Article published in:
Dialogue and Ways of Relating
Edited by Huey-Rong Chen
[Language and Dialogue 10:1] 2020
► pp. 2948
References

References

Barad, Karen
2007Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich
1992Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas and François Cooren
2011 “Having To Be: The Possessive Constitution of Organization.” Human Relations 64: 1579–1607. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bencherki, Nicolas, Frederic Matte, and François Cooren
(eds) 2019Authority and Power in Social Interaction Methods and Analysis. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benoit-Barné, Chantal and François Cooren
2009 “The Accomplishment of Authority Through Presentification How Authority Is Distributed Among and Negotiated by Organizational Members.” Management Communication Quarterly 23 (1): 5–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carbaugh, Donal
1989 “Fifty terms for talk: A cross-cultural study.” International and intercultural communication annual 13 (93): 120.Google Scholar
Caronia, Letizia and François Cooren
2014 “Decentering Our Analytical Position: The Dialogicity of Things.” Discourse and Communication 8 (1): 41–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Castor, Theresa R.
2016 “The materiality of discourse: relational positioning in a fresh water controversy.” Communication Research and Practice 2 (3): 334–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Metacommunication.” The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication: 1–9.Google Scholar
Castor, Theresa
2018 “Sustainability and Textual Extensions of Institutional Discourse: Testing the Great Lakes Compact.” Critical Sociology 44 (2): 341–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 47 ]
Cooren, François
2004 “Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings.” Organization 11 (3): 373–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “The Organizational World as a Plenum of Agencies.” In Communication as Organizing: Empirical and Theoretical Explorations in the Dynamic of Text and Conversation, ed. by François Cooren, James R. Taylor, and Elizabeth J. Van Every, 81–100. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2010Action and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation and Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 “In Medias Res: Communication, Existence, and Materiality.” Communication Research and Practice 1(4): 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François and Nicholas Bencherki
2010 “How things do things with words: Ventriloquism, passion and technology.” Encyclopaideia 15: 35–61.Google Scholar
Cooren, François, Frédérik Matte, Chantal Benoit-Barné, and Boris Brummans
2013 “Communication as Ventriloquism: A Grounded-in-Action Approach to the Study of Organizational Tensions.” Communication Monographs 80: 255–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François and Sergeiy Sandler
2014 “Polyphony, Ventriloquism, and Constitution: In Dialogue with Bakhtin.” Communication Theory 24: 225–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François, Fiona Thompson, Donna Canestraro, and Tamas Bodor
2006 “From Agency to Structure: Analysis of an Episode in a Facilitation Process.” Human Relations 59: 533–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Robert
2005How we talk about how we talk: Communication theory in the public interest. Journal of Communication 55: 659–667. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Robert T. and Karen Tracy
2014 “Building Grounded Practical Theory in Applied Communication Research: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 42 (3): 229–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Rodney H.
2012Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2008What Is the Style of Matters of Concern. Two Lectures in Empirical Philosophy. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A.
(ed.) 1993Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas
1990 “Technology, Environment and Social Risk: A Systems Perspective.” Industrial Crisis Quarterly 4(3): 223–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martine, Thomas, François Cooren, Aurélien Bénel, and Manuel Zacklad
2016 “What Does Really Matter in Technology Adoption and Use? A CCO Approach.” Management Communication Quarterly 30(2): 164–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall
1994Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond
2004 “Disaster or Sustainability: The Dance of Human Agents with Nature’s Actants.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 41(3): 249–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robles, Jessica S. and Elizabeth S. Parks
2019 “Complaints about technology as a resource for identity-work.” Language in Society 48(2): 209–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 48 ]
Rogers, Everett M.
1986Communication Technology. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Strifling, David
2018, March 20. Will the Foxconn project “transform” Wisconsin’s water resources? [Blog post]. Retrieved from law​.marquette​.edu​/facultyblog​/2018​/03​/20​/will​-the​-Foxconn​-project​-transform​-wisconsins​-water​-resources/
Tatge-Rozell, Jill
Taylor, James R. and Elizabeth J. Van Every
2014When organization fails: Why authority matters. Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, Alena, Jessica Robles, Jean Saludadez, Christian Schwägerl, and Theresa Castor
2019 “The varieties of (more or less) formal authority.” In Authority and Power in Social Interaction Methods and Analysis, ed. by Nicolas Bencherki, Frederic Matte, and François Cooren, 37–55. New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999Understanding Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Beavin Bavelas, and Don D. Jackson
1967Pragmatics of Human Ccommunication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred
1920The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar