Cover not available
Article published In:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 9:2 (2019) ► pp.236–263

Oral discourse competence-in-performance

Analysing learner dialogues

| Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (Spain)
| Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona (Spain)
Mastering a language implies being able to deploy a wide variety of speech genres (Bakhtin 1952–1953). However, the features which define these genres are often obscure to students or ‘occluded’ in the sense used by Swales (1996). In this paper, nine dialogues between B1-level French learners in the context of an oral exam are analysed in order to describe the degree of dialogic competence-in-performance (Weigand 2017) achieved. Because these dialogues were of two types, an exchange of opinions and a guided interview, our analysis reveals hybrid results. This hybridity affects the opening and closing sequences of the dialogue, floor-taking in the central part and the linguistic resources used by the students to give their opinions. These findings identify formative needs as well as the indicators of achievement that are required to assess students’ oral competence-in-performance.
Keywords: dialogue, assessment, oral communication, speech genres, French as a Foreign Language, exam
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework: Discourse competence-in-performance and oral communication
    • 2.1Oral communication: Dimensions and units of analysis
      • 2.1.1The sociocultural dimension
      • 2.1.2Pragmatic dimension
      • 2.1.3Textual dimension
    • 2.2Spoken discourse genres in the CEFR (2018): Assessment criteria
    • 2.3Description of speech genres
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Analysis and discussion
    • 4.1Conversational sequences: Framing and topic sequences
    • 4.2Turn-taking in S-S (échange)
    • 4.3Turn-taking in S-S-T (guided interview)
    • 4.4Backchannels
    • 4.5Linguistic resources
  • 5.Conclusions and pedagogical implications
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00040.can
References (38)
References
Acosta, Laura (in press). La gestión de turnos en la interacción entre estudiantes en el aula de ELE. Doctoral thesis. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Adam, Jean-Michel. 1992. Les textes: types et prototypes [Texts: Types and Prototypes]. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1952–1953 [1986]. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, 60–102. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
. 1978. Esthétique et théorie du roman [Aesthetic and Theory of the Novel]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Béacco, Jean Claude, Béatrice Blin, Emmanuelle Houles, Sylvie Lepage, and Patrick Riba. 2011. Niveau B1 pour le français. Un référentiel [Level B1 for French. A Reference]. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique. 1982. Introducción a la lingüística del texto [Introduction to Text Linguistics]. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Black, Paul and Dylan Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21(5): 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borreguero, Margarita and Britta Thörle. 2016. “Discourse Markers in Second Language Acquisition.” Language, Interaction and Acquisition 7(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briz, Antonio. 2000. “Las unidades de la conversación [Conversation Units].” RILCE 16(2): 225–246.Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales [Corpus of Colloquial Conversations]. Madrid: Arco Libros (Annex to the Oralia journal).Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule. 1983. Teaching Spoken Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Canale, Michael. 1983. “From Communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy.” In Language and Communication, ed. by Jack C. Richards and Richard W. Schmidt, 2–27. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ciapuscio, Guiomar Elena. 2007. “Genres et familles de genres: apports pour l’acquisition de la compétence générique dans le domaine académique [Genres and Genre Families: Contributions for the Acquisition of General Competence in the Academic Context].” ELA 1481: 405–416.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, Marianne. 2007. “Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching.” In Intercultural Language Use and Language Learning, ed. by Eva Alcón Soler and Maria Pilar Safont Jordà, 41–57. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cestero, Ana María. 2000. El intercambio de turnos de habla en la conversación [Turn Exchange in Conversation]. Alcalá de Henares: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
. 2005. Conversación y enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras [Conversation and Foreign Language Teaching]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
. 2007. “La conversación en los programas de enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras [Conversation in Foreign Language Teaching Programmes].” Frecuencia L 331: 3–8.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Marco común europeo de referencia para las lenguas: aprendizaje, enseñanza, evaluación [Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment]. Madrid: MECD-Subdirección General de Información y Publicaciones / Grupo ANAYA.Google Scholar
. 2018. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Companion Volume with New Descriptors. Strasbourg: Cedex. Available at [URL]
Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fernández, María José and Marta Albelda. 2008. La enseñanza de la conversación coloquial en la clase de E/LE [Teaching colloquial conversation in the SFL classroom]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1971. “Sociolinguistics and the Ethnography of Speaking.” In Social Anthropology and Language, ed. by Edwin Ardener, 47–93. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco. 2002. Producción, expresión e interacción oral [Oral Production, Expression and Interaction]. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 1995. “ Hunh-tags and Evidentiality in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 23(6): 687–692. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oreström, Bengt. 1983. Turn-taking in English Conversation. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Poyatos, Fernando. 1994. La comunicación no verbal [Non Verbal Communication]. Madrid: Itsmo.Google Scholar
Robles Garrote, Pilar. 2017. “La interacción en el aula de español como lengua extranjera: estrategias didácticas y destrezas docentes [The Interaction in Classrooms of Spanish as a Foreign Language: Didactic Strategies and Teaching Skills].” In Necesidades y tendencias en la formación del profesorado de español como lengua extranjera, ed. by Dimitrinka G. Nikeleva, 231–255. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty and Lenore Monk. 2008. “The Statement of Purpose in Graduate Program Applications: Genre Structure and Disciplinary Variation.” English for Specific Purposes 271, 193–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John. 1996. “Occluded Genres in the Academy: The Case of the Submission Letter.” In Academia Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues, ed. by Eija Ventola, and Anna Mauranen, 45–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun. 1978. La ciencia del texto [Text Science]. Barcelona: Paidós.Google Scholar
Van Ek, Jan Ate. 1986. Objectives for Foreign Language Learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Van Lier, Leo. 1989. “Reeling, Writhing, Drawling, Stretching, and Fainting in Coils: Oral Proficiency Interviews as Conversation.” TESOL Quarterly 231: 489–508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, Graciela. 2000. La destreza oral. Conversar, exponer, argumentar [Oral Skills: Talking, Presenting, Arguing]. Madrid: Edelsa.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009 (ed.). Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. “IADA History. The Unity of Dialogue and its Multiple Faces.” Language and Dialogue 7(1): 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Jacques (ed.). 1991. L’évaluation: Problème de communication [Assessment: A Communication Problem]. Coussest: DelVal.Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor. 1970. “On Getting a Word in Edgewise.” In Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–557. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar