Article published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp. 149–170

Straight to the people

Donald Trump’s rhetorical style on Twitter in the 2016 U.S. presidential election

| The Academic College at Wingate (Israel)
Research has shown that Donald Trump’s rhetorical style on Twitter differs significantly during the time he was a citizen, a presidential candidate and a president (Ott and Dickinson 2019). The aim of the current study is to characterize his rhetorical style on Twitter during the 2016 presidential race, in light of its potential to influence future campaigns in the U.S. and outside, and its implications on political and public discourse. The study presents a comprehensive analysis of Trump’s Twitter habits, using statistical analyses and a content analysis of all tweets posted on Trump’s Twitter account from the date he announced his presidential candidacy until he won the election. Analysing the results using framing theory reveals Trump’s main campaigning strategies on Twitter:(a) negative campaigning against his rivals and the establishment; (b) bypassing the traditional media; and (c) self-promotion. Trump used his Twitter far less frequently to express his vision or future plans.
Keywords: Donald Trump, Twitter, political campaign, content analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Research method
    • 2.1Statistical analysis
    • 2.2Content analysis
  • 3.Theoretical background
    • 3.1Political campaigns on Twitter
    • 3.2Twitter and “dialogism”
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Statistical analysis
    • 4.2Content analysis
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Selection
      • 5.1.1Negativity
      • 5.1.2Self-promotion
      • 5.1.3Direct communication
    • 5.2Emphasis
      • 5.2.1“One man show”
      • 5.2.2Slogans
    • 5.3Exclusion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 04 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00064.kay
References
Aharony, Noa
2012 “Twitter use by three political leaders: An exploratory analysis.” Online Information Review 36(4): 587–603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alang, Navneet
2016, November 15. “Trump is America’s first Twitter president. Be afraid.” New Republic. Retrieved from https://​newrepublic​.com​/article​/138753​/trump​-americas​-first​-twitter​-president​-afraid
Bakhtin, Mikhail
1986 “The problem of speech genres.” In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, Vern W. McGee (trans.) Austin: Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baragona, Justin
2017, January 20. “Should I keep the Twitter going or not?: Trump asks crowd at Inaugural Ball.” Retrieved from: http://​www​.mediaite​.com​/election​-2016​/should​-i​-keep​-the​-twitter​-going​-or​-not​-trump​-asks​-crowd​-at​-inaugural​-ball/
Bennett, Lance W.
2012 “The personalization of politics.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644(1): 20–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonaccini, Nicola
2016 “What Aristotle would say to Donald Trump.” Retrieved from: http://​www​.academia​.edu​/18954715​/Rethoric​_What​_Aristotle​_would​_say​_to​_Donald​_Trump
Brookey, Robert Alan and Brian L. Ott
2019 “Trump and Twitter 2.0.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 36(1): 92–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, Derrick L. and Fatima K. Espinoza-Vasquez
2011 “From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign.” Journal of Political Marketing 10(1–2): 189–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Bethany Anne, Kate Kenski, and Di Wang
2013 “Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign.” American Behavioral Scientist 57(11): 1596–1610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cowell, Philip
2017, March 2. “Culture – What overusing exclamation marks says about you.” Retrieved from: http://​www​.bbc​.co​.uk​/culture​/story​/20170301​-what​-overusing​-exclamation​-marks​-says​-about​-you​?ocid​=fbcul
Davis, Michael L. and Michael Ferrantino
1996 “Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie?” Public Choice 88 (1–2): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Entman, Robert M.
1993 “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.” Journal of Communication 431: 51–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Heather K., Kayla J. Brown, and Tiffany Wimberly
2017 “Delete your account: The 2016 presidential race in Twitter.” Social Science Computer Review 36(4): 500–508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Heather K., Victoria Cordova, and Savannah Sipole
2014 “Twitter style: An analysis of how House candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47(02): 454–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Francia, Peter L.
2017 “Free media and Twitter in the 2016 presidential election: The unconventional campaign of Donald Trump.” Social Science Computer Review, 36(4): 440–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gainor, Dan
