Article published in:
Language and Dialogue
Vol. 10:2 (2020) ► pp. 241270
References

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail
(1924) 1990 “Author and Hero in Aesthetic Activity.” In Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, ed. by Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov, translated by Vadim Liapunov, 4–256. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
(1976) 1979 “Проблема текста в лингвистике, философии и других гуманитарных науках [The problem of Text in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Other Humanities].” In Эстетика словесного творчества [Aesthetics of Verbal Art], 281–307. Moscow: Iskusstvo.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland
(1968) 1977 “The Death of the Author.” In Image. Music. Text, translated by Stephen Heath, 142–148. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
(1973) 1981 “Theory of the Text.” In Untying the Text. A Poststructuralist Reader, edited by Robert Young, translated by Ian McLeod, 31–47. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
(1971) 1977 “From Work to Text.” In Image. Music. Text, translated by Stephen Heath, 155–164. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
[ p. 268 ]
Brodsky, Joseph
(1991) 1992 “О Сереже Довлатове [About Sergei Dovlatov].” Zvezda 2:4–6.Google Scholar
Cohen, Hermann
1912Ästhetik des reinen Gefühls [Esthetics of Pure Feeling], 2 vols. Berlin: Cassirer.Google Scholar
Dovlatov, Sergei
(1976) 2014Невидимая книга [The Invisible Book]. In Собрание сочинений Сергея Довлатова [The Collected Works of Sergei Dovlatov], compiled by Andrei Aryev, 6–112, vol. 3. St. Petersburg: Azbuka.Google Scholar
(1980) 2004Соло на ундервуде [Solo on an Underwood]. Соло на IBM [Solo on an IBM]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika.Google Scholar
(1982) 2011The Zone: A Prison Camp Guard’s Story. Translated by Anne Frydman. Richmond: Oneworld Classics.Google Scholar
(1987) 2003Филиал [Affiliate]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika.Google Scholar
1998 “Армейские письма к отцу [Army Letters to the Father].” Zvezda 5: 108–41.Google Scholar
2003Жизнь коротка [Life Is Short]. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-klassika.Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard
(1982) 1992Palimpsestes: La littérature au second degré. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Genis, Alexander
2004Довлатов и окрестности [Dovlatov and his Environs]. Moscow: Vagrius.Google Scholar
Guyau, Jean-Marie
1889L’Art au point de vue sociologique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Hemingway, Ernest
(1929) 1976A Farewell to Arms. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Herman, Judith L.
1992Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence. From Domestic Violence to Political Terror. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
von Humboldt, Wilhelm
1836Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues und ihren Einfluss auf die geistige Entiwickelung des Menschengeschlechts. Berlin: F. Dünmbr.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang
1979Der implizite Leser: Kommunikationsformen des Romans von Bunyan bis Beckett. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans R.
1979 “Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft.” In Rezeptionsästhetik, ed. by Rainer Warning, 126–162. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
1982a “Zum Problem des dialogischen Verstehens.” In Dialogizität, ed. by Renate Lachmann, 11–24. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
1982bToward an Aesthetic of Reception. Translated by Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Juvan, Marko
2008 “Towards a History of Intertextuality in Literary and Culture Studies.” CLC Web: Comparative Literature and Culture, Vol.10, Issue 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Kolk, Bessel
2014The Body Keeps the Score: Mind, Brain and Body in the Transformation of Trauma. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia
1967 “Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman.” Critique (239):438–465.Google Scholar
Kuritsin, Vyacheslav
2001Русский литературный постмодернизм [Russian Literary Postmodernism]. Moscow: OGI.Google Scholar
Levin, Harry
1951 “Observations on the Style of Ernest Hemingway.” Kenyon Review 13: 581–606.Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl
1940Man and Society in an Age of Reconstruction: Studies in Modern Social Structure. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
[ p. 269 ]
Marková, Ivana
2003Dialogicality and Social Representations. The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mika, Bogumiła
2013 “ ‘Looking out for the Horizon.’ The Music of Gustav Mahler in the Light of the Theory of the Aesthetic of Reception by Hans Robert Jauss.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Musicology 13, 189–202. Poznan: PTTPT and Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Müller-Wood, Anja
2014 “The Role of Emotions in Literary Communication: Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man .” In Literature as Dialogue: Invitations Offered and Negotiated, ed. by Roger D. Sell, 137–160. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Piegay-Gros, Nathalie
(2002) 2008Введение в теорию интертекстуальности [An Introduction to Intertextuality]. Translated and edited by Georgiy K. Kosikov. Moscow: LKI.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl R.
1964 “Naturgesetze und theoretische Systeme.” In Theorie und Realität, ed. by Hans Albert, 87–102. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Riffaterre, Michael
1980 “La trace de l’intertexte.” La Pensée: Revue du rationalisme moderne 215: 4–18.Google Scholar
Seliverstova, Olga
2002 “Когнитивная семантика на фоне общего развития лингвистической науки [Cognitive Semantics in the Framework of the Overall Development of Linguistics].” Voprosy Jazykoznanija 6: 12–26.Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D.
2014 “Introduction.” In Literature as Dialogue: Invitations Offered and Negotiated, ed. by Roger D. Sell, 1–20. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tyutchev, Fyodor
(1833) 1957 “Silentium!” In Полное собрание стихотворений [The Complete Collection of Poems], 321. Leningrad: Sovetskiy Pisatel.Google Scholar
Villard, Henry S. and James Nagel
1989Hemingway in Love and War: The Lost Diary of Agnes von Kurowsky. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Vysevkov, Pavel
2008 “Функции писем в структуре повести С. Довлатова «Зона» [Functions of the Letters in the structure of Dovlatov’s The Zone ].” Kritika i semiotika 9: 112–125.Google Scholar
[ p. 270 ]