Three-Faced: The Face Model of Political Interviews”. British Journal of Social Psychology 351: 267–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2013Analysing Political Speeches. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul Anthony
2004Analysing Political Discourse. Theory and Practics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 “The Stance Triangle”. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. [URL]. DOI logo
Dynel, Marta
2011 “Revisiting Goffman’s Postulates on Participant Statuses in Verbal Interaction: Goffman on Participants in Verbal Interaction.” Language and Linguistics Compass 5(7): 454–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2006 “Minister, We Will See How the Public Judges You.’” Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie-Harness
1990He-Said-She-Said. Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
1990 “Ein Gespenst geht um in Osterreich”. Textlinguistische Untersuchungen zum Populistischen Diskurs J. Haiders. In Sprache in der Politik – Politik in der Sprache. Analysen zum Öffentlichen Sprachgebrauch, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Florian Menz, 191–208. Klagenfurt: Drava.Google Scholar
1993 “Political Language and Textual Vagueness”. Pragmatics 3(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Streitgespräche: Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 “Disagreeing: Sequential Placement and Internal Structure of Disagreements in Conflict Episodes”. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 18 (4): 467–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Genres in Political Discourse: The Case of the “Inaugural Speech” of Austrian Chancellors”. In Analyzing Genre in Political Communication: Theory and Practice, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urszula Okulska, 29–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015a “Establishing Intertextual References in Austrian Parliamentary Debates. A Pilot Study”. In Follow-Ups in Political Discourse. Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains, ed. by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer, 15–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b “Policy-Oriented Argumentation or Ironic Evaluation: A Study of Verbal Quoting and Positioning in Austrian Politicians’ Parliamentary Debate Contributions”. Discourse Studies 17 (6): 682–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Sandra
2001 “Being Politically Impolite: Extending Politeness Theory to Adversarial Political Discourse”. Discourse and Society 12 (4): 451–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hess-Lüttich, Ernest W. B.
2007 “(Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV-Debates”. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (8): 1360–1370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kadar, Daniel Z. and Michael Haugh
2013Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 “Disagreement and Concession in Disputes: On the Context Sensitivity of Preference Structures”. Language in Society 22 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey Neil and Mick Short
2007Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.
1985 “How Children Start Arguments”. Language in Society 14 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter and William Turnbull
1998 “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing”. Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 225–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stopfner, Maria
2013Streitkultur Im Parlament. Linguistische Analyse Der Zwischenruf im Österreichischen Nationalrat. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1988International News Reporting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
2009The Discourse of Politics in Action. Politics as Usual. Houndsmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2017 “The “Establishment”, the “Élites”, and the “People”: Who’s Who?”. Journal of Language and Politics 16 (4): 551–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zima, Elisabeth, Geert Brone and Kurt Feyaerts
2010 “Patterns of Interaction in Austrian Parliamentary Debates”. In European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse Strategies and Interaction Practices, ed. by Cornelia Ilie, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gruber, Helmut
2022. When invoked voices blame real politicians. Pragmatics and Society 13:5  pp. 793 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.