Article published in:
Dialogue and Ways of Relating
Edited by Huey-Rong Chen
[Language and Dialogue 10:1] 2020
► pp. 9–28

Reconciling dialogue and propagation

A ventriloquial inquiry

| Université de Montréal (Canada)
Dialoguing is about co-orienting to various elements of a situation, that propagate themselves in what people say and do. In other words, each time people talk about an element of a situation, whether it is the weather, the economy, or the declaration of a presidential candidate, it is, by definition, a way for it to transport itself through time and space, which is the essence of propagation. Language must therefore be rethought as something that not only allows us, but also other things to do things with words. More generally, communication, whether verbal or non-verbal, must be understood as a process by which everything or everyone can always become a medium, sign or intermediary through which other elements propagate, diffuse or disseminate themselves.
Keywords: dialogue, propagation, ventriloquism, agency
Published online: 19 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00057.coo
References

References

Adams, Jennifer L.
2017 “Self-interest and social concerns.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 294–306. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allwood, Jens
2017 “Pragmatics: From language as a system of signs to language use.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 9–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristotle
2004 Rhetoric (W. R. Roberts, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Bakthin, Mikhail M.
1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1984 Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Karen
2003 “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–830. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 26 ]
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena
2014 “Ventriloquism as a matter for discourse analysis.” Language Under Discussion, 2(1), Retrieved from www​.ludjournal​.org​/index​.php​?journal​=LUD​&page​=article​&op​=view​&path%5B%5D​=35​&path%5B%5D​=17
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena, Oren Livio, and Frédérik Matte
2020 “The authority of the “broader context”: What’s not in the interaction?” In Bencherki, N., Matte, F., and Cooren, F. (Eds). Authority and Power in Social Interaction: Methods and Analysis, 18–36. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
1990 The Structure of Pedagogic Discourse: Class, Codes and Control, Vol. VI. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carey, James W.
2008 Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. New york: Routledge.Google Scholar
Castor, Theresa
2016 “The materiality of discourse: Relational positioning in a fresh water controversy.” Communication Research and Practice 2(3): 334–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cole, Samantha
2017 “AI-assisted fake porn is here and we’re all fucked.” Motherboard. Retrieved from www​.vice​.com​/en​_us​/article​/gydydm​/gal​-gadot​-fake​-ai​-porn
Connor, Steven
2000 Dumbstruck: A Cultural History of Ventriloquism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François and Sergey Sandler
2014 “Polyphony, ventriloquism, and constitution: In dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory, 24, 225-244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “Communication theory at the center: Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality.” Journal of Communication 62: 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Pragmatism as ventriloquism: Creating a dialogue among seven traditions in the study of communication.” Language Under Discussion 2(1). Retrieved from www​.ludjournal​.org​/index​.php​?journal​=LUD​&page​=article​&op​=view​&path%5B%5D​=16​&path%5B%5D​=5. Crossref
2016 “Ethics for dummies: Ventriloquism and responsibility.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 24(1): 17–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Day, Amber
2018 “Throwing our voices: Ventriloquism as new media activism”. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 617-628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1967/1978 Writing and Difference. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1988 Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Goldblatt, David
2006 Art and Ventriloquism: Critical Voices in Art, Theory and Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959 The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Grein, Marion
2017 “Emotion, reason and the human brain.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 277–293. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mark B. N.
2006 “Media theory.” Theory, Culture & Society 23: 297–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
2016 Ponderings II-VI: Black notebooks 1931–1938. New Haven, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 27 ]
Iedema, Rick
2003 “Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual Communication 2(1): 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2005 “Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 141–154. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2017 “From pragmatics to dialogue.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 78–92. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kessler, Sarah
2016 “Puppet love: Documenting ventriloquism in Nina Conti’s Her Master’s Voice.” Camera Obscura, 92(31), 60-91.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A.
1986/1999 Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford California Press.Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille
2015 Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1986 “Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together.” In Knowledge and Society Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present, ed. by Elizabeth Long and Henrika Kuklick, 1–40. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
1987 Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “On Interobjectivity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3(4): 228–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
2009 Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall
1964 Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1868 “Some consequences of four incapacities.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 2(3): 140–157.Google Scholar
Peters, John D.
1999 Speaking into the Air: A history of the Idea of Communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Beth Lewis
2009 “Ventriloquation in discussion of student writing: Examples from a high school english class.” Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 52-88.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1959 Course in General Linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye ed.). New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron
1997 “Handbills, tissues, and condoms: A site of engagement for the construction of identity in public discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(1): 39–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2005 “The rhythmic integration of action and discourse: work, the body and the earth.” In Discourse in Action: Introducing Mediated Discourse Analysis, ed. by Sigrid Norris and Rodney H. Jones, 20–31. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shotter, John
1993 Conversational Realities: Constructing Life through Language. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
[ p. 28 ]
2014 “Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns.” Theory and Psychology 24(3): 305–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, James R. and Elizabeth J. Van Every
2011 The Situated Organization: Case Studies In the Pragmatics of Communication. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2010 Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2017 The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar