Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes
This study focuses on parent-child argumentation to identify the argumentative strategies most frequently used by
parents to resolve in their favor the process of negotiation occurring during argumentative dialogues with their children at
mealtime. Findings of the analysis of 132 argumentative dialogues indicate that parents mostly use arguments based on the notions
of quality and quantity in food-related discussions. The parents use other types of arguments such as the appeal to consistency,
the arguments from authority, and the arguments from analogy, in discussions related to the teaching of correct behaviors in
social situations within and outside the family context. The results of this study show how parents and children contribute to
co-constructing the dialogic process of negotiating their divergent opinions.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Studies on argumentation in the family context
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Data corpus
- 3.2Transcription procedures
- 3.3Definition of argumentative situation and selection of the arguments
- 4.Results
- 4.1Quality and quantity
- 4.2Appeal to consistency
- 4.3Authority
- 4.4Analogy
- 5.Discussion and conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References
Arcidiacono, Francesco and Antonio Bova
2015 “
Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes: Differences and similarities in children of 3–5 and 6–9 years old.”
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 61: 40–55.


Arcidiacono, Francesco and Antonio Bova
2017 Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts. New York: Springer.


Arcidiacono, Francesco and Clotilde Pontecorvo
2009 “
Verbal conflict as a cultural practice in Italian family interactions between parents and preadolescents.”
European Journal of Psychology of Education 24(1): 97–117.


Aukrust, Vibeke
2002 “
‘What did you do in school today?’ Speech genres and tellability in multiparty family mealtime conversations in two cultures.” In
Talking to Adults, ed. by
Shoshana Blum-Kulka and
Catherine E. Snow, 55–84. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1997 Dinner Talk: Cultural Patterns of Sociability and Socialization in Family Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Bova, Antonio
2015c “
Children’s responses in argumentative discussions relating to parental rules and prescriptions.”
Ampersand 21: 109–121.


Bova, Antonio
2019 The Functions of Parent-Child Argumentation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.


Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
2013a “
Invoking the authority of feelings as a strategic maneuver in family mealtime conversations.”
Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 23(3): 206–224.


Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
2013b “
Investigating children’s Why-questions. A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function.”
Discourse Studies 15(6): 713–734.


Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
2014 “
You must eat the salad because it is nutritious.” Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes.”
Appetite 731: 81–94.


Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
2017 “
Interpersonal dynamics within argumentative interactions: An introduction.” In
Interpersonal Argumentation in Educational and Professional Contexts, ed. by
Francesco Arcidiacono and
Antonio Bova. New York: Springer.


Bova, Antonio and Francesco Arcidiacono
2018 “
Interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children’s reactions, and topics of disagreement during mealtime conversations.”
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 191: 124–133.


Bova, Antonio, Francesco Arcidiacono, and Fabrice Clément
Brumark, Å.
2008 “
‘Eat your hamburger!’ – ‘No, I don’t want to!’ Argumentation and argumentative development in the context of dinner conversation in twenty Swedish families.”
Argumentation 22(2): 251–271.


Caffi, Claudia
1999 “
On mitigation.”
Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 881–909.


Dunn, Judy and Penny Munn
1987 “
Developmental of justification in disputes with mother and sibling.”
Developmental Psychology 23(6): 791–798.


van Eemeren, Frans H. and Rob Grootendorst
2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goodwin Harness, Marjorie
2007 “
Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction.”
Discourse and Society 18(1): 93–110.


Heritage, John and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “
The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences.”
Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.


Hester, Sally and Stephen Hester
2010 “
Conversational actions and category relations: An analysis of a children’s argument.”
Discourse Studies 12(1): 33–48.


Kuhn, Deanna
1991 The Skills of Argument. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.


Laforest, Marty
2002 “
Scenes of family life: complaining in everyday conversation.”
Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11): 1595–1620.


MacWhinney, Brian
2000 The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. 3rd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mead, Margaret
1959 Four Families. Ottawa: National Film Board of Canada.

Mercier, Hugo
2011 “
Reasoning serves argumentation in children.”
Cognitive Development 26(3): 177–191.


Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “
The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations.”
Food Quality and Preference 20(8): 558–571.


Ochs, Elinor
2006 “
The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.”
New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 1111: 35–49.


Ochs, Elinor and Merav Shohet
2006 “
The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization.” In
Family Mealtime as a Context of Development and Socialization. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development Series. Vol. 111, ed. by
Reed W. Larson,
Kathryn R. Branscomb and
Anglea R. Wiley, 35–50. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Ochs, Elinor and Carolyn Taylor
1992 “
Family narrative as political activity.”
Discourse and Society 3(3): 301–340.


Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Francesco Arcidiacono
Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Alessandra Fasulo
1997 “
Learning to argue in family shared discourse: The reconstruction of past events.” In
Discourse, Tools and Reasoning: Essays on Situated Cognition, ed. by
Lauren Resnick,
Roger Säljö,
Clotilde Pontecorvo, and
Barbara Burge, 406–442. New York, NY: Springer.


Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Alessandra Fasulo
1999 “
Planning a typical Italian meal: A family reflection on culture.”
Culture Psychology 5(3): 313–335.


Pontecorvo, Clotilde, Alessandra Fasulo, and Laura Sterponi
2001 “
Mutual apprentices: Making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations.”
Human Development 44(6): 340–361.


Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Sabine Pirchio
2000 “
A developmental view on children’s arguing: The need of the other.”
Human Development 43(6): 361–363.


Pontecorvo, Clotilde and Laura Sterponi
2002 “
Learning to argue and reason through discourse in educational settings.” In
Learning for Life in the 21st Century: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education, ed. by
Gordon Wells and
Guy Claxton, 127–140. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.


Raymond, Geoffrey and John Heritage
2006 “
The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren.”
Language in Society 35(5): 677–705.


Rigotti, Eddo and Greco S. Morasso
2009 “
Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource.” In
Argumentation and Education, ed. by
Nathalie Muller-Mirza and
Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont, 1–61. New York, NY: Springer.


Sarangapani, Padma M.
2003 Constructing School Knowledge. An Ethnography of Learning in an Indian Village. New Delhi: Sage.

Slomkowski, Cheryl L. and Judy Dunn
1992 “
Arguments and relationships within the family: Differences in young children’s disputes with mother and sibling.”
Developmental Psychology 28(5): 919–924.


Tulviste, Tiia, Luule Mizera, Boer De Geer, and Marja-terttu Tryggvason
2002 “
Regulatory comments as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian, Swedish and Finnish mealtime interaction.”
Language in Society 31(5): 655–678.


Voss, James F. and Julie A. van Dyke
2001 “
Argumentation in psychology: Background comments.”
Discourse Processes 32(2–3): 89–111.


Vuchinich, Samuel
1990 “
The sequential organization of closing in verbal family conflict.” In
Conflict Talk, ed. by
Allen Day Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Walton, D. N.
1997 Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Walton, Douglas N., Chris Reed, and Fabrizio Macagno
2008 Argumentation Schemes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.


Weigand, Edda
1999 “
Rhetoric and argumentation in a dialogic perspective.” In
Rhetoric and Argumentation, ed. by
Eddo Rigotti and
Sara Cigada, 53–69. Tubingen: Niemeyer.

Weigand, Edda
2001 “
Games of power.” In
Negotiation and Power in Dialogic Interaction, ed. by
Edda Weigand and
Marcelo Dascal, 63–76. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.


Weigand, Edda
2006 “
Argumentation: The Mixed Game.”
Argumentation 20(1): 59–87.


Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Bova, Antonio
2021.
Co-construction of argumentative discussions between parents and children during mealtime conversations. A pragma-dialectical analysis.
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 29
► pp. 100519 ff.

Mustajoki, Arto & Alla Bajkulova
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.