Cover not available
Article published In:
Dialogue and Ways of Relating
Edited by Huey-Rong Chen
[Language and Dialogue 10:1] 2020
► pp. 9–28

Reconciling dialogue and propagation

A ventriloquial inquiry

| Université de Montréal (Canada)

Dialoguing is about co-orienting to various elements of a situation, that propagate themselves in what people say and do. In other words, each time people talk about an element of a situation, whether it is the weather, the economy, or the declaration of a presidential candidate, it is, by definition, a way for it to transport itself through time and space, which is the essence of propagation. Language must therefore be rethought as something that not only allows us, but also other things to do things with words. More generally, communication, whether verbal or non-verbal, must be understood as a process by which everything or everyone can always become a medium, sign or intermediary through which other elements propagate, diffuse or disseminate themselves.

Keywords: dialogue, propagation, ventriloquism, agency
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Downstream ventriloquism
  • 3.Upstream ventriloquism
  • 4.Dialogue and propagation: A ventriloquial analysis
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
References
Adams, Jennifer L.
2017 “Self-interest and social concerns.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 294–306. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allwood, Jens
2017 “Pragmatics: From language as a system of signs to language use.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 9–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristotle
2004 Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Bakthin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen
2003 “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–830. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena
2014 “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language Under Discussion, 2(1), Retrieved from [URL]
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Oren Livio, and Frédérik Matte
2020 “The authority of the “broader context”: What’s not in the interaction?” In Bencherki, N., Matte, F., and Cooren, F. (Eds). Authority and Power in Social Interaction: Methods and Analysis, 18–36. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1990 The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control, Vol. VI1. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carey, James W.
2008 Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New york: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castor, Theresa
2016 “The materiality of discourse: Relational positioning in a fresh water controversy.” Communication Research and Practice 2(3): 334–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cole, Samantha
2017 “AI-assisted fake porn is here and we’re all fucked.” Motherboard. Retrieved from [URL]
Connor, Steven
2000 Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François and Sergey Sandler
2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory, 241, 225-244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication 621: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication.” Language Under Discussion 2(1). Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
2016 “Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24(1): 17–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Day, Amber
2018 “Throwing our voices: Ventriloquism as new media activism”. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 617-628. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1967/1978 Writing and Difference. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1988 Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, David
2006 Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Grein, Marion
2017 “Emotion, reason and the human brain.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 277–293. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mark B. N.
2006 “Media theory.” Theory, Culture & Society 231: 297–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
2016 Ponderings II-VI: Black notebooks 1931–1938. New Haven, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick
2003 “Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2005 “Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2017 “From pragmatics to dialogue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sarah
2016 “Puppet love: Documenting ventriloquism in Nina Conti’s Her Master’s Voice.” Camera Obscura, 92(31), 60-91.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A.
1986/1999 Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford California Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille
2015 Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1986 “Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together.” In Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, ed. by Elizabeth Long and Henrika Kuklick, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3(4): 228–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall
1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1868 “Some consequences of four incapacities.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2(3): 140–157.Google Scholar
Peters, John D.
1999 Speaking into the Air: A history of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Beth Lewis
2009 “Ventriloquation in discussion of student writing: Examples from a high school english class.” Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 52-88.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1959 Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye ed.). New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron
1997 “Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(1): 39–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 “The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: work, the body and the earth.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 20–31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shotter, John
1993 Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
2014 “Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns.” Theory and Psychology 24(3): 305–325. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James R. and Elizabeth J. Van Every
2011 The Situated Organization: Case Studies In the Pragmatics of Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Drenten, Jenna & Evie Psarras
2021. Digital ventriloquism and celebrity access: Cameo and the emergence of paid puppeteering on digital platforms. New Media & Society ► pp. 146144482110411 ff. DOI logo
Weigand, Edda
2021. Language and dialogue in philosophy and science. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 533 ff. DOI logo
2021. Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo
Whitfield, Agnes
2022. Unspoken assumptions, deep holes and boundless expectations. Language and Dialogue 12:1 ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.