2016, December 7. “Trump the Twitter president: Social media gives him tweet revenge.” Fox News. Retrieved from: http://​www​.foxnews​.com​/opinion​/2016​/12​/07​/trump​-twitter​-president​-social​-media​-gives​-him​-tweet​-revenge​.html
Gainous, Jason and Kevin M. Wagner
2014 Tweeting to power: The social media revolution in American politics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervine
1974 Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golbeck, Jennifer, Justin M. Grimes, and Anthony Rogers
2010 “Twitter use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(8): 1612–1621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Todd, Marcel Broersma, Karin Hazelhoff, and Guido Van’t Haar
2013 Between broadcasting political messages and interacting with voters.” Information, Communication and Society 16(5): 692–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Todd, Dan Jackson, and Marcel Broersma
2014 “New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns.” New Media and Society 18(5): 765–783. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gueorguieva, Vassia
2007 “Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond.” Social Science Computer Review 26(3): 288–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Nigel and Darren Lilleker
2011 “Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 17(1): 86–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jungherr, Andreas
2015 “Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review.” Journal of Information Technology and Politics 13(1): 72–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Khan, Laeeq
2016, November 15. “Trump Won Thanks to Social Media.” The Hill. Retrieved from: http://​thehill​.com​/blogs​/pundits​-blog​/technology​/306175​-trump​-won​-thanks​-to​-social​-media
Kreiss, Daniel
2014 “Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle.” New Media and Society 18(8): 1473–1490. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lilleker, Darren G. and Nigel Jackson
2014, March 19. “Brand management and relationship marketing in online environments.” Retrieved January 02, 2018, from: http://​eprints​.bournemouth​.ac​.uk​/21097/
Livnat, Zohar
2012 Dialogue, Science and Academic Writing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macnamara, Jim and Gail Kenning
2011 “E-Electioneering 2010: Trends in social media use in Australian political communication.” Media International Australia 139(1): 7–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Brian L.
2016 “The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(1): 59–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ott, Brian L. and Greg Dickinson
2019 The Twitter presidency: Donald J. Trump and the politics of white rage. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Zhongdang and Gerald M. Kosicki
1993 “Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse.” Political communication 10(1): 55–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin
2008 “Analyzing Political Rhetoric.” In Qualitative Discourse in the Social Sciences, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michal Kryzanowski: 96–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, Friederike, Sonja Utz, and Anja Göritz
2011 “Is the medium the message? Perceptions of and reactions to crisis communication via twitter, blogs and traditional media.” Public Relations Review 37(1): 20–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Small, Tamara A.
2011 “What the hashtag?”. Information, Communication and Society 14(6): 872–895. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Craig R.
2016 “Ronald Reagan’s rhetorical re-invention of conservatism.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 103(1–2): 33–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steudeman, Michael J. and Trevor Parry-Giles
2016 “Redeeming the maverick McCain: Game change as hyperreal campaign history.” Communication Quarterly 64(5): 553–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Kathleen
2004 Brainwashing: The science of thought control. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Maureen, Michael L. Kent, and William J. White
2001 “How activist organizations are using the Internet to build relationships.” Public Relations Review 271: 263–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tewksbury, David and Dietram A. Scheufele
2007 Special issue on framing, agenda setting, and priming: Agendas for theory and research.” Journal of Communication 57(1): 8–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trump, Donald and Tony Schwartz
2017 Trump the art of the deal. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Vergeer, Maurice, Hermans Liesbeth, and Steven Sams
2011 “Online social networks and microblogging in political campaigning.” Party Politics 19(3): 477–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Roger
2016, November 9. “How do you use the media to win? Just ask Donald Trump.” USA Today. Retrieved from: http://​www​.usatoday​.com​/story​/money​/2016​/11​/09​/trump​-presidential​-victory​-lesson​-how​-use​-media​-win​/93552638
Weigand, Edda
2009 Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2021. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.